r191523 - Abstract out the emission of vtables, add basic support for vtable emission when using -cxx-abi microsoft

jahanian fjahanian at apple.com
Fri Sep 27 09:34:25 PDT 2013


This is the command line option being used (I trimmed out project name from it).

C:/.../clang-build/209891/bin/Release/clang.EXE -cc1 -internal-isystem C:\public\zorg\buildbot\smooshlab\slave-0.8\...\clang-build\209891\bin\Release\..\lib\clang\3.4\include -fno-rtti -emit-llvm C:\public\zorg\buildbot\smooshlab\slave-0.8\...\src\tools\clang\test\CodeGenCXX\microsoft-abi-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp -o - -cxx-abi microsoft -triple=i386-pc-win32 | FileCheck C:\public\zorg\buildbot\smooshlab\slave-0.8\...\src\tools\clang\test\CodeGenCXX\microsoft-abi-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp

C:\public\win64\src\tools\clang\test\CodeGenCXX\microsoft-abi-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp:165:12: error: expected string not found in input
   // CHECK: %[[VFPTR:.*]] = bitcast %struct.ChildOverride* %this1 to [1 x i8*]**
             ^
  <stdin>:168:36: note: scanning from here
   %2 = load %struct.ChildOverride** %1
                                     ^
  <stdin>:175:2: note: possible intended match here
   %9 = bitcast %struct.ChildOverride* %2 to [1 x i8*]**
   ^


- Fariborz

On Sep 27, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote:

> I just did a build with a Win64 toolchain locally and it passes the
> test. Any hints?
> 
> 2013/9/27 Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>:
>> Interesting. How do I diagnose?
>> Is it using a 64-bit Win toolchain?
>> 
>> 2013/9/27 jahanian <fjahanian at apple.com>:
>>> This patch causes a test failure in a win64 buildbot.
>>> 
>>> C:\public\win64\src\tools\clang\test\CodeGenCXX\microsoft-abi-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp:165:12:
>>> error: expected string not found in input
>>>   // CHECK: %[[VFPTR:.*]] = bitcast %struct.ChildOverride* %this1 to [1 x
>>> i8*]**
>>>             ^
>>>  <stdin>:168:36: note: scanning from here
>>>   %2 = load %struct.ChildOverride** %1
>>>                                     ^
>>>  <stdin>:175:2: note: possible intended match here
>>>   %9 = bitcast %struct.ChildOverride* %2 to [1 x i8*]**
>>>   ^
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - Fariborz
>>> 
>>> On Sep 27, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Author: timurrrr
>>> Date: Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> New Revision: 191523
>>> 
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=191523&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Abstract out the emission of vtables, add basic support for vtable emission
>>> when using -cxx-abi microsoft
>>> 
>>> Reviewed at http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1532
>>> 
>>> Added:
>>>   cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-constexpr-vs-inheritance.cpp
>>> Modified:
>>>   cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h
>>>   cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/VTableBuilder.h
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ItaniumMangle.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXX.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTT.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.h
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.h
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp
>>> 
>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-virtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> 
>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-single-inheritance.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance.cpp
>>>   cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/virtual-base-destructor-call.cpp
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -106,8 +106,16 @@ public:
>>>                                  raw_ostream &) = 0;
>>>  virtual void mangleReferenceTemporary(const VarDecl *D,
>>>                                        raw_ostream &) = 0;
>>> +  // FIXME: Some of these objects only exist in select ABIs. We should
>>> probably
>>> +  // only declare them in ABI-specific manglers?
>>>  virtual void mangleCXXVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>>                               raw_ostream &) = 0;
>>> +  /// \brief Mangle vftable symbols.  Only a subset of the bases along the
>>> path
>>> +  /// to the vftable are included in the name.  It's up to the caller to
>>> pick
>>> +  /// them correctly.
>>> +  virtual void mangleCXXVFTable(const CXXRecordDecl *Derived,
>>> +                                ArrayRef<const CXXRecordDecl *> BasePath,
>>> +                                raw_ostream &Out) = 0;
>>>  virtual void mangleCXXVTT(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>>                            raw_ostream &) = 0;
>>>  /// \brief Mangle vbtable symbols.  Only a subset of the bases along the
>>> path
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/VTableBuilder.h
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/VTableBuilder.h?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/VTableBuilder.h (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/AST/VTableBuilder.h Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -329,13 +329,6 @@ public:
>>>  VTableContext(ASTContext &Context);
>>>  ~VTableContext();
>>> 
>>> -  bool isMicrosoftABI() const {
>>> -    // FIXME: Currently, this method is only used in the VTableContext and
>>> -    // VTableBuilder code which is ABI-specific. Probably we can remove it
>>> -    // when we add a layer of abstraction for vtable generation.
>>> -    return IsMicrosoftABI;
>>> -  }
>>> -
>>>  const VTableLayout &getVTableLayout(const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
>>>    computeVTableRelatedInformation(RD);
>>>    assert(VTableLayouts.count(RD) && "No layout for this record decl!");
>>> @@ -377,11 +370,13 @@ unsigned GetVBTableIndex(const CXXRecord
>>> struct VFPtrInfo {
>>>  typedef SmallVector<const CXXRecordDecl *, 1> BasePath;
>>> 
>>> +  // Don't pass the PathToMangle as it should be calculated later.
>>>  VFPtrInfo(CharUnits VFPtrOffset, const BasePath &PathToBaseWithVFPtr)
>>>      : VBTableIndex(0), LastVBase(0), VFPtrOffset(VFPtrOffset),
>>>        PathToBaseWithVFPtr(PathToBaseWithVFPtr),
>>> VFPtrFullOffset(VFPtrOffset) {
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> +  // Don't pass the PathToMangle as it should be calculated later.
>>>  VFPtrInfo(uint64_t VBTableIndex, const CXXRecordDecl *LastVBase,
>>>            CharUnits VFPtrOffset, const BasePath &PathToBaseWithVFPtr,
>>>            CharUnits VFPtrFullOffset)
>>> @@ -404,9 +399,13 @@ struct VFPtrInfo {
>>>  CharUnits VFPtrOffset;
>>> 
>>>  /// This holds the base classes path from the complete type to the first
>>> base
>>> -  /// with the given vfptr offset.
>>> +  /// with the given vfptr offset, in the base-to-derived order.
>>>  BasePath PathToBaseWithVFPtr;
>>> 
>>> +  /// This holds the subset of records that need to be mangled into the
>>> vftable
>>> +  /// symbol name in order to get a unique name, in the derived-to-base
>>> order.
>>> +  BasePath PathToMangle;
>>> +
>>>  /// This is the full offset of the vfptr from the start of the complete
>>> type.
>>>  CharUnits VFPtrFullOffset;
>>> };
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ItaniumMangle.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ItaniumMangle.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ItaniumMangle.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ItaniumMangle.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -137,6 +137,9 @@ public:
>>>                                raw_ostream &);
>>>  void mangleCXXVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>>                       raw_ostream &);
>>> +  void mangleCXXVFTable(const CXXRecordDecl *Derived,
>>> +                        ArrayRef<const CXXRecordDecl *> BasePath,
>>> +                        raw_ostream &Out);
>>>  void mangleCXXVTT(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>>                    raw_ostream &);
>>>  void mangleCXXVBTable(const CXXRecordDecl *Derived,
>>> @@ -3772,6 +3775,14 @@ void ItaniumMangleContext::mangleCXXVTab
>>>  Mangler.mangleNameOrStandardSubstitution(RD);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> +void
>>> +ItaniumMangleContext::mangleCXXVFTable(const CXXRecordDecl *Derived,
>>> +                                       ArrayRef<const CXXRecordDecl *>
>>> BasePath,
>>> +                                       raw_ostream &Out) {
>>> +  llvm_unreachable(
>>> +      "The Itanium C++ ABI does not have vftables (use vtables instead)!");
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void ItaniumMangleContext::mangleCXXVTT(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>>                                        raw_ostream &Out) {
>>>  // <special-name> ::= TT <type>  # VTT structure
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ public:
>>>                                  raw_ostream &);
>>>  virtual void mangleCXXVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>>                               raw_ostream &);
>>> +  virtual void mangleCXXVFTable(const CXXRecordDecl *Derived,
>>> +                                ArrayRef<const CXXRecordDecl *> BasePath,
>>> +                                raw_ostream &Out);
>>>  virtual void mangleCXXVTT(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>>                            raw_ostream &);
>>>  virtual void mangleCXXVBTable(const CXXRecordDecl *Derived,
>>> @@ -1900,16 +1903,26 @@ void MicrosoftMangleContext::mangleCXXDt
>>> 
>>> void MicrosoftMangleContext::mangleCXXVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>>                                             raw_ostream &Out) {
>>> +  llvm_unreachable(
>>> +      "The Microsoft C++ ABI does not have vtables (use vftables
>>> instead)!");
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void MicrosoftMangleContext::mangleCXXVFTable(
>>> +    const CXXRecordDecl *Derived, ArrayRef<const CXXRecordDecl *> BasePath,
>>> +    raw_ostream &Out) {
>>>  // <mangled-name> ::= ?_7 <class-name> <storage-class>
>>>  //                    <cvr-qualifiers> [<name>] @
>>>  // NOTE: <cvr-qualifiers> here is always 'B' (const). <storage-class>
>>>  // is always '6' for vftables.
>>>  MicrosoftCXXNameMangler Mangler(*this, Out);
>>>  Mangler.getStream() << "\01??_7";
>>> -  Mangler.mangleName(RD);
>>> -  Mangler.getStream() << "6B";  // '6' for vftable, 'B' for const.
>>> -  // TODO: If the class has more than one vtable, mangle in the class it
>>> came
>>> -  // from.
>>> +  Mangler.mangleName(Derived);
>>> +  Mangler.getStream() << "6B"; // '6' for vftable, 'B' for const.
>>> +  for (ArrayRef<const CXXRecordDecl *>::iterator I = BasePath.begin(),
>>> +                                                 E = BasePath.end();
>>> +       I != E; ++I) {
>>> +    Mangler.mangleName(*I);
>>> +  }
>>>  Mangler.getStream() << '@';
>>> }
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -999,10 +999,6 @@ public:
>>>      dumpLayout(llvm::errs());
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> -  bool isMicrosoftABI() const {
>>> -    return VTables.isMicrosoftABI();
>>> -  }
>>> -
>>>  uint64_t getNumThunks() const {
>>>    return Thunks.size();
>>>  }
>>> @@ -1157,7 +1153,7 @@ void VTableBuilder::ComputeThisAdjustmen
>>>    // Add it.
>>>    VTableThunks[VTableIndex].This = ThisAdjustment;
>>> 
>>> -    if (isa<CXXDestructorDecl>(MD) && !isMicrosoftABI()) {
>>> +    if (isa<CXXDestructorDecl>(MD)) {
>>>      // Add an adjustment for the deleting destructor as well.
>>>      VTableThunks[VTableIndex + 1].This = ThisAdjustment;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -1188,8 +1184,6 @@ void VTableBuilder::ComputeThisAdjustmen
>>>      break;
>>>    case VTableComponent::CK_DeletingDtorPointer:
>>>      // We've already added the thunk when we saw the complete dtor
>>> pointer.
>>> -      // FIXME: check how this works in the Microsoft ABI
>>> -      // while working on the multiple inheritance patch.
>>>      continue;
>>>    }
>>> 
>>> @@ -1326,15 +1320,9 @@ VTableBuilder::AddMethod(const CXXMethod
>>>    assert(ReturnAdjustment.isEmpty() &&
>>>           "Destructor can't have return adjustment!");
>>> 
>>> -    // FIXME: Should probably add a layer of abstraction for vtable
>>> generation.
