[PATCH] Correctly record "used" markings in AST files which reference other AST files

Richard Smith richard at metafoo.co.uk
Tue Sep 3 18:20:07 PDT 2013


Seems completely reasonable to me. I have a slight preference for the test
to check that we actually emit the definition of SPXTrace (there are
various ways we could still get this completely wrong and pass this test
anyway), but LGTM either way.


On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Patch attached.  I think this is mostly straightforward, but I'l like to
> get this reviewed by someone more familiar with the serialization code.
>
> Fixes PR16635.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130903/5664e983/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list