[PATCH] Prefer breaking in places other than '(' for default style

[Daniel Jasper]

Submitted a configurable and slightly more conservative version as r193410.
Let me know if it needs further tweaking, ideally with examples.


On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Jasper <djasper at google.com> wrote:

> Yes, I imagin an integer-value. But finding the "right" value is hard. In
> the patch's current form, it uses the same as for function definitions. And
> in function definitions, it is definitely worse, as they more often look
> like a "wall of text" then. I would start with half the penalty and see how
> it goes.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Daniel Jasper <djasper at google.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, his change does that. All that I am asking is to not hard-code this
>>> but instead introduce a style-dependent value. I can pick this up
>>> tomorrow.. Should be a very straight-forward patch.
>>>
>>
>> I'm also wondering whether we really want to be able to tune this more
>> precisely. IE, it may have overcompensated in its current form....
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131025/23406f56/attachment.html>