[patch] [libcxx] deque the intended version!

[Marshall Clow]

On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:56 PM, G M <gmisocpp at gmail.com> wrote:

> patch intended (ironically) to fix a possible versioning mistake.
> <deque.diff>

It would be easier for me (in the future) if you'ld add a bit more context here.
[ Note: You are not alone in this; I have failed to explain what I'm trying to achieve with a patch, too ]

But, looking at your patch, it appears that you want to wrap the following routine 

template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
template <class _InputIter>
void
deque<_Tp, _Allocator>::assign(_InputIter __f, _InputIter __l,
                               typename enable_if<__is_input_iterator<_InputIter>::value &&
                                                 !__is_random_access_iterator<_InputIter>::value>::type*)
{
…
}

in an 
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 11
#endif

block. Is this correct?

If so, I think you are mistaken, since my copy of the C++11 standard (N3290) shows the following routine for deque:
         template <class InputIterator>
           void assign(InputIterator first, InputIterator last);


What makes you think that this routine did not exist in C++11?

-- Marshall

Marshall Clow     Idio Software   <mailto:mclow.lists at gmail.com>

A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
        -- Yu Suzuki