>>> -    if (!isMicrosoftABI()) {
>>> -      // Add both the complete destructor and the deleting destructor.
>>> -      Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeCompleteDtor(DD));
>>> -      Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeDeletingDtor(DD));
>>> -    } else {
>>> -      // Add the scalar deleting destructor.
>>> -      Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeDeletingDtor(DD));
>>> -    }
>>> +    // Add both the complete destructor and the deleting destructor.
>>> +    Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeCompleteDtor(DD));
>>> +    Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeDeletingDtor(DD));
>>>  } else {
>>>    // Add the return adjustment if necessary.
>>>    if (!ReturnAdjustment.isEmpty())
>>> @@ -1693,18 +1681,12 @@ VTableBuilder::LayoutPrimaryAndSecondary
>>>  if (Base.getBase() == MostDerivedClass)
>>>    VBaseOffsetOffsets = Builder.getVBaseOffsetOffsets();
>>> 
>>> -  // FIXME: Should probably add a layer of abstraction for vtable
>>> generation.
>>> -  if (!isMicrosoftABI()) {
>>> -    // Add the offset to top.
>>> -    CharUnits OffsetToTop = MostDerivedClassOffset - OffsetInLayoutClass;
>>> -    Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeOffsetToTop(OffsetToTop));
>>> +  // Add the offset to top.
>>> +  CharUnits OffsetToTop = MostDerivedClassOffset - OffsetInLayoutClass;
>>> +  Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeOffsetToTop(OffsetToTop));
>>> 
>>> -    // Next, add the RTTI.
>>> -    Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeRTTI(MostDerivedClass));
>>> -  } else {
>>> -    // FIXME: unclear what to do with RTTI in MS ABI as emitting it
>>> anywhere
>>> -    // breaks the vftable layout. Just skip RTTI for now, can't mangle
>>> anyway.
>>> -  }
>>> +  // Next, add the RTTI.
>>> +  Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeRTTI(MostDerivedClass));
>>> 
>>>  uint64_t AddressPoint = Components.size();
>>> 
>>> @@ -1722,16 +1704,10 @@ VTableBuilder::LayoutPrimaryAndSecondary
>>>      const CXXMethodDecl *MD = I->first;
>>>      const MethodInfo &MI = I->second;
>>>      if (const CXXDestructorDecl *DD = dyn_cast<CXXDestructorDecl>(MD)) {
>>> -        // FIXME: Should probably add a layer of abstraction for vtable
>>> generation.
>>> -        if (!isMicrosoftABI()) {
>>> -          MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Complete)]
>>> -              = MI.VTableIndex - AddressPoint;
>>> -          MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Deleting)]
>>> -              = MI.VTableIndex + 1 - AddressPoint;
>>> -        } else {
>>> -          MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Deleting)]
>>> -              = MI.VTableIndex - AddressPoint;
>>> -        }
>>> +        MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Complete)]
>>> +            = MI.VTableIndex - AddressPoint;
>>> +        MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Deleting)]
>>> +            = MI.VTableIndex + 1 - AddressPoint;
>>>      } else {
>>>        MethodVTableIndices[MD] = MI.VTableIndex - AddressPoint;
>>>      }
>>> @@ -2044,8 +2020,6 @@ void VTableBuilder::dumpLayout(raw_ostre
>>>      Out << DD->getQualifiedNameAsString();
>>>      if (IsComplete)
>>>        Out << "() [complete]";
>>> -      else if (isMicrosoftABI())
>>> -        Out << "() [scalar deleting]";
>>>      else
>>>        Out << "() [deleting]";
>>> 
>>> @@ -2230,18 +2204,11 @@ void VTableBuilder::dumpLayout(raw_ostre
>>>                                  MD);
>>> 
>>>    if (const CXXDestructorDecl *DD = dyn_cast<CXXDestructorDecl>(MD)) {
>>> -      // FIXME: Should add a layer of abstraction for vtable generation.
>>> -      if (!isMicrosoftABI()) {
>>> -        GlobalDecl GD(DD, Dtor_Complete);
>>> -        assert(MethodVTableIndices.count(GD));
>>> -        uint64_t VTableIndex = MethodVTableIndices[GD];
>>> -        IndicesMap[VTableIndex] = MethodName + " [complete]";
>>> -        IndicesMap[VTableIndex + 1] = MethodName + " [deleting]";
>>> -      } else {
>>> -        GlobalDecl GD(DD, Dtor_Deleting);
>>> -        assert(MethodVTableIndices.count(GD));
>>> -        IndicesMap[MethodVTableIndices[GD]] = MethodName + " [scalar
>>> deleting]";
>>> -      }
>>> +      GlobalDecl GD(DD, Dtor_Complete);
>>> +      assert(MethodVTableIndices.count(GD));
>>> +      uint64_t VTableIndex = MethodVTableIndices[GD];
>>> +      IndicesMap[VTableIndex] = MethodName + " [complete]";
>>> +      IndicesMap[VTableIndex + 1] = MethodName + " [deleting]";
>>>    } else {
>>>      assert(MethodVTableIndices.count(MD));
>>>      IndicesMap[MethodVTableIndices[MD]] = MethodName;
>>> @@ -2352,10 +2319,12 @@ static VTableLayout *CreateVTableLayout(
>>>                          VTableThunks.size(),
>>>                          VTableThunks.data(),
>>>                          Builder.getAddressPoints(),
>>> -                          Builder.isMicrosoftABI());
>>> +                          /*IsMicrosoftABI=*/false);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> void VTableContext::computeVTableRelatedInformation(const CXXRecordDecl *RD)
>>> {
>>> +  assert(!IsMicrosoftABI && "Shouldn't be called in this ABI!");
>>> +
>>>  const VTableLayout *&Entry = VTableLayouts[RD];
>>> 
>>>  // Check if we've computed this information before.
>>> @@ -3132,6 +3101,55 @@ static void EnumerateVFPtrs(
>>>  }
>>> }
>>> 
>>> +/// CalculatePathToMangle - Calculate the subset of records that should be
>>> used
>>> +/// to mangle the vftable for the given vfptr.
>>> +/// Should only be called if a class has multiple vftables.
>>> +static void
>>> +CalculatePathToMangle(const CXXRecordDecl *RD, VFPtrInfo &VFPtr) {
>>> +  // FIXME: In some rare cases this code produces a slightly incorrect
>>> mangling.
>>> +  // It's very likely that the vbtable mangling code can be adjusted to
>>> mangle
>>> +  // both vftables and vbtables correctly.
>>> +
>>> +  VFPtrInfo::BasePath &FullPath = VFPtr.PathToBaseWithVFPtr;
>>> +  if (FullPath.empty()) {
>>> +    // Mangle the class's own vftable.
>>> +    assert(RD->getNumVBases() &&
>>> +           "Something's wrong: if the most derived "
>>> +           "class has more than one vftable, it can only have its own "
>>> +           "vftable if it has vbases");
>>> +    VFPtr.PathToMangle.push_back(RD);
>>> +    return;
>>> +  }
>>> +
>>> +  unsigned Begin = 0;
>>> +
>>> +  // First, skip all the bases before the vbase.
>>> +  if (VFPtr.LastVBase) {
>>> +    while (FullPath[Begin] != VFPtr.LastVBase) {
>>> +      Begin++;
>>> +      assert(Begin < FullPath.size());
>>> +    }
>>> +  }
>>> +
>>> +  // Then, put the rest of the base path in the reverse order.
>>> +  for (unsigned I = FullPath.size(); I != Begin; --I) {
>>> +    const CXXRecordDecl *CurBase = FullPath[I - 1],
>>> +                        *ItsBase = (I == 1) ? RD : FullPath[I - 2];
>>> +    bool BaseIsVirtual = false;
>>> +    for (CXXRecordDecl::base_class_const_iterator J =
>>> ItsBase->bases_begin(),
>>> +         F = ItsBase->bases_end(); J != F; ++J) {
>>> +      if (J->getType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl() == CurBase) {
>>> +        BaseIsVirtual = J->isVirtual();
>>> +        break;
>>> +      }
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    // Should skip the current base if it is a non-virtual base with no
>>> siblings.
>>> +    if (BaseIsVirtual || ItsBase->getNumBases() != 1)
>>> +      VFPtr.PathToMangle.push_back(CurBase);
>>> +  }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void EnumerateVFPtrs(ASTContext &Context, const CXXRecordDecl
>>> *ForClass,
>>>                            MicrosoftVFTableContext::VFPtrListTy &Result) {
>>>  Result.clear();
>>> @@ -3140,6 +3158,10 @@ static void EnumerateVFPtrs(ASTContext &
>>>  EnumerateVFPtrs(Context, ForClass, ClassLayout,
>>>                  BaseSubobject(ForClass, CharUnits::Zero()), 0,
>>>                  VFPtrInfo::BasePath(), VisitedVBases, Result);
>>> +  if (Result.size() > 1) {
>>> +    for (unsigned I = 0, E = Result.size(); I != E; ++I)
>>> +      CalculatePathToMangle(ForClass, Result[I]);
>>> +  }
>>> }
>>> 
>>> void MicrosoftVFTableContext::computeVTableRelatedInformation(
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXX.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXX.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXX.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXX.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static llvm::Value *BuildAppleKextVirtua
>>>         "No kext in Microsoft ABI");
>>>  GD = GD.getCanonicalDecl();
>>>  CodeGenModule &CGM = CGF.CGM;
>>> -  llvm::Value *VTable = CGM.getVTables().GetAddrOfVTable(RD);
>>> +  llvm::Value *VTable = CGM.getCXXABI().getAddrOfVTable(RD, CharUnits());
>>>  Ty = Ty->getPointerTo()->getPointerTo();
>>>  VTable = CGF.Builder.CreateBitCast(VTable, Ty);
>>>  assert(VTable && "BuildVirtualCall = kext vtbl pointer is null");
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -303,6 +303,29 @@ public:
>>>                                   CallExpr::const_arg_iterator ArgBeg,
>>>                                   CallExpr::const_arg_iterator ArgEnd) = 0;
>>> 
>>> +  /// Emits the VTable definitions required for the given record type.
>>> +  virtual void emitVTableDefinitions(CodeGenVTables &CGVT,
>>> +                                     const CXXRecordDecl *RD) = 0;
>>> +
>>> +  /// Get the address point of the vtable for the given base subobject
>>> while
>>> +  /// building a constructor or a destructor. On return, NeedsVirtualOffset
>>> +  /// tells if a virtual base adjustment is needed in order to get the
>>> offset
>>> +  /// of the base subobject.
>>> +  virtual llvm::Value *getVTableAddressPointInStructor(
>>> +      CodeGenFunction &CGF, const CXXRecordDecl *RD, BaseSubobject Base,
>>> +      const CXXRecordDecl *NearestVBase, bool &NeedsVirtualOffset) = 0;
>>> +
>>> +  /// Get the address point of the vtable for the given base subobject
>>> while
>>> +  /// building a constexpr.
>>> +  virtual llvm::Constant *
>>> +  getVTableAddressPointForConstExpr(BaseSubobject Base,
>>> +                                    const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass) = 0;
>>> +
>>> +  /// Get the address of the vtable for the given record decl which should
>>> be
>>> +  /// used for the vptr at the given offset in RD.
>>> +  virtual llvm::GlobalVariable *getAddrOfVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>> +                                                CharUnits VPtrOffset) = 0;
>>> +
>>>  /// Build a virtual function pointer in the ABI-specific way.
