patch: break into debugger on death in sanitizers

Reid Kleckner rnk at google.com
Tue Oct 29 13:26:10 PDT 2013


Based on in person discussion, this is not an option, because there are
users of ptrace that aren't debuggers.  See lsan and heapchecker for
example.


On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com>wrote:

> It should be easy to detect whether we're running under gdb (e.g. if we're
> being ptraced; perhaps something needs to be done in the presence of
> seccomp-bpf)
> On Oct 25, 2013 10:55 PM, "Kostya Serebryany" <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
> I am not opposed to this change, but I'd like to test it a bit more
> carefully to make sure none of our users get angry on us for behavior
> change.
> I'd suggest to put this sigtrap under a flag (off by default) and then
> flip the default to true after a bit of testing.
> We already have abort_on_error, may add sigtrap_on_error or some such.
>
> (may not reply until Mon next time)
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
>
>> Sigtrap, which seems less likely to cause deep surprise in the presence
>> of signal handlers.
>>  On Oct 25, 2013 3:56 AM, "Kostya Serebryany" <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So this will change the default behavior from doing exit(1) to doing
>>> abort(), right?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Running sanitized code under gdb can be annoying because the program
>>>> will print out its error then exit, instead of the usual behaviour when we
>>>> get an abort() of stopping the program there and allowing the user to
>>>> inspect its stack trace.
>>>>
>>>> Add a trap to the exit path in sanitizer_common. Please review!
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131029/b1045088/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list