XFAIL Headers/cxx11.cpp for Hexagon

[Jyotsna Verma]

Thanks Richard! -ffreestanding takes care of the problem.

-Jyotsna

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by
The Linux Foundation


>-----Original Message-----
>From: metafoo at gmail.com [mailto:metafoo at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>Richard Smith
>Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 4:55 PM
>To: Jyotsna Verma
>Cc: cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>Subject: Re: XFAIL Headers/cxx11.cpp for Hexagon
>
>On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Jyotsna Verma <jverma at codeaurora.org>
>wrote:
>>>I would still like an explanation of the nature of the failure. Which
>> header or
>>>#include is problematic? Also, this isn't really a C++11 test, it's a
>>>test
>> for our
>>>built-in headers, and even if it were, I don't see why it'd be
>>>reasonable
>> to
>>>XFAIL C++11 tests for Hexagon.
>>
>> We do define __STDC_HOSTED__ for Hexagon which probably shouldn't be.
>> The test includes stdint.h file from lib/Headers which in turn
>> includes system stdint.h if __STDC_HOSTED__ macro is defined. In
>> addition, it also requires some other system headers such as
>> features.h, bits/predefs.h and gnu/stubs-32.h. There is no way for us
>> to make these header files available in the build area.
>
>Does this help:
>
>Index: test/Headers/cxx11.cpp
>===========================================================
>========
>--- test/Headers/cxx11.cpp      (revision 185111)
>+++ test/Headers/cxx11.cpp      (working copy)
>@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>-// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 %s -// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -
>std=c++11 -fmodules %s
>+// RUN: %clang -ffreestanding -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 %s // RUN:
>+%clang -ffreestanding -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -fmodules %s
>
> #include <stdalign.h>