>>>  virtual llvm::Value *getVirtualFunctionPointer(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
>>>                                                 GlobalDecl GD,
>>> @@ -319,9 +342,7 @@ public:
>>>  /// Emit any tables needed to implement virtual inheritance.  For Itanium,
>>>  /// this emits virtual table tables.  For the MSVC++ ABI, this emits
>>> virtual
>>>  /// base tables.
>>> -  virtual void
>>> -      EmitVirtualInheritanceTables(llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes
>>> Linkage,
>>> -                                   const CXXRecordDecl *RD) = 0;
>>> +  virtual void emitVirtualInheritanceTables(const CXXRecordDecl *RD) = 0;
>>> 
>>>  virtual void EmitReturnFromThunk(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
>>>                                   RValue RV, QualType ResultType);
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -1878,39 +1878,19 @@ CodeGenFunction::InitializeVTablePointer
>>>                                         const CXXRecordDecl *NearestVBase,
>>>                                         CharUnits OffsetFromNearestVBase,
>>>                                         const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass) {
>>> -  const CXXRecordDecl *RD = Base.getBase();
>>> -
>>>  // Compute the address point.
>>> -  llvm::Value *VTableAddressPoint;
>>> -
>>> -  bool NeedsVTTParam = CGM.getCXXABI().NeedsVTTParameter(CurGD);
>>> -
>>> -  // Check if we need to use a vtable from the VTT.
>>> -  if (NeedsVTTParam && (RD->getNumVBases() || NearestVBase)) {
>>> -    // Get the secondary vpointer index.
>>> -    uint64_t VirtualPointerIndex =
>>> -     CGM.getVTables().getSecondaryVirtualPointerIndex(VTableClass, Base);
>>> -
>>> -    /// Load the VTT.
>>> -    llvm::Value *VTT = LoadCXXVTT();
>>> -    if (VirtualPointerIndex)
>>> -      VTT = Builder.CreateConstInBoundsGEP1_64(VTT, VirtualPointerIndex);
>>> -
>>> -    // And load the address point from the VTT.
>>> -    VTableAddressPoint = Builder.CreateLoad(VTT);
>>> -  } else {
>>> -    llvm::Constant *VTable = CGM.getVTables().GetAddrOfVTable(VTableClass);
>>> -    uint64_t AddressPoint =
>>> -
>>> CGM.getVTableContext().getVTableLayout(VTableClass).getAddressPoint(Base);
>>> -    VTableAddressPoint =
>>> -      Builder.CreateConstInBoundsGEP2_64(VTable, 0, AddressPoint);
>>> -  }
>>> +  bool NeedsVirtualOffset;
>>> +  llvm::Value *VTableAddressPoint =
>>> +      CGM.getCXXABI().getVTableAddressPointInStructor(
>>> +          *this, VTableClass, Base, NearestVBase, NeedsVirtualOffset);
>>> +  if (!VTableAddressPoint)
>>> +    return;
>>> 
>>>  // Compute where to store the address point.
>>>  llvm::Value *VirtualOffset = 0;
>>>  CharUnits NonVirtualOffset = CharUnits::Zero();
>>> 
>>> -  if (NeedsVTTParam && NearestVBase) {
>>> +  if (NeedsVirtualOffset) {
>>>    // We need to use the virtual base offset offset because the virtual
>>> base
>>>    // might have a different offset in the most derived class.
>>>    VirtualOffset = CGM.getCXXABI().GetVirtualBaseClassOffset(*this,
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -1053,7 +1053,11 @@ CGDebugInfo::CreateCXXMemberFunction(con
>>> 
>>>    // It doesn't make sense to give a virtual destructor a vtable index,
>>>    // since a single destructor has two entries in the vtable.
>>> -    if (!isa<CXXDestructorDecl>(Method))
>>> +    // FIXME: Add proper support for debug info for virtual calls in
>>> +    // the Microsoft ABI, where we may use multiple vptrs to make a vftable
>>> +    // lookup if we have multiple or virtual inheritance.
>>> +    if (!isa<CXXDestructorDecl>(Method) &&
>>> +        !CGM.getTarget().getCXXABI().isMicrosoft())
>>>      VIndex = CGM.getVTableContext().getMethodVTableIndex(Method);
>>>    ContainingType = RecordTy;
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -53,9 +53,6 @@ private:
>>>    NextFieldOffsetInChars(CharUnits::Zero()),
>>>    LLVMStructAlignment(CharUnits::One()) { }
>>> 
>>> -  void AppendVTablePointer(BaseSubobject Base, llvm::Constant *VTable,
>>> -                           const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass);
>>> -
>>>  void AppendField(const FieldDecl *Field, uint64_t FieldOffset,
>>>                   llvm::Constant *InitExpr);
>>> 
>>> @@ -72,8 +69,7 @@ private:
>>> 
>>>  bool Build(InitListExpr *ILE);
>>>  void Build(const APValue &Val, const RecordDecl *RD, bool IsPrimaryBase,
>>> -             llvm::Constant *VTable, const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass,
>>> -             CharUnits BaseOffset);
>>> +             const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass, CharUnits BaseOffset);
>>>  llvm::Constant *Finalize(QualType Ty);
>>> 
>>>  CharUnits getAlignment(const llvm::Constant *C) const {
>>> @@ -88,23 +84,6 @@ private:
>>>  }
>>> };
>>> 
>>> -void ConstStructBuilder::AppendVTablePointer(BaseSubobject Base,
>>> -                                             llvm::Constant *VTable,
>>> -                                             const CXXRecordDecl
>>> *VTableClass) {
>>> -  // Find the appropriate vtable within the vtable group.
>>> -  uint64_t AddressPoint =
>>> -
>>> CGM.getVTableContext().getVTableLayout(VTableClass).getAddressPoint(Base);
>>> -  llvm::Value *Indices[] = {
>>> -    llvm::ConstantInt::get(CGM.Int64Ty, 0),
>>> -    llvm::ConstantInt::get(CGM.Int64Ty, AddressPoint)
>>> -  };
>>> -  llvm::Constant *VTableAddressPoint =
>>> -    llvm::ConstantExpr::getInBoundsGetElementPtr(VTable, Indices);
>>> -
>>> -  // Add the vtable at the start of the object.
>>> -  AppendBytes(Base.getBaseOffset(), VTableAddressPoint);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> void ConstStructBuilder::
>>> AppendField(const FieldDecl *Field, uint64_t FieldOffset,
>>>            llvm::Constant *InitCst) {
>>> @@ -424,15 +403,19 @@ struct BaseInfo {
>>> }
>>> 
>>> void ConstStructBuilder::Build(const APValue &Val, const RecordDecl *RD,
>>> -                               bool IsPrimaryBase, llvm::Constant *VTable,
>>> +                               bool IsPrimaryBase,
>>>                               const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass,
>>>                               CharUnits Offset) {
>>>  const ASTRecordLayout &Layout = CGM.getContext().getASTRecordLayout(RD);
>>> 
>>>  if (const CXXRecordDecl *CD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RD)) {
>>>    // Add a vtable pointer, if we need one and it hasn't already been
>>> added.
>>> -    if (CD->isDynamicClass() && !IsPrimaryBase)
>>> -      AppendVTablePointer(BaseSubobject(CD, Offset), VTable, VTableClass);
>>> +    if (CD->isDynamicClass() && !IsPrimaryBase) {
>>> +      llvm::Constant *VTableAddressPoint =
>>> +          CGM.getCXXABI().getVTableAddressPointForConstExpr(
>>> +              BaseSubobject(CD, Offset), VTableClass);
>>> +      AppendBytes(Offset, VTableAddressPoint);
>>> +    }
>>> 
>>>    // Accumulate and sort bases, in order to visit them in address order,
>>> which
>>>    // may not be the same as declaration order.
>>> @@ -453,7 +436,7 @@ void ConstStructBuilder::Build(const APV
>>> 
>>>      bool IsPrimaryBase = Layout.getPrimaryBase() == Base.Decl;
>>>      Build(Val.getStructBase(Base.Index), Base.Decl, IsPrimaryBase,
>>> -            VTable, VTableClass, Offset + Base.Offset);
>>> +            VTableClass, Offset + Base.Offset);
>>>    }
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> @@ -560,11 +543,7 @@ llvm::Constant *ConstStructBuilder::Buil
>>> 
>>>  const RecordDecl *RD = ValTy->castAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
>>>  const CXXRecordDecl *CD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RD);
>>> -  llvm::Constant *VTable = 0;
>>> -  if (CD && CD->isDynamicClass())
>>> -    VTable = CGM.getVTables().GetAddrOfVTable(CD);
>>> -
>>> -  Builder.Build(Val, RD, false, VTable, CD, CharUnits::Zero());
>>> +  Builder.Build(Val, RD, false, CD, CharUnits::Zero());
>>> 
>>>  return Builder.Finalize(ValTy);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTT.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTT.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTT.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTT.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ using namespace clang;
>>> using namespace CodeGen;
>>> 
>>> static llvm::Constant *
>>> -GetAddrOfVTTVTable(CodeGenVTables &CGVT, const CXXRecordDecl
>>> *MostDerivedClass,
>>> +GetAddrOfVTTVTable(CodeGenVTables &CGVT, CodeGenModule &CGM,
>>> +                   const CXXRecordDecl *MostDerivedClass,
>>>                   const VTTVTable &VTable,
>>>                   llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes Linkage,
>>>                   llvm::DenseMap<BaseSubobject, uint64_t> &AddressPoints) {
>>> @@ -27,7 +28,7 @@ GetAddrOfVTTVTable(CodeGenVTables &CGVT,
>>>    assert(VTable.getBaseOffset().isZero() &&
>>>           "Most derived class vtable must have a zero offset!");
>>>    // This is a regular vtable.
>>> -    return CGVT.GetAddrOfVTable(MostDerivedClass);
>>> +    return CGM.getCXXABI().getAddrOfVTable(MostDerivedClass, CharUnits());
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  return CGVT.GenerateConstructionVTable(MostDerivedClass,
>>> @@ -52,7 +53,7 @@ CodeGenVTables::EmitVTTDefinition(llvm::
>>>  for (const VTTVTable *i = Builder.getVTTVTables().begin(),
>>>                       *e = Builder.getVTTVTables().end(); i != e; ++i) {
>>>    VTableAddressPoints.push_back(VTableAddressPointsMapTy());
>>> -    VTables.push_back(GetAddrOfVTTVTable(*this, RD, *i, Linkage,
>>> +    VTables.push_back(GetAddrOfVTTVTable(*this, CGM, RD, *i, Linkage,
>>>                                         VTableAddressPoints.back()));
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ llvm::GlobalVariable *CodeGenVTables::Ge
>>>  StringRef Name = OutName.str();
>>> 
>>>  // This will also defer the definition of the VTT.
>>> -  (void) GetAddrOfVTable(RD);
>>> +  (void) CGM.getCXXABI().getAddrOfVTable(RD, CharUnits());
>>> 
>>>  VTTBuilder Builder(CGM.getContext(), RD, /*GenerateDefinition=*/false);
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@ void CodeGenVTables::EmitThunks(GlobalDe
>>>    // FIXME: This is a temporary solution to force generation of vftables
>>> in
>>>    // Microsoft ABI. Remove when we thread VFTableContext through CodeGen.
