r189542 - use the last passed -munaligned-access / -mno-unaligned-access
Manish Verma
manish.verma at arm.com
Mon Sep 2 07:02:46 PDT 2013
Renato,
A few of the unit tests use the incorrect ABI token (gnueeabi) in the target
triple. [notice the extra "e"]
Regards,
Manish
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cfe-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:cfe-commits-
> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Renato Golin
> Sent: 29 August 2013 10:06
> To: Hal Finkel
> Cc: Clang Commits
> Subject: Re: r189542 - use the last passed -munaligned-access / -mno-
> unaligned-access
>
> Hal,
>
> Absolutely, I think the reason why it's there is that we didn't know
> better. Please, check with Jeroen for a revised patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Renato
>
> On 29 Aug 2013 04:50, "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Author: rengolin
> > Date: Wed Aug 28 18:56:07 2013
> > New Revision: 189542
> >
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=189542&view=rev
> > Log:
> > use the last passed -munaligned-access / -mno-unaligned-
> access
> >
> > Passing inconsistent munaligned-access / mno-unaligned-
> access
> > flags, intentionally resulted in a warning and the flag
> > no-unaligned-access being used.
> >
> > Gcc does, at least in practice, use the last flag in such a
> > case. This patch updates clang behaviour accordingly; use
> the
> > last flag or base alignment behaviour on the target (which
> > llvm will do if no flag is explicitly passed)
> >
> > Patch by Jeroen Hofstee.
> >
> > Modified:
> > cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp
> > cfe/trunk/test/Driver/arm-alignment.c
> >
> > Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp
> > URL:
> > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-
> project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?rev=189542&r1=189541&r2=189542
> &view=diff
> >
> =====================================================================
> =========
> > --- cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp (original)
> > +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp Wed Aug 28 18:56:07 2013
> > @@ -2944,12 +2944,15 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation
> &C,
> > }
> > // -mkernel implies -mstrict-align; don't add the
> redundant
> > option.
> > if (!KernelOrKext) {
> > - if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access)) {
> > - CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option");
> > - CmdArgs.push_back("-arm-strict-align");
> > - } else if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_munaligned_access))
> {
> > - CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option");
> > - CmdArgs.push_back("-arm-no-strict-align");
> > + if (Arg *A =
> Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access,
> > +
> options::OPT_munaligned_access)) {
> > + if (A-
> >getOption().matches(options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access))
> > {
> > + CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option");
> > + CmdArgs.push_back("-arm-strict-align");
> > + } else {
> > + CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option");
> > + CmdArgs.push_back("-arm-no-strict-align");
>
> From what Chandler tells me, using -backend-option plays
> horribly when the compiler is used via the tooling interface, and
> should really be avoided. This seems like something that belongs in
> TargetOptions; can we move it there?
>
> -Hal
>
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
> > Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Driver/arm-alignment.c
> > URL:
> > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-
> project/cfe/trunk/test/Driver/arm-
> alignment.c?rev=189542&r1=189541&r2=189542&view=diff
> >
> =====================================================================
> =========
> > --- cfe/trunk/test/Driver/arm-alignment.c (original)
> > +++ cfe/trunk/test/Driver/arm-alignment.c Wed Aug 28
> 18:56:07 2013
> > @@ -1,9 +1,25 @@
> > // RUN: %clang -target arm-none-gnueeabi -munaligned-access
> -### %s
> > 2> %t
> > // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNALIGNED < %t %s
> >
> > +// RUN: %clang -target arm-none-gnueeabi -mstrict-align
> > -munaligned-access -### %s 2> %t
> > +// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNALIGNED < %t %s
> > +
> > +// RUN: %clang -target arm-none-gnueeabi -mno-unaligned-
> access
> > -munaligned-access -### %s 2> %t
> > +// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNALIGNED < %t %s
> > +
> > // CHECK-UNALIGNED: "-backend-option" "-arm-no-strict-
> align"
> >
> > +
> > // RUN: %clang -target arm-none-gnueeabi -mno-unaligned-
> access -###
> > %s 2> %t
> > // RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ALIGNED < %t %s
> >
> > +// RUN: %clang -target arm-none-gnueeabi -mstrict-align -
> ### %s 2>
> > %t
> > +// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ALIGNED < %t %s
> > +
> > +// RUN: %clang -target arm-none-gnueabi -munaligned-access
> > -mno-unaligned-access -### %s 2> %t
> > +// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ALIGNED < %t %s
> > +
> > +// RUN: %clang -target arm-none-gnueabi -munaligned-access
> > -mstrict-align -### %s 2> %t
> > +// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ALIGNED < %t %s
> > +
> > // CHECK-ALIGNED: "-backend-option" "-arm-strict-align"
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-commits mailing list
> > cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
> >
>
> --
> Hal Finkel
> Assistant Computational Scientist
> Leadership Computing Facility
> Argonne National Laboratory
>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list