[PATCH] [libc++] Use snprintf() instead of sprintf()
Matthew Dempsky
matthew at dempsky.org
Fri Jun 7 19:57:05 PDT 2013
In libc++'s <locale>, there's already dependence on an snprintf_l
implementation and all of the char buffers readily have their
allocated size available, so we can easily use snprintf_l instead of
sprintf_l.
This avoids OpenBSD's linker warnings against using sprintf and
vsprintf.
Index: include/locale
===================================================================
--- include/locale (revision 183583)
+++ include/locale (working copy)
@@ -357,20 +357,6 @@ size_t __mbsrtowcs_l(wchar_t *__dest, const char *
}
inline
-int __sprintf_l(char *__s, locale_t __l, const char *__format, ...) {
- va_list __va;
- va_start(__va, __format);
-#ifdef _LIBCPP_LOCALE__L_EXTENSIONS
- int __res = vsprintf_l(__s, __l, __format, __va);
-#else
- __locale_raii __current(uselocale(__l), uselocale);
- int __res = vsprintf(__s, __format, __va);
-#endif
- va_end(__va);
- return __res;
-}
-
-inline
int __snprintf_l(char *__s, size_t __n, locale_t __l, const char *__format, ...) {
va_list __va;
va_start(__va, __format);
@@ -1803,9 +1789,9 @@ num_put<_CharT, _OutputIterator>::do_put(iter_type
+ 1;
char __nar[__nbuf];
#ifdef _LIBCPP_LOCALE__L_EXTENSIONS
- int __nc = sprintf_l(__nar, _LIBCPP_GET_C_LOCALE, __fmt, __v);
+ int __nc = snprintf_l(__nar, __nbuf, _LIBCPP_GET_C_LOCALE, __fmt, __v);
#else
- int __nc = __sprintf_l(__nar, __cloc(), __fmt, __v);
+ int __nc = __snprintf_l(__nar, __nbuf, __cloc(), __fmt, __v);
#endif
char* __ne = __nar + __nc;
char* __np = this->__identify_padding(__nar, __ne, __iob);
@@ -1833,9 +1819,9 @@ num_put<_CharT, _OutputIterator>::do_put(iter_type
+ 1;
char __nar[__nbuf];
#ifdef _LIBCPP_LOCALE__L_EXTENSIONS
- int __nc = sprintf_l(__nar, _LIBCPP_GET_C_LOCALE, __fmt, __v);
+ int __nc = snprintf_l(__nar, __nbuf, _LIBCPP_GET_C_LOCALE, __fmt, __v);
#else
- int __nc = __sprintf_l(__nar, __cloc(), __fmt, __v);
+ int __nc = __snprintf_l(__nar, __nbuf, __cloc(), __fmt, __v);
#endif
char* __ne = __nar + __nc;
char* __np = this->__identify_padding(__nar, __ne, __iob);
@@ -1863,9 +1849,9 @@ num_put<_CharT, _OutputIterator>::do_put(iter_type
+ 1;
char __nar[__nbuf];
#ifdef _LIBCPP_LOCALE__L_EXTENSIONS
- int __nc = sprintf_l(__nar, _LIBCPP_GET_C_LOCALE, __fmt, __v);
+ int __nc = snprintf_l(__nar, __nbuf, _LIBCPP_GET_C_LOCALE, __fmt, __v);
#else
- int __nc = __sprintf_l(__nar, __cloc(), __fmt, __v);
+ int __nc = __snprintf_l(__nar, __nbuf, __cloc(), __fmt, __v);
#endif
char* __ne = __nar + __nc;
char* __np = this->__identify_padding(__nar, __ne, __iob);
@@ -1893,9 +1879,9 @@ num_put<_CharT, _OutputIterator>::do_put(iter_type
+ 1;
char __nar[__nbuf];
#ifdef _LIBCPP_LOCALE__L_EXTENSIONS
- int __nc = sprintf_l(__nar, _LIBCPP_GET_C_LOCALE, __fmt, __v);
+ int __nc = snprintf_l(__nar, __nbuf, _LIBCPP_GET_C_LOCALE, __fmt, __v);
#else
- int __nc = __sprintf_l(__nar, __cloc(), __fmt, __v);
+ int __nc = __snprintf_l(__nar, __nbuf, __cloc(), __fmt, __v);
#endif
char* __ne = __nar + __nc;
char* __np = this->__identify_padding(__nar, __ne, __iob);
@@ -2057,9 +2043,9 @@ num_put<_CharT, _OutputIterator>::do_put(iter_type
const unsigned __nbuf = 20;
char __nar[__nbuf];
#ifdef _LIBCPP_LOCALE__L_EXTENSIONS
- int __nc = sprintf_l(__nar, _LIBCPP_GET_C_LOCALE, __fmt, __v);
+ int __nc = snprintf_l(__nar, __nbuf, _LIBCPP_GET_C_LOCALE, __fmt, __v);
#else
- int __nc = __sprintf_l(__nar, __cloc(), __fmt, __v);
+ int __nc = __snprintf_l(__nar, __nbuf, __cloc(), __fmt, __v);
#endif
char* __ne = __nar + __nc;
char* __np = this->__identify_padding(__nar, __ne, __iob);
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list