r178543 - Fixed "fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label" warning in

Jordan Rose jordan_rose at apple.com
Tue Apr 2 10:18:51 PDT 2013


Yes, this looks better, please commit.

On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:17 , Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote:

> No, there are no serious reasons for this. I can move it to the main test file for the feature. Please take a look at the patch:
> 
> Index: test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough-regression.cpp
> ===================================================================
> --- test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough-regression.cpp	(revision 178546)
> +++ test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough-regression.cpp	(working copy)
> @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 -Wimplicit-fallthrough %s
> -
> -void f() {
> -  class C {
> -    void f(int x) {
> -      switch (x) {
> -        case 0:
> -          x++;
> -          [[clang::fallthrough]]; // expected-no-diagnostics
> -        case 1:
> -          x++;
> -          break;
> -      }
> -    }
> -  };
> -}
> -
> Index: test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough.cpp
> ===================================================================
> --- test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough.cpp	(revision 178546)
> +++ test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough.cpp	(working copy)
> @@ -247,3 +247,21 @@
>    }
>    return n;
>  }
> +
> +// Fallthrough annotations in local classes used to generate "fallthrough
> +// annotation does not directly precede switch label" warning.
> +void fallthrough_in_local_class() {
> +  class C {
> +    void f(int x) {
> +      switch (x) {
> +        case 0:
> +          x++;
> +          [[clang::fallthrough]]; // expected-no-diagnostics
> +        case 1:
> +          x++;
> +          break;
> +      }
> +    }
> +  };
> +}
> +
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
> Is there any reason why this can't go in one of the existing test files? We try not to increase the number of test files at a whim because each one has a nonzero startup time.
> 
> On Apr 2, 2013, at 8:20 , Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com> wrote:
> 
> > Author: alexfh
> > Date: Tue Apr  2 10:20:32 2013
> > New Revision: 178543
> >
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=178543&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Fixed "fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label" warning in
> > case when [[clang::fallthrough]]; is used in a method of a local class.
> >
> > Added:
> >    cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough-regression.cpp
> > Modified:
> >    cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp
> >
> > Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp?rev=178543&r1=178542&r2=178543&view=diff
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp (original)
> > +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp Tue Apr  2 10:20:32 2013
> > @@ -817,6 +817,10 @@ namespace {
> >       return true;
> >     }
> >
> > +    // We don't want to traverse local type declarations. We analyze their
> > +    // methods separately.
> > +    bool TraverseDecl(Decl *D) { return true; }
> > +
> >   private:
> >
> >     static const AttributedStmt *asFallThroughAttr(const Stmt *S) {
> >
> > Added: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough-regression.cpp
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough-regression.cpp?rev=178543&view=auto
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough-regression.cpp (added)
> > +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough-regression.cpp Tue Apr  2 10:20:32 2013
> > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 -Wimplicit-fallthrough %s
> > +
> > +void f() {
> > +  class C {
> > +    void f(int x) {
> > +      switch (x) {
> > +        case 0:
> > +          x++;
> > +          [[clang::fallthrough]]; // expected-no-diagnostics
> > +        case 1:
> > +          x++;
> > +          break;
> > +      }
> > +    }
> > +  };
> > +}
> > +
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-commits mailing list
> > cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alexander Kornienko | Software Engineer | alexfh at google.com | +49 151 221 77 957
> Google Germany GmbH | Dienerstr. 12 | 80331 München

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130402/55478695/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list