[PATCH] explicit GNU flags
Eli Friedman
eli.friedman at gmail.com
Fri Aug 16 23:59:05 PDT 2013
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Peter N Lewis <peter at stairways.com.au>wrote:
> On 17/08/2013, at 5:22 , Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > diag::ext_gnu_local_label shouldn't exist; it's not something we need to
> diagnose.
>
> Is it not a GNU extension to have local labels?
>
Yes.
> Are you suggesting the I delete the diagnostic for local labels, or not
> add the explicit flag for that diagnostic?
>
I'm suggesting you delete the diagnostic altogether; __label__ is in the
implementation-reserved namespace.
-Eli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130816/d2e885bc/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list