[PATCH] Aarch64 Neon ACLE scalar instrinsic name mangling with BHSD suffix

[Ana Pazos]

Thanks a lot Kevin, will try now.

Ana.

 

From: Kevin Qin [mailto:kevinqindev at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 7:02 PM
To: Ana Pazos
Cc: Joey Gouly; Jiangning Liu; Hao Liu; llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu;
cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Aarch64 Neon ACLE scalar instrinsic name mangling with
BHSD suffix

 

Hi Ana,

 

Sorry for that mistake. I merged and tested my patch on our daily updated
internal repo. So it may have latency with truck and just missed Hao's patch
at the time I merged my patch. Here is the patch rebased on truck now.
Please try again. Thanks.

 

2013/8/21 Ana Pazos <apazos at codeaurora.org>

Hi Kevin,

 

I am trying your patch now.

The first thing I noticed is that the patch does not merge cleanly.

It seems you do not have Hao's previous clang commit
(http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision
<http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=188452>
&revision=188452 -Clang and AArch64 backend patches to support shll/shl and
vmovl instructions and ACLE function).

Can you rebase and repost your patch?

 

Thanks,

Ana.

 

 

From: cfe-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
[mailto:cfe-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Kevin Qin
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 2:43 AM
To: Joey Gouly
Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Aarch64 Neon ACLE scalar instrinsic name mangling with
BHSD suffix

 

Hi Joey,

 

   Thanks a lot for your suggestions. I improved my patch as your good
advice. I wish to implement some of ACLE intrinsic based on my patch as
test, but the full implementation of one ACLE intrinsic need to commit on
both llvm and clang. More important thing is,  all scalar ACLE intrinsic are
classified to different tables, and these tables are implemented in parallel
but none of them is accomplished.  There are complex dependence among
intrinsic and may be rewrite frequently.  The main purpose posting this
patch at moment is to decrease overlap on such base module and make our
parallel development more efficient.

 

Best Regards,

Kevin Qin

 

2013/8/16 Joey Gouly <joey.gouly at arm.com>

Hi Kevin,

Clang patches should be sent to cfe-commits. I cc'd them in for you.

You could test this patch by including an ACLE function that you have
implemented, that way we can see it works. Or if you are going to submit
those soon, maybe it can go in without a test for now. Let's see what others
think about that.

Just two minor points.

> +static std::string Insert_BHSD_Suffix(StringRef typestr){

This should just return a 'char'.

> +/// Insert proper 'b' 'h' 's' 'd' behind function name if prefix 'S' is
used.
Can you change that to something like
  Insert proper 'b', 'h', 's', 'd' suffix if 'S' prefix is used.

Thanks

From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
[mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Kevin Qin
Sent: 16 August 2013 10:46
To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: [PATCH] Aarch64 Neon ACLE scalar instrinsic name mangling with BHSD
suffix


This patch is used to add 'bhsd' suffix in Neon ACLE scalar function name.
1. A new type prefix 'S' is defined in
tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/arm_neon.td, which is used to mark whether
enable 'bhsd' suffix mangle.
2. If prefix 'S' is found before data type, proper suffix will be added
according below rule:
Data Type  Suffix
  i8 -> b
  i16 -> h
  i32 f32 -> s
  i64 f64 -> d
 
For example,
If we define a new ACLE function in arm_neon.td like:
 
def FABD : SInst<"vabd", "sss",  "ScSsSiSlSfSd">
 
Then, rebuild llvm. We would see below in
INSTALL_PATH/lib/clang/3.4/include/arm_neon.h
 
__ai int8_t vabdb_s8(int8_t __a, int8_t __b) {
  return (int8_t)__builtin_neon_vabdb_s8(__a, __b); }
__ai int16_t vabdh_s16(int16_t __a, int16_t __b) {
  return (int16_t)__builtin_neon_vabdh_s8(__a, __b); }
.
 
Proper suffix is inserted in both ACLE intrinsics and builtin functions.
 
Because this patch only works on llvm building time, so I have no idea on
writing test case for this patch. Fortunately, this patch won't effect on
any already defined ACLE functions, for its function depending on the new
defined prefix 'S'. So It is safe for current system and is developed to
help implement new scalar ACLE intrinsics in parallel.
 
You can see each scalar ACLE function corresponds to an unique builtin
function. At beginning, I planned to let series of ACLE functions with the
same semantics reuse one builtin function. But this would introduce extra
unnecessary convert expression in IR, for different data types have
different data width. If I promote all data types to i64 and use single
builtin function, then there will be only an i64 version builtin function
existing in IR. Though I can add extra arg in builtin function to record the
original data type, but extra data convert IR(sign extension before call and
truncation after call) still exists. This will increase the difficulty in
coding lower patterns in backend.
 







 

-- 

Best Regards,

 

Kevin Qin





 

-- 

Best Regards,

 

Kevin Qin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130820/652824eb/attachment.html>