[PATCH] Warn on suspicious increments/decrements in for loops

[Richard Smith]

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Richard Trieu <rtrieu at google.com> wrote:

>
>   @jordan_rose, I want this warning.  Not sure about other people
>
>   @gribozavr, earlier versions of this did trigger on LLVM and Clang.  The
> warning has been fine-tuned since then to avoid those false positives.
>
>   Also, I seemed to have messed up the indentation when I wrote the
> visitors for the first -Wloop-analysis warning and managed to copy the bad
> indentation over to this change.  I will go fix them.


Does this find any other bugs (or false positives) in other code you've run
it on?


> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D628
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130531/41300695/attachment.html>