[PATCH] Request for approval to commit: [libclang] Expose DecayedType

[Anders Waldenborg]

> >> Since libclang is supposed to be somewhat higher level and closer to the source, could we just report a DecayedType as the original (as written) one ?
> >> Or do you have a specific use case where you need to know that it is a DecayedType ?
> > 
> > Not really. So something like attached patch instead?
> 
> Yes, could you also add a test in test/Index/print-type.cpp ?

test/Index/print-type.cpp already had a test. In c++ that is not
exposed as an DecayedType. So added test in test/Index/print-type.c
instead.


thanks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hide-decayed-thirdtimesacharm.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 3669 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130914/d0de7623/attachment.patch>