>>>    VFTContext->getVFPtrOffsets(MD->getParent());
>>> +    return;
>>>  }
>>> 
>>>  const VTableContext::ThunkInfoVectorTy *ThunkInfoVector =
>>> @@ -629,53 +630,6 @@ CodeGenVTables::CreateVTableInitializer(
>>>  return llvm::ConstantArray::get(ArrayType, Inits);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> -llvm::GlobalVariable *CodeGenVTables::GetAddrOfVTable(const CXXRecordDecl
>>> *RD) {
>>> -  llvm::GlobalVariable *&VTable = VTables[RD];
>>> -  if (VTable)
>>> -    return VTable;
>>> -
>>> -  // Queue up this v-table for possible deferred emission.
>>> -  CGM.addDeferredVTable(RD);
>>> -
>>> -  SmallString<256> OutName;
>>> -  llvm::raw_svector_ostream Out(OutName);
>>> -  CGM.getCXXABI().getMangleContext().mangleCXXVTable(RD, Out);
>>> -  Out.flush();
>>> -  StringRef Name = OutName.str();
>>> -
>>> -  llvm::ArrayType *ArrayType =
>>> -    llvm::ArrayType::get(CGM.Int8PtrTy,
>>> -
>>> VTContext.getVTableLayout(RD).getNumVTableComponents());
>>> -
>>> -  VTable =
>>> -    CGM.CreateOrReplaceCXXRuntimeVariable(Name, ArrayType,
>>> -
>>> llvm::GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage);
>>> -  VTable->setUnnamedAddr(true);
>>> -  return VTable;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -void
>>> -CodeGenVTables::EmitVTableDefinition(llvm::GlobalVariable *VTable,
>>> -                                     llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes
>>> Linkage,
>>> -                                     const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
>>> -  const VTableLayout &VTLayout = VTContext.getVTableLayout(RD);
>>> -
>>> -  // Create and set the initializer.
>>> -  llvm::Constant *Init =
>>> -    CreateVTableInitializer(RD,
>>> -                            VTLayout.vtable_component_begin(),
>>> -                            VTLayout.getNumVTableComponents(),
>>> -                            VTLayout.vtable_thunk_begin(),
>>> -                            VTLayout.getNumVTableThunks());
>>> -  VTable->setInitializer(Init);
>>> -
>>> -  // Set the correct linkage.
>>> -  VTable->setLinkage(Linkage);
>>> -
>>> -  // Set the right visibility.
>>> -  CGM.setTypeVisibility(VTable, RD, CodeGenModule::TVK_ForVTable);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> llvm::GlobalVariable *
>>> CodeGenVTables::GenerateConstructionVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>>                                      const BaseSubobject &Base,
>>> @@ -818,35 +772,10 @@ CodeGenVTables::GenerateClassData(const
>>>  if (CGDebugInfo *DI = CGM.getModuleDebugInfo())
>>>    DI->completeClassData(RD);
>>> 
>>> -  if (VFTContext.isValid()) {
>>> -    // FIXME: This is a temporary solution to force generation of vftables
>>> in
>>> -    // Microsoft ABI. Remove when we thread VFTableContext through CodeGen.
>>> -    VFTContext->getVFPtrOffsets(RD);
>>> -  }
>>> -
>>> -  // First off, check whether we've already emitted the v-table and
>>> -  // associated stuff.
>>> -  llvm::GlobalVariable *VTable = GetAddrOfVTable(RD);
>>> -  if (VTable->hasInitializer())
>>> -    return;
>>> -
>>> -  llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes Linkage = CGM.getVTableLinkage(RD);
>>> -  EmitVTableDefinition(VTable, Linkage, RD);
>>> -
>>>  if (RD->getNumVBases())
>>> -    CGM.getCXXABI().EmitVirtualInheritanceTables(Linkage, RD);
>>> +    CGM.getCXXABI().emitVirtualInheritanceTables(RD);
>>> 
>>> -  // If this is the magic class __cxxabiv1::__fundamental_type_info,
>>> -  // we will emit the typeinfo for the fundamental types. This is the
>>> -  // same behaviour as GCC.
>>> -  const DeclContext *DC = RD->getDeclContext();
>>> -  if (RD->getIdentifier() &&
>>> -      RD->getIdentifier()->isStr("__fundamental_type_info") &&
>>> -      isa<NamespaceDecl>(DC) &&
>>> -      cast<NamespaceDecl>(DC)->getIdentifier() &&
>>> -      cast<NamespaceDecl>(DC)->getIdentifier()->isStr("__cxxabiv1") &&
>>> -      DC->getParent()->isTranslationUnit())
>>> -    CGM.EmitFundamentalRTTIDescriptors();
>>> +  CGM.getCXXABI().emitVTableDefinitions(*this, RD);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> /// At this point in the translation unit, does it appear that can we
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.h
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.h?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.h (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.h Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ class CodeGenVTables {
>>>  // classes?
>>>  VTableContext VTContext;
>>>  OwningPtr<MicrosoftVFTableContext> VFTContext;
>>> -
>>> -  /// VTables - All the vtables which have been defined.
>>> -  llvm::DenseMap<const CXXRecordDecl *, llvm::GlobalVariable *> VTables;
>>> 
>>>  /// VTableAddressPointsMapTy - Address points for a single vtable.
>>>  typedef llvm::DenseMap<BaseSubobject, uint64_t> VTableAddressPointsMapTy;
>>> @@ -65,6 +62,7 @@ class CodeGenVTables {
>>>  /// doesn't contain any incomplete types.
>>>  void MaybeEmitThunkAvailableExternally(GlobalDecl GD, const ThunkInfo
>>> &Thunk);
>>> 
>>> +public:
>>>  /// CreateVTableInitializer - Create a vtable initializer for the given
>>> record
>>>  /// decl.
>>>  /// \param Components - The vtable components; this is really an array of
>>> @@ -75,7 +73,6 @@ class CodeGenVTables {
>>>                                const VTableLayout::VTableThunkTy
>>> *VTableThunks,
>>>                                          unsigned NumVTableThunks);
>>> 
>>> -public:
>>>  CodeGenVTables(CodeGenModule &CGM);
>>> 
>>>  VTableContext &getVTableContext() { return VTContext; }
>>> @@ -95,14 +92,6 @@ public:
>>>  /// class decl.
>>>  uint64_t getAddressPoint(BaseSubobject Base, const CXXRecordDecl *RD);
>>> 
>>> -  /// GetAddrOfVTable - Get the address of the vtable for the given record
>>> decl.
>>> -  llvm::GlobalVariable *GetAddrOfVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD);
>>> -
>>> -  /// EmitVTableDefinition - Emit the definition of the given vtable.
>>> -  void EmitVTableDefinition(llvm::GlobalVariable *VTable,
>>> -                            llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes Linkage,
>>> -                            const CXXRecordDecl *RD);
>>> -
>>>  /// GenerateConstructionVTable - Generate a construction vtable for the
>>> given
>>>  /// base subobject.
>>>  llvm::GlobalVariable *
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.h
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.h?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.h (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.h Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ class CodeGenModule : public CodeGenType
>>> 
>>>  /// VTables - Holds information about C++ vtables.
>>>  CodeGenVTables VTables;
>>> -  friend class CodeGenVTables;
>>> 
>>>  CGObjCRuntime* ObjCRuntime;
>>>  CGOpenCLRuntime* OpenCLRuntime;
>>> @@ -915,6 +914,10 @@ public:
>>> 
>>>  void EmitVTable(CXXRecordDecl *Class, bool DefinitionRequired);
>>> 
>>> +  /// EmitFundamentalRTTIDescriptors - Emit the RTTI descriptors for the
>>> +  /// builtin types.
>>> +  void EmitFundamentalRTTIDescriptors();
>>> +
>>>  /// \brief Appends Opts to the "Linker Options" metadata value.
>>>  void AppendLinkerOptions(StringRef Opts);
>>> 
>>> @@ -1068,10 +1071,6 @@ private:
>>>  /// given type.
>>>  void EmitFundamentalRTTIDescriptor(QualType Type);
>>> 
>>> -  /// EmitFundamentalRTTIDescriptors - Emit the RTTI descriptors for the
>>> -  /// builtin types.
>>> -  void EmitFundamentalRTTIDescriptors();
>>> -
>>>  /// EmitDeferred - Emit any needed decls for which code generation
>>>  /// was deferred.
>>>  void EmitDeferred();
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ using namespace CodeGen;
>>> 
>>> namespace {
>>> class ItaniumCXXABI : public CodeGen::CGCXXABI {
>>> +  /// VTables - All the vtables which have been defined.
>>> +  llvm::DenseMap<const CXXRecordDecl *, llvm::GlobalVariable *> VTables;
>>> +
>>> protected:
>>>  bool UseARMMethodPtrABI;
>>>  bool UseARMGuardVarABI;
>>> @@ -142,6 +145,20 @@ public:
>>>                           CallExpr::const_arg_iterator ArgBeg,
>>>                           CallExpr::const_arg_iterator ArgEnd);
>>> 
>>> +  void emitVTableDefinitions(CodeGenVTables &CGVT, const CXXRecordDecl
>>> *RD);
>>> +
>>> +  llvm::Value *getVTableAddressPointInStructor(
>>> +      CodeGenFunction &CGF, const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass,
>>> +      BaseSubobject Base, const CXXRecordDecl *NearestVBase,
>>> +      bool &NeedsVirtualOffset);
>>> +
>>> +  llvm::Constant *
>>> +  getVTableAddressPointForConstExpr(BaseSubobject Base,
>>> +                                    const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass);
>>> +
>>> +  llvm::GlobalVariable *getAddrOfVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>> +                                        CharUnits VPtrOffset);
>>> +
>>>  llvm::Value *getVirtualFunctionPointer(CodeGenFunction &CGF, GlobalDecl
>>> GD,
>>>                                         llvm::Value *This, llvm::Type *Ty);
>>> 
>>> @@ -150,8 +167,7 @@ public:
>>>                                 CXXDtorType DtorType, SourceLocation
>>> CallLoc,
>>>                                 llvm::Value *This);
>>> 
>>> -  void EmitVirtualInheritanceTables(llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes
>>> Linkage,
>>> -                                    const CXXRecordDecl *RD);
>>> +  void emitVirtualInheritanceTables(const CXXRecordDecl *RD);
>>> 
>>>  StringRef GetPureVirtualCallName() { return "__cxa_pure_virtual"; }
>>>  StringRef GetDeletedVirtualCallName() { return "__cxa_deleted_virtual"; }
>>> @@ -888,6 +904,113 @@ void ItaniumCXXABI::EmitConstructorCall(
>>>                        This, VTT, VTTTy, ArgBeg, ArgEnd);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> +void ItaniumCXXABI::emitVTableDefinitions(CodeGenVTables &CGVT,
>>> +                                          const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
>>> +  llvm::GlobalVariable *VTable = getAddrOfVTable(RD, CharUnits());
>>> +  if (VTable->hasInitializer())
>>> +    return;
>>> +
>>> +  VTableContext &VTContext = CGM.getVTableContext();
>>> +  const VTableLayout &VTLayout = VTContext.getVTableLayout(RD);
>>> +  llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes Linkage = CGM.getVTableLinkage(RD);
>>> +
>>> +  // Create and set the initializer.
>>> +  llvm::Constant *Init = CGVT.CreateVTableInitializer(
>>> +      RD, VTLayout.vtable_component_begin(),
>>> VTLayout.getNumVTableComponents(),
>>> +      VTLayout.vtable_thunk_begin(), VTLayout.getNumVTableThunks());
>>> +  VTable->setInitializer(Init);
>>> +
>>> +  // Set the correct linkage.
>>> +  VTable->setLinkage(Linkage);
>>> +
>>> +  // Set the right visibility.
