r188112 - Fix for PR16570: when comparing two function pointers, discard qualifiers when
Richard Trieu
rtrieu at google.com
Fri Aug 9 14:42:32 PDT 2013
Author: rtrieu
Date: Fri Aug 9 16:42:32 2013
New Revision: 188112
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=188112&view=rev
Log:
Fix for PR16570: when comparing two function pointers, discard qualifiers when
comparing non-reference function parameters. The qualifiers don't matter for
comparisons.
This is a re-commit of r187769, which was accidentially reverted in r187770,
with a simplification at the suggestion of Eli Friedman.
Added:
cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/function-pointer-arguments.cpp
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp?rev=188112&r1=188111&r2=188112&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp Fri Aug 9 16:42:32 2013
@@ -2584,7 +2584,8 @@ bool Sema::FunctionArgTypesAreEqual(cons
for (FunctionProtoType::arg_type_iterator O = OldType->arg_type_begin(),
N = NewType->arg_type_begin(),
E = OldType->arg_type_end(); O && (O != E); ++O, ++N) {
- if (!Context.hasSameType(*O, *N)) {
+ if (!Context.hasSameType(O->getUnqualifiedType(),
+ N->getUnqualifiedType())) {
if (ArgPos) *ArgPos = O - OldType->arg_type_begin();
return false;
}
Added: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/function-pointer-arguments.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/function-pointer-arguments.cpp?rev=188112&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/function-pointer-arguments.cpp (added)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/function-pointer-arguments.cpp Fri Aug 9 16:42:32 2013
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+//RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+namespace PR16570 {
+ int f1(int, int);
+ int f2(const int, int);
+ int f3(int&, int);
+ int f4(const int&, int);
+
+ void good() {
+ int(*g1)(int, int) = f1;
+ int(*g2)(const int, int) = f1;
+ int(*g3)(volatile int, int) = f1;
+ int(*g4)(int, int) = f2;
+ int(*g5)(const int, int) = f2;
+ int(*g6)(volatile int, int) = f2;
+ int(*g7)(int&, int) = f3;
+ int(*g8)(const int&, int) = f4;
+ }
+
+ void bad() {
+ void (*g1)(int, int) = f1;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{different return type ('void' vs 'int'}}
+ const int (*g2)(int, int) = f1;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{different return type ('const int' vs 'int')}}
+
+ int (*g3)(char, int) = f1;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{type mismatch at 1st parameter ('char' vs 'int')}}
+ int (*g4)(int, char) = f1;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{type mismatch at 2nd parameter ('char' vs 'int')}}
+
+ int (*g5)(int) = f1;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{different number of parameters (1 vs 2)}}
+
+ int (*g6)(int, int, int) = f1;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{different number of parameters (3 vs 2)}}
+
+ int (*g7)(const int, char) = f1;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{type mismatch at 2nd parameter ('char' vs 'int')}}
+ int (*g8)(int, char) = f2;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{type mismatch at 2nd parameter ('char' vs 'int')}}
+ int (*g9)(const int&, char) = f3;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{type mismatch at 1st parameter ('const int &' vs 'int &')}}
+ int (*g10)(int&, char) = f4;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{type mismatch at 1st parameter ('int &' vs 'const int &')}}
+ }
+
+ typedef void (*F)(const char * __restrict__, int);
+ void g(const char *, unsigned);
+ F f = g;
+ // expected-error at -1 {{type mismatch at 2nd parameter ('int' vs 'unsigned int')}}
+
+}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list