r179949 - VLAs in C++14!

[Stephen Lin]

Oh dear, are they adopting the runtime-evaluated "sizeof" too??

On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Richard Smith
<richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Author: rsmith
> Date: Sat Apr 20 08:20:33 2013
> New Revision: 179949
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=179949&view=rev
> Log:
> VLAs in C++14!
>
> Modified:
>     cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html?rev=179949&r1=179948&r2=179949&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/www/cxx_status.html Sat Apr 20 08:20:33 2013
> @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ available.</p>
>        <td class="none" align="center">No</td>
>      </tr>
>      <tr>
> -      <td>[PROVISIONAL] Runtime-sized arrays with automatic storage duration</td>
> +      <td>Runtime-sized arrays with automatic storage duration</td>
>        <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3639.html">N3639</a></td>
>        <td class="none" align="center">Partial</td>
>      </tr>
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ available.</p>
>      <tr>
>        <td>Clarifying memory allocation</td>
>        <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3664.html">N3664</a></td>
> -      <td class="none" align="center">No</td>
> +      <td class="none" align="center">Partial</td>
>      </tr>
>  </table>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits