[PATCH] Fix parsing comma in default arguments.
Richard Smith
richard at metafoo.co.uk
Thu Jun 13 17:40:25 PDT 2013
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Olivier Goffart <ogoffart at kde.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 June 2013 16:30:22 Eli Friedman wrote:
>> > > > Also a template argument can contains = for example in this case:
>> > > > struct S {constexpr S(){}; constexpr int operator=(int) const {return
>> > > > 5;}};
>> > > > template <int> struct A {};
>> > > > constexpr S s;
>> > > > A<s=4> a;
>> > >
>> > > This is ill-formed.
>> >
>> > Why?
>> > the operator= is a constexpr
>>
>> It isn't a question of what operator= resolves to; the issue is that the
>> grammar doesn't allow an '=' in that spot. See [gram.expr].
>
> Ah, right.
>
> But this would be valid:
> A<false ? s=1 : s=4 > a;
Yes, it would.
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list