>>> +  CGM.setTypeVisibility(VTable, RD, CodeGenModule::TVK_ForVTable);
>>> +
>>> +  // If this is the magic class __cxxabiv1::__fundamental_type_info,
>>> +  // we will emit the typeinfo for the fundamental types. This is the
>>> +  // same behaviour as GCC.
>>> +  const DeclContext *DC = RD->getDeclContext();
>>> +  if (RD->getIdentifier() &&
>>> +      RD->getIdentifier()->isStr("__fundamental_type_info") &&
>>> +      isa<NamespaceDecl>(DC) && cast<NamespaceDecl>(DC)->getIdentifier() &&
>>> +      cast<NamespaceDecl>(DC)->getIdentifier()->isStr("__cxxabiv1") &&
>>> +      DC->getParent()->isTranslationUnit())
>>> +    CGM.EmitFundamentalRTTIDescriptors();
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +llvm::Value *ItaniumCXXABI::getVTableAddressPointInStructor(
>>> +    CodeGenFunction &CGF, const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass, BaseSubobject
>>> Base,
>>> +    const CXXRecordDecl *NearestVBase, bool &NeedsVirtualOffset) {
>>> +  bool NeedsVTTParam = CGM.getCXXABI().NeedsVTTParameter(CGF.CurGD);
>>> +  NeedsVirtualOffset = (NeedsVTTParam && NearestVBase);
>>> +
>>> +  llvm::Value *VTableAddressPoint;
>>> +  if (NeedsVTTParam && (Base.getBase()->getNumVBases() || NearestVBase)) {
>>> +    // Get the secondary vpointer index.
>>> +    uint64_t VirtualPointerIndex =
>>> +        CGM.getVTables().getSecondaryVirtualPointerIndex(VTableClass,
>>> Base);
>>> +
>>> +    /// Load the VTT.
>>> +    llvm::Value *VTT = CGF.LoadCXXVTT();
>>> +    if (VirtualPointerIndex)
>>> +      VTT = CGF.Builder.CreateConstInBoundsGEP1_64(VTT,
>>> VirtualPointerIndex);
>>> +
>>> +    // And load the address point from the VTT.
>>> +    VTableAddressPoint = CGF.Builder.CreateLoad(VTT);
>>> +  } else {
>>> +    llvm::Constant *VTable =
>>> +        CGM.getCXXABI().getAddrOfVTable(VTableClass, CharUnits());
>>> +    uint64_t AddressPoint =
>>> CGM.getVTableContext().getVTableLayout(VTableClass)
>>> +        .getAddressPoint(Base);
>>> +    VTableAddressPoint =
>>> +        CGF.Builder.CreateConstInBoundsGEP2_64(VTable, 0, AddressPoint);
>>> +  }
>>> +
>>> +  return VTableAddressPoint;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +llvm::Constant *ItaniumCXXABI::getVTableAddressPointForConstExpr(
>>> +    BaseSubobject Base, const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass) {
>>> +  llvm::Constant *VTable = getAddrOfVTable(VTableClass, CharUnits());
>>> +
>>> +  // Find the appropriate vtable within the vtable group.
>>> +  uint64_t AddressPoint =
>>> +
>>> CGM.getVTableContext().getVTableLayout(VTableClass).getAddressPoint(Base);
>>> +  llvm::Value *Indices[] = {
>>> +    llvm::ConstantInt::get(CGM.Int64Ty, 0),
>>> +    llvm::ConstantInt::get(CGM.Int64Ty, AddressPoint)
>>> +  };
>>> +
>>> +  return llvm::ConstantExpr::getInBoundsGetElementPtr(VTable, Indices);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +llvm::GlobalVariable *ItaniumCXXABI::getAddrOfVTable(const CXXRecordDecl
>>> *RD,
>>> +                                                     CharUnits VPtrOffset)
>>> {
>>> +  assert(VPtrOffset.isZero() && "Itanium ABI only supports zero vptr
>>> offsets");
>>> +
>>> +  llvm::GlobalVariable *&VTable = VTables[RD];
>>> +  if (VTable)
>>> +    return VTable;
>>> +
>>> +  // Queue up this v-table for possible deferred emission.
>>> +  CGM.addDeferredVTable(RD);
>>> +
>>> +  SmallString<256> OutName;
>>> +  llvm::raw_svector_ostream Out(OutName);
>>> +  CGM.getCXXABI().getMangleContext().mangleCXXVTable(RD, Out);
>>> +  Out.flush();
>>> +  StringRef Name = OutName.str();
>>> +
>>> +  VTableContext &VTContext = CGM.getVTableContext();
>>> +  llvm::ArrayType *ArrayType = llvm::ArrayType::get(
>>> +      CGM.Int8PtrTy,
>>> VTContext.getVTableLayout(RD).getNumVTableComponents());
>>> +
>>> +  VTable = CGM.CreateOrReplaceCXXRuntimeVariable(
>>> +      Name, ArrayType, llvm::GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage);
>>> +  VTable->setUnnamedAddr(true);
>>> +  return VTable;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> llvm::Value *ItaniumCXXABI::getVirtualFunctionPointer(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
>>>                                                      GlobalDecl GD,
>>>                                                      llvm::Value *This,
>>> @@ -919,11 +1042,10 @@ void ItaniumCXXABI::EmitVirtualDestructo
>>>                        /*ImplicitParam=*/0, QualType(), 0, 0);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> -void ItaniumCXXABI::EmitVirtualInheritanceTables(
>>> -    llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes Linkage, const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
>>> +void ItaniumCXXABI::emitVirtualInheritanceTables(const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
>>>  CodeGenVTables &VTables = CGM.getVTables();
>>>  llvm::GlobalVariable *VTT = VTables.GetAddrOfVTT(RD);
>>> -  VTables.EmitVTTDefinition(VTT, Linkage, RD);
>>> +  VTables.EmitVTTDefinition(VTT, CGM.getVTableLinkage(RD), RD);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> void ARMCXXABI::EmitReturnFromThunk(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>> #include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
>>> #include "clang/AST/DeclCXX.h"
>>> #include "clang/AST/VTableBuilder.h"
>>> +#include "llvm/ADT/StringSet.h"
>>> 
>>> using namespace clang;
>>> using namespace CodeGen;
>>> @@ -150,6 +151,20 @@ public:
>>>                           CallExpr::const_arg_iterator ArgBeg,
>>>                           CallExpr::const_arg_iterator ArgEnd);
>>> 
>>> +  void emitVTableDefinitions(CodeGenVTables &CGVT, const CXXRecordDecl
>>> *RD);
>>> +
>>> +  llvm::Value *getVTableAddressPointInStructor(
>>> +      CodeGenFunction &CGF, const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass,
>>> +      BaseSubobject Base, const CXXRecordDecl *NearestVBase,
>>> +      bool &NeedsVirtualOffset);
>>> +
>>> +  llvm::Constant *
>>> +  getVTableAddressPointForConstExpr(BaseSubobject Base,
>>> +                                    const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass);
>>> +
>>> +  llvm::GlobalVariable *getAddrOfVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>> +                                        CharUnits VPtrOffset);
>>> +
>>>  llvm::Value *getVirtualFunctionPointer(CodeGenFunction &CGF, GlobalDecl
>>> GD,
>>>                                         llvm::Value *This, llvm::Type *Ty);
>>> 
>>> @@ -158,8 +173,7 @@ public:
>>>                                 CXXDtorType DtorType, SourceLocation
>>> CallLoc,
>>>                                 llvm::Value *This);
>>> 
>>> -  void EmitVirtualInheritanceTables(llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes
>>> Linkage,
>>> -                                    const CXXRecordDecl *RD);
>>> +  void emitVirtualInheritanceTables(const CXXRecordDecl *RD);
>>> 
>>>  void EmitGuardedInit(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const VarDecl &D,
>>>                       llvm::GlobalVariable *DeclPtr,
>>> @@ -303,7 +317,16 @@ public:
>>>                                  const MemberPointerType *MPT);
>>> 
>>> private:
>>> -  /// VBTables - All the vbtables which have been referenced.
>>> +  typedef std::pair<const CXXRecordDecl *, CharUnits> VFTableIdTy;
>>> +  typedef llvm::DenseMap<VFTableIdTy, llvm::GlobalVariable *>
>>> VFTablesMapTy;
>>> +  /// \brief All the vftables that have been referenced.
>>> +  VFTablesMapTy VFTablesMap;
>>> +
>>> +  /// \brief This set holds the record decls we've deferred vtable emission
>>> for.
>>> +  llvm::SmallPtrSet<const CXXRecordDecl *, 4> DeferredVFTables;
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +  /// \brief All the vbtables which have been referenced.
>>>  llvm::DenseMap<const CXXRecordDecl *, VBTableVector> VBTablesMap;
>>> 
>>>  /// Info on the global variable used to guard initialization of static
>>> locals.
>>> @@ -616,6 +639,116 @@ void MicrosoftCXXABI::EmitConstructorCal
>>>                        ImplicitParam, ImplicitParamTy, ArgBeg, ArgEnd);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> +void MicrosoftCXXABI::emitVTableDefinitions(CodeGenVTables &CGVT,
>>> +                                            const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
>>> +  MicrosoftVFTableContext &VFTContext = CGM.getVFTableContext();
>>> +  MicrosoftVFTableContext::VFPtrListTy VFPtrs =
>>> VFTContext.getVFPtrOffsets(RD);
>>> +  llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes Linkage = CGM.getVTableLinkage(RD);
>>> +
>>> +  for (MicrosoftVFTableContext::VFPtrListTy::iterator I = VFPtrs.begin(),
>>> +       E = VFPtrs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
>>> +    llvm::GlobalVariable *VTable = getAddrOfVTable(RD, I->VFPtrFullOffset);
>>> +    if (VTable->hasInitializer())
>>> +      continue;
>>> +
>>> +    const VTableLayout &VTLayout =
>>> +        VFTContext.getVFTableLayout(RD, I->VFPtrFullOffset);
>>> +    llvm::Constant *Init = CGVT.CreateVTableInitializer(
>>> +        RD, VTLayout.vtable_component_begin(),
>>> +        VTLayout.getNumVTableComponents(), VTLayout.vtable_thunk_begin(),
>>> +        VTLayout.getNumVTableThunks());
>>> +    VTable->setInitializer(Init);
>>> +
>>> +    VTable->setLinkage(Linkage);
>>> +    CGM.setTypeVisibility(VTable, RD, CodeGenModule::TVK_ForVTable);
>>> +  }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +llvm::Value *MicrosoftCXXABI::getVTableAddressPointInStructor(
>>> +    CodeGenFunction &CGF, const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass, BaseSubobject
>>> Base,
>>> +    const CXXRecordDecl *NearestVBase, bool &NeedsVirtualOffset) {
>>> +  NeedsVirtualOffset = (NearestVBase != 0);
>>> +
>>> +  llvm::Value *VTableAddressPoint =
>>> +      getAddrOfVTable(VTableClass, Base.getBaseOffset());
>>> +  if (!VTableAddressPoint) {
>>> +    assert(Base.getBase()->getNumVBases() &&
>>> +
>>> !CGM.getContext().getASTRecordLayout(Base.getBase()).hasOwnVFPtr());
>>> +  }
>>> +  return VTableAddressPoint;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void mangleVFTableName(CodeGenModule &CGM, const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
>>> +                              const VFPtrInfo &VFPtr, SmallString<256>
>>> &Name) {
>>> +  llvm::raw_svector_ostream Out(Name);
>>> +  CGM.getCXXABI().getMangleContext().mangleCXXVFTable(
>>> +      RD, VFPtr.PathToMangle, Out);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +llvm::Constant *MicrosoftCXXABI::getVTableAddressPointForConstExpr(
>>> +    BaseSubobject Base, const CXXRecordDecl *VTableClass) {
>>> +  llvm::Constant *VTable = getAddrOfVTable(VTableClass,
>>> Base.getBaseOffset());
>>> +  assert(VTable && "Couldn't find a vftable for the given base?");
>>> +  return VTable;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +llvm::GlobalVariable *MicrosoftCXXABI::getAddrOfVTable(const CXXRecordDecl
>>> *RD,
>>> +                                                       CharUnits
>>> VPtrOffset) {
>>> +  // getAddrOfVTable may return 0 if asked to get an address of a vtable
>>> which
>>> +  // shouldn't be used in the given record type. We want to cache this
>>> result in
>>> +  // VFTablesMap, thus a simple zero check is not sufficient.
>>> +  VFTableIdTy ID(RD, VPtrOffset);
>>> +  VFTablesMapTy::iterator I;
>>> +  bool Inserted;
>>> +  llvm::tie(I, Inserted) = VFTablesMap.insert(
>>> +      std::make_pair(ID, static_cast<llvm::GlobalVariable *>(0)));
>>> +  if (!Inserted)
>>> +    return I->second;
>>> +
>>> +  llvm::GlobalVariable *&VTable = I->second;
>>> +
>>> +  MicrosoftVFTableContext &VFTContext = CGM.getVFTableContext();
>>> +  const MicrosoftVFTableContext::VFPtrListTy &VFPtrs =
>>> +      VFTContext.getVFPtrOffsets(RD);
>>> +
>>> +  if (DeferredVFTables.insert(RD)) {
>>> +    // We haven't processed this record type before.
>>> +    // Queue up this v-table for possible deferred emission.
>>> +    CGM.addDeferredVTable(RD);
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef NDEBUG
>>> +    // Create all the vftables at once in order to make sure each vftable
>>> has
>>> +    // a unique mangled name.
>>> +    llvm::StringSet<> ObservedMangledNames;
>>> +    for (size_t J = 0, F = VFPtrs.size(); J != F; ++J) {
>>> +      SmallString<256> Name;
>>> +      mangleVFTableName(CGM, RD, VFPtrs[J], Name);
>>> +      if (!ObservedMangledNames.insert(Name.str()))
>>> +        llvm_unreachable("Already saw this mangling before?");
>>> +    }
>>> +#endif
>>> +  }
>>> +
>>> +  for (size_t J = 0, F = VFPtrs.size(); J != F; ++J) {
>>> +    if (VFPtrs[J].VFPtrFullOffset != VPtrOffset)
>>> +      continue;
>>> +
>>> +    llvm::ArrayType *ArrayType = llvm::ArrayType::get(
>>> +        CGM.Int8PtrTy,
>>> +        VFTContext.getVFTableLayout(RD, VFPtrs[J].VFPtrFullOffset)
>>> +            .getNumVTableComponents());
>>> +
>>> +    SmallString<256> Name;
>>> +    mangleVFTableName(CGM, RD, VFPtrs[J], Name);
>>> +    VTable = CGM.CreateOrReplaceCXXRuntimeVariable(
>>> +        Name.str(), ArrayType, llvm::GlobalValue::ExternalLinkage);
>>> +    VTable->setUnnamedAddr(true);
>>> +    break;
>>> +  }
>>> +
>>> +  return VTable;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> llvm::Value *MicrosoftCXXABI::getVirtualFunctionPointer(CodeGenFunction
>>> &CGF,
>>>                                                        GlobalDecl GD,
>>>                                                        llvm::Value *This,
>>> @@ -674,9 +807,10 @@ MicrosoftCXXABI::EnumerateVBTables(const
>>>  return VBTables;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> -void MicrosoftCXXABI::EmitVirtualInheritanceTables(
>>> -    llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes Linkage, const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
>>> +void MicrosoftCXXABI::emitVirtualInheritanceTables(const CXXRecordDecl *RD)
>>> {
>>>  const VBTableVector &VBTables = EnumerateVBTables(RD);
>>> +  llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes Linkage = CGM.getVTableLinkage(RD);
>>> +
>>>  for (VBTableVector::const_iterator I = VBTables.begin(), E =
>>> VBTables.end();
>>>       I != E; ++I) {
>>>    I->EmitVBTableDefinition(CGM, RD, Linkage);
>>> 
>>> Added: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-constexpr-vs-inheritance.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-constexpr-vs-inheritance.cpp?rev=191523&view=auto
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-constexpr-vs-inheritance.cpp
>>> (added)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-constexpr-vs-inheritance.cpp Fri
>>> Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
>>> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fno-rtti -emit-llvm %s -o - -cxx-abi
>>> microsoft -triple=i386-pc-win32 | FileCheck %s
>>> +
>>> +struct A {
>>> +  constexpr A(int x) : x(x) {}
>>> +  virtual void f();
>>> +  int x;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +A a(42);
>>> +// CHECK: @"\01?a@@3UA@@A" = global { [1 x i8*]*, i32 } { [1 x i8*]*
>>> @"\01??_7A@@6B@", i32 42 }, align 4
>>> +
>>> +struct B {
>>> +  constexpr B(int y) : y(y) {}
>>> +  virtual void g();
>>> +  int y;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct C : A, B {
>>> +  constexpr C() : A(777), B(13) {}
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +C c;
>>> +// CHECK: @"\01?c@@3UC@@A" = global { [1 x i8*]*, i32, [1 x i8*]*, i32 } {
>>> [1 x i8*]* @"\01??_7C@@6BA@@@", i32 777, [1 x i8*]* @"\01??_7C@@6BB@@@", i32
>>> 13 }
>>> 
>>> Modified:
>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> ---
>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> (original)
>>> +++
>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -145,3 +145,39 @@ void call_grandchild_right(GrandchildOve
>>>  // Just make sure we don't crash.
>>>  obj->right();
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +void emit_ctors() {
>>> +  Left l;
>>> +  // CHECK: define {{.*}} @"\01??0Left@@QAE at XZ"
>>> +  // CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
>>> +  // CHECK:   store [1 x i8*]* @"\01??_7Left@@6B@"
>>> +  // CHECK: ret
>>> +
>>> +  Right r;
>>> +  // CHECK: define {{.*}} @"\01??0Right@@QAE at XZ"
>>> +  // CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
>>> +  // CHECK:   store [1 x i8*]* @"\01??_7Right@@6B@"
>>> +  // CHECK: ret
>>> +
>>> +  ChildOverride co;
>>> +  // CHECK: define {{.*}} @"\01??0ChildOverride@@QAE at XZ"
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[THIS:.*]] = load %struct.ChildOverride**
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[VFPTR:.*]] = bitcast %struct.ChildOverride* %this1 to [1 x
>>> i8*]**
>>> +  // CHECK:   store [1 x i8*]* @"\01??_7ChildOverride@@6BLeft@@@", [1 x
>>> i8*]** %[[VFPTR]]
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[THIS_i8:.*]] = bitcast %struct.ChildOverride* %[[THIS]] to
>>> i8*
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[VFPTR_i8:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i8* %[[THIS_i8]],
>>> i32 4
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[VFPTR:.*]] = bitcast i8* %[[VFPTR_i8]] to [1 x i8*]**
>>> +  // CHECK:   store [1 x i8*]* @"\01??_7ChildOverride@@6BRight@@@", [1 x
>>> i8*]** %[[VFPTR]]
>>> +  // CHECK: ret
>>> +
>>> +  GrandchildOverride gc;
>>> +  // CHECK: define {{.*}} @"\01??0GrandchildOverride@@QAE at XZ"
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[THIS:.*]] = load %struct.GrandchildOverride**
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[VFPTR:.*]] = bitcast %struct.GrandchildOverride* %this1 to
>>> [1 x i8*]**
>>> +  // CHECK:   store [1 x i8*]* @"\01??_7GrandchildOverride@@6BLeft@@@", [1
>>> x i8*]** %[[VFPTR]]
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[THIS_i8:.*]] = bitcast %struct.GrandchildOverride*
>>> %[[THIS]] to i8*
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[VFPTR_i8:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i8* %[[THIS_i8]],
>>> i32 4
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[VFPTR:.*]] = bitcast i8* %[[VFPTR_i8]] to [1 x i8*]**
>>> +  // CHECK:   store [1 x i8*]* @"\01??_7GrandchildOverride@@6BRight@@@", [1
>>> x i8*]** %[[VFPTR]]
>>> +  // CHECK: ret
>>> +}
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp Fri Sep 27
>>> 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ void C::foo() {}
>>> void check_vftable_offset() {
>>>  C c;
>>> // The vftable pointer should point at the beginning of the vftable.
>>> -// CHECK: [[THIS_PTR:%[0-9]+]] = bitcast %"struct.basic::C"* {{.*}} to
>>> i8***
>>> -// CHECK: store i8** getelementptr inbounds ([2 x i8*]*
>>> @"\01??_7C at basic@@6B@", i64 0, i64 0), i8*** [[THIS_PTR]]
>>> +// CHECK: [[THIS_PTR:%[0-9]+]] = bitcast %"struct.basic::C"* {{.*}} to [2 x
>>> i8*]**
>>> +// CHECK: store [2 x i8*]* @"\01??_7C at basic@@6B@", [2 x i8*]** [[THIS_PTR]]
>>> }
>>> 
>>> void call_complete_dtor(C *obj_ptr) {
>>> @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ C::C() {
>>>  // CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[SKIP_VBASES]]
>>>  //
>>>  // CHECK: [[SKIP_VBASES]]
>>> -  // CHECK: @"\01??_7C at constructors@@6B@"
>>> +  // Class C does not define or override methods, so shouldn't change the
>>> vfptr.
>>> +  // CHECK-NOT: @"\01??_7C at constructors@@6B@"
>>>  // CHECK: ret
>>> }
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-virtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-virtual-inheritance.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-virtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-virtual-inheritance.cpp Fri Sep
>>> 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -7,10 +7,26 @@ struct VBase {
>>> };
>>> 
>>> struct B : virtual VBase {
>>> +  B();
>>>  virtual void foo();
>>>  virtual void bar();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> +B::B() {
>>> +  // CHECK: @"\01??0B@@QAE at XZ"
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[THIS:.*]] = load %struct.B**
>>> +  // CHECK:   br i1 %{{.*}}, label %[[INIT_VBASES:.*]], label
>>> %[[SKIP_VBASES:.*]]
>>> +  // CHECK: %[[SKIP_VBASES]]
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[THIS_i8:.*]] = bitcast %struct.B* %[[THIS]] to i8*
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[VBPTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i8* %[[THIS_i8]], i32
>>> 0
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[THIS_i8:.*]] = bitcast %struct.B* %[[THIS]] to i8*
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[VFPTR_i8:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i8* %[[THIS_i8]],
>>> i32 %{{.*}}
>>> +  // CHECK:   %[[VFPTR:.*]] = bitcast i8* %[[VFPTR_i8]] to [2 x i8*]**
>>> +  // CHECK:   store [2 x i8*]* @"\01??_7B@@6B@", [2 x i8*]** %[[VFPTR]]
>>> +  // FIXME: Should initialize the vtorDisp here.
