[patch] Don't compute a "patched" storage class

Rafael EspĂ­ndola rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Sat Apr 13 15:10:35 PDT 2013

> Looks like "as written" is a somewhat fuzzy concept for
> instantiations. Maybe it would be more regular to say that a
> instantiated function gets a static storage class if the template
> isStatic()? That should allow us to remove the
> getTemplateSpecializationInfo in isStatic().

The attached patch does it. Do you think it is an improvement?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: t.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1655 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130413/6e661478/attachment.obj>

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list