r189110 - Respect -Wnewline-eof even in C++11 mode.

[Dmitri Gribenko]

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/newline-eof.c
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/newline-eof.c?rev=189110&r1=189109&r2=189110&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/newline-eof.c (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/newline-eof.c Fri Aug 23 10:42:01 2013
> @@ -1,9 +1,15 @@
> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wnewline-eof -verify %s
> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wnewline-eof %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
> +// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -Wnewline-eof -verify %s
> +// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -pedantic -verify %s
> +// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -x c++ -std=c++03 -pedantic -verify %s
> +// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -Wnewline-eof %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
>  // rdar://9133072
>
> +// In C++11 mode, this is allowed, so don't warn in pedantic mode.
> +// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -x c++ -std=c++11 -Wnewline-eof -verify %s

Why not %clang_cc1?

> +// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -x c++ -std=c++11 -pedantic %s

Will this RUN line fail if we emit the warning?  Maybe add -Werror?

Dmitri

-- 
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/