>>> +  // CHECK: ret
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void B::foo() {
>>> // CHECK: define x86_thiscallcc void @"\01?foo at B@@UAEXXZ"(i8*
>>> //
>>> 
>>> Modified:
>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> ---
>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> (original)
>>> +++
>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-multiple-nonvirtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
>>> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=RET-THUNKS-Test4 %s < %t
>>> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=RET-THUNKS-Test5 %s < %t
>>> 
>>> +// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=MANGLING %s < %t
>>> +
>>> struct Empty {
>>>  // Doesn't have a vftable!
>>> };
>>> @@ -51,6 +53,9 @@ struct Test1: A, B {
>>>  // NO-THUNKS-Test1: VFTable indices for 'no_thunks::Test1' (1 entries)
>>>  // NO-THUNKS-Test1-NEXT: 0 | void no_thunks::Test1::f()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test1 at no_thunks@@6BA@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test1 at no_thunks@@6BB@@@"
>>> +
>>>  // Overrides only the left child's method (A::f), needs no thunks.
>>>  virtual void f();
>>> };
>>> @@ -102,6 +107,8 @@ struct Test4 : Empty, A {
>>>  // NO-THUNKS-Test4: VFTable indices for 'no_thunks::Test4' (1 entries).
>>>  // NO-THUNKS-Test4-NEXT: 0 | void no_thunks::Test4::f()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test4 at no_thunks@@6B@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void f();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> @@ -127,6 +134,11 @@ struct Test5: Test1, Test2 {
>>>  // NO-THUNKS-Test5: VFTable indices for 'no_thunks::Test5' (1 entries).
>>>  // NO-THUNKS-Test5-NEXT: 1 | void no_thunks::Test5::z()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test5 at no_thunks@@6BA@@Test1 at 1@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test5 at no_thunks@@6BA@@Test2 at 1@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test5 at no_thunks@@6BB@@Test1 at 1@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test5 at no_thunks@@6BB@@Test2 at 1@@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void z();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> @@ -143,6 +155,9 @@ struct Test6: Test1 {
>>>  // NO-THUNKS-Test6: VFTable indices for 'no_thunks::Test6' (1 entries).
>>>  // NO-THUNKS-Test6-NEXT: 0 | void no_thunks::Test6::f()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test6 at no_thunks@@6BA@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test6 at no_thunks@@6BB@@@"
>>> +
>>>  // Overrides both no_thunks::Test1::f and A::f.
>>>  virtual void f();
>>> };
>>> @@ -203,6 +218,9 @@ struct Test9: A, D {
>>>  // NO-THUNKS-Test9: VFTable indices for 'no_thunks::Test9' (1 entries).
>>>  // NO-THUNKS-Test9-NEXT: 1 | void no_thunks::Test9::h()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test9 at no_thunks@@6BA@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test9 at no_thunks@@6BD at 1@@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void h();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> @@ -228,6 +246,9 @@ struct Test1: A, D {
>>>  // PURE-VIRTUAL-Test1-NEXT: via vfptr at offset 4
>>>  // PURE-VIRTUAL-Test1-NEXT: 0 | void pure_virtual::Test1::g()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test1 at pure_virtual@@6BA@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test1 at pure_virtual@@6BD at 1@@"
>>> +
>>>  // Overrides only the right child's method (pure_virtual::D::g), needs
>>> this adjustment but
>>>  // not thunks.
>>>  virtual void g();
>>> @@ -254,6 +275,9 @@ struct Test1 : B, C {
>>>  // THIS-THUNKS-Test1: VFTable indices for 'this_adjustment::Test1' (1
>>> entries).
>>>  // THIS-THUNKS-Test1-NEXT: 0 | void this_adjustment::Test1::g()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test1 at this_adjustment@@6BB@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test1 at this_adjustment@@6BC@@@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void g();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> @@ -278,6 +302,10 @@ struct Test2 : A, B, C {
>>>  // THIS-THUNKS-Test2-NEXT: via vfptr at offset 4
>>>  // THIS-THUNKS-Test2-NEXT: 0 | void this_adjustment::Test2::g()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test2 at this_adjustment@@6BA@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test2 at this_adjustment@@6BB@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test2 at this_adjustment@@6BC@@@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void g();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> @@ -337,6 +365,8 @@ struct Test1 : Ret1 {
>>>  // RET-THUNKS-Test1: VFTable indices for 'return_adjustment::Test1' (1
>>> entries).
>>>  // RET-THUNKS-Test1-NEXT: 2 | this_adjustment::Test1
>>> *return_adjustment::Test1::foo()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Test1 at return_adjustment@@6B@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual this_adjustment::Test1* foo();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Modified:
>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-single-inheritance.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-single-inheritance.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-single-inheritance.cpp
>>> (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-single-inheritance.cpp
>>> Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>> // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fno-rtti -cxx-abi microsoft -triple=i386-pc-win32
>>> -emit-llvm -fdump-vtable-layouts -o - > %t 2>&1
>>> -// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=EMITS-VTABLE %s < %t
>>> -// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=NO-VTABLE %s < %t
>>> +// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=EMITS-VFTABLE %s < %t
>>> +// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=NO-VFTABLE %s < %t
>>> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-A %s < %t
>>> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-B %s < %t
>>> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-C %s < %t
>>> @@ -10,19 +10,12 @@
>>> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-G %s < %t
>>> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-I %s < %t
>>> 
>>> -// FIXME: Currently, we only test VFTableContext in the AST, but still use
>>> -// VTableContext for CodeGen. We should remove the "Vtable" checks below
>>> when we
>>> -// completely switch from VTableContext to VFTableContext.
>>> -// Currently, the order of Vtable vs VFTable output depends on whether the
>>> -// v*table info was required by a constructor or a method definition.
>>> -
>>> struct A {
>>>  // CHECK-A: VFTable for 'A' (3 entries)
>>>  // CHECK-A-NEXT: 0 | void A::f()
>>>  // CHECK-A-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>>  // CHECK-A-NEXT: 2 | void A::h()
>>> -
>>> -  // CHECK-A: Vtable for 'A' (3 entries)
>>> +  // CHECK-A: VFTable indices for 'A' (3 entries)
>>>  // CHECK-A-NEXT: 0 | void A::f()
>>>  // CHECK-A-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>>  // CHECK-A-NEXT: 2 | void A::h()
>>> @@ -33,20 +26,17 @@ struct A {
>>>  int ia;
>>> };
>>> A a;
>>> -// EMITS-VTABLE-DAG: @"\01??_7A@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant
>>> [3 x i8*]
>>> +// EMITS-VFTABLE-DAG: @"\01??_7A@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant
>>> [3 x i8*]
>>> 
>>> struct B : A {
>>> -  // CHECK-B: Vtable for 'B' (5 entries)
>>> +  // CHECK-B: VFTable for 'A' in 'B' (5 entries)
>>>  // CHECK-B-NEXT: 0 | void B::f()
>>>  // CHECK-B-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>>  // CHECK-B-NEXT: 2 | void A::h()
>>>  // CHECK-B-NEXT: 3 | void B::i()
>>>  // CHECK-B-NEXT: 4 | void B::j()
>>> -
>>> -  // CHECK-B: VFTable for 'A' in 'B' (5 entries)
>>> +  // CHECK-B: VFTable indices for 'B' (3 entries)
>>>  // CHECK-B-NEXT: 0 | void B::f()
>>> -  // CHECK-B-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>> -  // CHECK-B-NEXT: 2 | void A::h()
>>>  // CHECK-B-NEXT: 3 | void B::i()
>>>  // CHECK-B-NEXT: 4 | void B::j()
>>> 
>>> @@ -55,7 +45,7 @@ struct B : A {
>>>  virtual void j();
>>> };
>>> B b;
>>> -// EMITS-VTABLE-DAG: @"\01??_7B@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant
>>> [5 x i8*]
>>> +// EMITS-VFTABLE-DAG: @"\01??_7B@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant
>>> [5 x i8*]
>>> 
>>> struct C {
>>>  // CHECK-C: VFTable for 'C' (2 entries)
>>> @@ -65,25 +55,17 @@ struct C {
>>>  // CHECK-C-NEXT: 0 | C::~C() [scalar deleting]
>>>  // CHECK-C-NEXT: 1 | void C::f()
>>> 
>>> -  // CHECK-C: Vtable for 'C' (2 entries)
>>> -  // CHECK-C-NEXT: 0 | C::~C() [scalar deleting]
>>> -  // CHECK-C-NEXT: 1 | void C::f()
>>> -  // CHECK-C: VTable indices for 'C' (2 entries).
>>> -  // CHECK-C-NEXT: 0 | C::~C() [scalar deleting]
>>> -  // CHECK-C-NEXT: 1 | void C::f()
>>> -
>>>  virtual ~C();
>>>  virtual void f();
>>> };
>>> void C::f() {}
>>> -// NO-VTABLE-NOT: @"\01??_7C@@6B@"
>>> +// NO-VFTABLE-NOT: @"\01??_7C@@6B@"
>>> 
>>> struct D {
>>> -  // CHECK-D: Vtable for 'D' (2 entries)
>>> +  // CHECK-D: VFTable for 'D' (2 entries)
>>>  // CHECK-D-NEXT: 0 | void D::f()
>>>  // CHECK-D-NEXT: 1 | D::~D() [scalar deleting]
>>> -
>>> -  // CHECK-D: VFTable for 'D' (2 entries)
>>> +  // CHECK-D: VFTable indices for 'D' (2 entries)
>>>  // CHECK-D-NEXT: 0 | void D::f()
>>>  // CHECK-D-NEXT: 1 | D::~D() [scalar deleting]
>>> 
>>> @@ -91,7 +73,7 @@ struct D {
>>>  virtual ~D();
>>> };
>>> D d;
>>> -// EMITS-VTABLE-DAG: @"\01??_7D@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant
>>> [2 x i8*]
>>> +// EMITS-VFTABLE-DAG: @"\01??_7D@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant
>>> [2 x i8*]
>>> 
>>> struct E : A {
>>>  // CHECK-E: VFTable for 'A' in 'E' (5 entries)
>>> @@ -104,35 +86,15 @@ struct E : A {
>>>  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 3 | E::~E() [scalar deleting]
>>>  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 4 | void E::i()
>>> 
>>> -  // CHECK-E: Vtable for 'E' (5 entries)
>>> -  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 0 | void A::f()
>>> -  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>> -  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 2 | void A::h()
>>> -  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 3 | E::~E() [scalar deleting]
>>> -  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 4 | void E::i()
>>> -  // CHECK-E: VTable indices for 'E' (2 entries).
>>> -  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 3 | E::~E() [scalar deleting]
>>> -  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 4 | void E::i()
>>> -
>>>  // ~E would be the key method, but it isn't used, and MS ABI has no key
>>>  // methods.
>>>  virtual ~E();
>>>  virtual void i();
>>> };
>>> void E::i() {}
>>> -// NO-VTABLE-NOT: @"\01??_7E@@6B@"
>>> +// NO-VFTABLE-NOT: @"\01??_7E@@6B@"
>>> 
>>> struct F : A {
>>> -  // CHECK-F: Vtable for 'F' (5 entries)
>>> -  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 0 | void A::f()
>>> -  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>> -  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 2 | void A::h()
>>> -  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 3 | void F::i()
>>> -  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 4 | F::~F() [scalar deleting]
>>> -  // CHECK-F: VTable indices for 'F' (2 entries).
>>> -  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 3 | void F::i()
>>> -  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 4 | F::~F() [scalar deleting]
>>> -
>>>  // CHECK-F: VFTable for 'A' in 'F' (5 entries)
>>>  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 0 | void A::f()
>>>  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>> @@ -147,7 +109,7 @@ struct F : A {
>>>  virtual ~F();
>>> };
>>> F f;
>>> -// EMITS-VTABLE-DAG: @"\01??_7F@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant
>>> [5 x i8*]
>>> +// EMITS-VFTABLE-DAG: @"\01??_7F@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant
>>> [5 x i8*]
>>> 
>>> struct G : E {
>>>  // CHECK-G: VFTable for 'A' in 'E' in 'G' (6 entries)
>>> @@ -162,31 +124,19 @@ struct G : E {
>>>  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 3 | G::~G() [scalar deleting]
>>>  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 5 | void G::j()
>>> 
>>> -  // CHECK-G: Vtable for 'G' (6 entries)
>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 0 | void G::f()
>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 2 | void A::h()
>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 3 | G::~G() [scalar deleting]
>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 4 | void E::i()
>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 5 | void G::j()
>>> -  // CHECK-G: VTable indices for 'G' (3 entries).
>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 0 | void G::f()
>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 3 | G::~G() [scalar deleting]
>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 5 | void G::j()
>>> -
>>>  virtual void f();  // overrides A::f()
>>>  virtual ~G();
>>>  virtual void j();
>>> };
>>> void G::j() {}
>>> -// NO-VTABLE-NOT: @"\01??_7G@@6B@"
>>> +// NO-VFTABLE-NOT: @"\01??_7G@@6B@"
>>> 
>>> // Test that the usual Itanium-style key method does not emit a vtable.
>>> struct H {
>>>  virtual void f();
>>> };
>>> void H::f() {}
>>> -// NO-VTABLE-NOT: @"\01??_7H@@6B@"
>>> +// NO-VFTABLE-NOT: @"\01??_7H@@6B@"
>>> 
>>> struct Empty { };
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Modified:
>>> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance.cpp
>>> Fri Sep 27 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>>> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=RET-W %s < %t
>>> // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=RET-T %s < %t
>>> 
>>> +// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=MANGLING %s < %t
>>> +
>>> struct Empty { };
>>> 
>>> struct A {
>>> @@ -38,6 +40,8 @@ struct C: virtual A {
>>>  // VTABLE-C-NEXT: vbtable index 1, vfptr at offset 0
>>>  // VTABLE-C-NEXT: 0 | void C::f()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7C@@6B@"
>>> +
>>>  ~C();  // Currently required to have correct record layout, see PR16406
>>>  virtual void f();
>>> };
>>> @@ -58,6 +62,9 @@ struct D: virtual A {
>>>  // VTABLE-D-NEXT: via vbtable index 1, vfptr at offset 0
>>>  // VTABLE-D-NEXT: 0 | void D::f()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7D@@6B0@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7D@@6BA@@@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void f();
>>>  virtual void h();
>>> };
>>> @@ -71,6 +78,7 @@ struct X { int x; };
>>> 
>>> // X and A get reordered in the layout since X doesn't have a vfptr while A
>>> has.
>>> struct Y : X, A { };
>>> +// MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Y at Test1@@6B@"
>>> 
>>> struct Z : virtual Y {
>>>  // TEST1: VFTable for 'A' in 'Test1::Y' in 'Test1::Z' (2 entries).
>>> @@ -78,6 +86,8 @@ struct Z : virtual Y {
>>>  // TEST1-NEXT: 1 | void A::z()
>>> 
>>>  // TEST1-NOT: VFTable indices for 'Test1::Z'
>>> +
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Z at Test1@@6B@"
>>> };
>>> 
>>> Z z;
>>> @@ -99,6 +109,10 @@ struct X: virtual A, virtual B {
>>>  // TEST2: VFTable indices for 'Test2::X' (1 entries).
>>>  // TEST2-NEXT: 0 | void Test2::X::h()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at Test2@@6B01@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at Test2@@6BA@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at Test2@@6BB@@@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void h();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> @@ -107,7 +121,9 @@ X x;
>>> 
>>> namespace Test3 {
>>> 
>>> -struct X : virtual A { };
>>> +struct X : virtual A {
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at Test3@@6B@"
>>> +};
>>> 
>>> struct Y: virtual X {
>>>  // TEST3: VFTable for 'A' in 'Test3::X' in 'Test3::Y' (2 entries).
>>> @@ -115,6 +131,8 @@ struct Y: virtual X {
>>>  // TEST3-NEXT: 1 | void A::z()
>>> 
>>>  // TEST3-NOT: VFTable indices for 'Test3::Y'
>>> +
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Y at Test3@@6B@"
>>> };
>>> 
>>> Y y;
>>> @@ -134,6 +152,8 @@ struct X: virtual C {
>>>  // TEST4-NEXT: 1 | void A::z()
>>> 
>>>  // TEST4-NOT: VFTable indices for 'Test4::X'
>>> +
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at Test4@@6B@"
>>> };
>>> 
>>> X x;
>>> @@ -143,6 +163,7 @@ namespace Test5 {
>>> 
>>> // New methods are added to the base's vftable.
>>> struct X : A {
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at Test5@@6B@"
>>>  virtual void g();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> @@ -158,6 +179,9 @@ struct Y : virtual X {
>>>  // TEST5: VFTable indices for 'Test5::Y' (1 entries).
>>>  // TEST5-NEXT: 0 | void Test5::Y::h()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Y at Test5@@6B01@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Y at Test5@@6BX at 1@@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void h();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> @@ -172,6 +196,8 @@ struct X : A, virtual Empty {
>>>  // TEST6-NEXT: 1 | void A::z()
>>> 
>>>  // TEST6-NOT: VFTable indices for 'Test6::X'
>>> +
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at Test6@@6B@"
>>> };
>>> 
>>> X x;
>>> @@ -179,7 +205,9 @@ X x;
>>> 
>>> namespace Test7 {
>>> 
>>> -struct X : C { };
>>> +struct X : C {
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at Test7@@6B@"
>>> +};
>>> 
>>> struct Y : virtual X {
>>>  // TEST7: VFTable for 'A' in 'C' in 'Test7::X' in 'Test7::Y' (2 entries).
>>> @@ -191,6 +219,8 @@ struct Y : virtual X {
>>>  // TEST7-NEXT: 0 | this adjustment: 12 non-virtual
>>> 
>>>  // TEST7-NOT: VFTable indices for 'Test7::Y'
>>> +
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Y at Test7@@6B@"
>>> };
>>> 
>>> Y y;
>>> @@ -210,6 +240,9 @@ struct X : D, C {
>>>  // TEST8: VFTable indices for 'Test8::X' (1 entries).
>>>  // TEST8-NEXT: via vbtable index 1, vfptr at offset 0
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at Test8@@6BA@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at Test8@@6BD@@@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void f();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> @@ -231,6 +264,9 @@ struct Y : virtual X {
>>>  // TEST9-Y: VFTable indices for 'Test9::Y' (1 entries).
>>>  // TEST9-Y-NEXT: 0 | void Test9::Y::h()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Y at Test9@@6B01@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Y at Test9@@6BX at 1@@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void h();
>>> };
>>> 
>>> @@ -248,6 +284,13 @@ struct Z : Y, virtual B {
>>>  // TEST9-Z-NEXT: 0 | void B::g()
>>> 
>>>  // TEST9-Z-NOT: VFTable indices for 'Test9::Z'
>>> +
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Z at Test9@@6BX at 1@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Z at Test9@@6BY at 1@@"
>>> +
>>> +  // FIXME this one is wrong:
>>> +  // INCORRECT MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7Z at Test9@@6BB@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG-SHOULD-BE: @"\01??_7Z at Test9@@6B@"
>>> };
>>> 
>>> Z z;
>>> @@ -275,6 +318,16 @@ struct W : Z, D, virtual A, virtual B {
>>>  // TEST9-W-NEXT: 0 | this adjustment: -8 non-virtual
>>> 
>>>  // TEST9-W-NOT: VFTable indices for 'Test9::W'
>>> +
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7W at Test9@@6BA@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7W at Test9@@6BD@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7W at Test9@@6BX at 1@@"
>>> +
>>> +  // FIXME: these two are wrong:
>>> +  // INCORRECT MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7W at Test9@@6BB@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG-SHOULD-BE: @"\01??_7W at Test9@@6B@"
>>> +  // INCORRECT MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7W at Test9@@6BY at 1@Z at 1@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG-SHOULD-BE: @"\01??_7W at Test9@@6BY at 1@@"
>>> };
>>> 
>>> W w;
>>> @@ -320,6 +373,16 @@ struct T : Z, D, virtual A, virtual B {
>>>  // TEST9-T-NEXT: via vbtable index 2, vfptr at offset 0
>>>  // TEST9-T-NEXT: 0 | void Test9::T::g()
>>> 
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7T at Test9@@6BA@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7T at Test9@@6BD@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7T at Test9@@6BX at 1@@"
>>> +
>>> +  // FIXME: these two are wrong:
>>> +  // INCORRECT MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7T at Test9@@6BB@@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG-SHOULD-BE: @"\01??_7T at Test9@@6B@"
>>> +  // INCORRECT MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7T at Test9@@6BY at 1@Z at 1@@"
>>> +  // MANGLING-DAG-SHOULD-BE: @"\01??_7T at Test9@@6BY at 1@@"
>>> +
>>>  virtual void f();
>>>  virtual void g();
>>>  virtual void h();
>>> 
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/virtual-base-destructor-call.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/virtual-base-destructor-call.cpp?rev=191523&r1=191522&r2=191523&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/virtual-base-destructor-call.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/virtual-base-destructor-call.cpp Fri Sep 27
>>> 09:48:01 2013
>>> @@ -27,12 +27,6 @@ int main() {
>>> //  CHECK: call {{.*}} @_ZN13basic_istreamIcED2Ev
>>> //  CHECK: }
>>> 
>>> -// basic_iostream's deleting dtor calls its complete dtor, then
>>> -// operator delete().
>>> -//  CHECK: define linkonce_odr {{.*}}
>>> @_ZN14basic_iostreamIcED0Ev(%struct.basic_iostream* {{.*}}%this)
>>> unnamed_addr
>>> -//  CHECK: call {{.*}} @_ZN14basic_iostreamIcED1Ev
>>> -//  CHECK: call {{.*}} @_ZdlPv
>>> -
>>> // basic_istream's complete dtor calls the base dtor,
>>> // then its virtual base's base dtor.
>>> //  CHECK: define linkonce_odr {{.*}}
>>> @_ZN13basic_istreamIcED1Ev(%struct.basic_istream* {{.*}}%this) unnamed_addr
>>> @@ -45,6 +39,12 @@ int main() {
>>> //  CHECK: call {{.*}} @_ZN13basic_istreamIcED1Ev
>>> //  CHECK: call {{.*}} @_ZdlPv
>>> 
>>> +// basic_iostream's deleting dtor calls its complete dtor, then
>>> +// operator delete().
>>> +//  CHECK: define linkonce_odr {{.*}}
>>> @_ZN14basic_iostreamIcED0Ev(%struct.basic_iostream* {{.*}}%this)
>>> unnamed_addr
>>> +//  CHECK: call {{.*}} @_ZN14basic_iostreamIcED1Ev
>>> +//  CHECK: call {{.*}} @_ZdlPv
>>> +
>>> // basic_istream's base dtor is a no-op.
>>> //  CHECK: define linkonce_odr {{.*}}
>>> @_ZN13basic_istreamIcED2Ev(%struct.basic_istream* {{.*}}%this, i8** %vtt)
>>> unnamed_addr
>>> //  CHECK-NOT: call
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>> 
>>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130927/06110fa1/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list