r178320 - Revert r178273 as it broke the Linux bootstrap due to false positives
Timur Iskhodzhanov
timurrrr at google.com
Thu Mar 28 17:22:03 PDT 2013
Author: timurrrr
Date: Thu Mar 28 19:22:03 2013
New Revision: 178320
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=178320&view=rev
Log:
Revert r178273 as it broke the Linux bootstrap due to false positives
Modified:
cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/Sema/constant-conversion.c
Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td?rev=178320&r1=178319&r2=178320&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td Thu Mar 28 19:22:03 2013
@@ -2084,11 +2084,6 @@ def warn_impcast_integer_64_32 : Warning
def warn_impcast_integer_precision_constant : Warning<
"implicit conversion from %2 to %3 changes value from %0 to %1">,
InGroup<ConstantConversion>;
-def warn_impcast_integer_precision_binop_constant : Warning<
- "implicit conversion of binary operation from %2 to %3 may change its value; "
- "value of operand would be changed from %0 to %1 if converted before "
- "operation">,
- InGroup<ConstantConversion>;
def warn_impcast_bitfield_precision_constant : Warning<
"implicit truncation from %2 to bitfield changes value from %0 to %1">,
InGroup<ConstantConversion>;
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp?rev=178320&r1=178319&r2=178320&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp Thu Mar 28 19:22:03 2013
@@ -4686,8 +4686,7 @@ static void AnalyzeAssignment(Sema &S, B
// We want to recurse on the RHS as normal unless we're assigning to
// a bitfield.
if (FieldDecl *Bitfield = E->getLHS()->getBitField()) {
- if (E->getOpcode() != BO_AndAssign &&
- AnalyzeBitFieldAssignment(S, Bitfield, E->getRHS(),
+ if (AnalyzeBitFieldAssignment(S, Bitfield, E->getRHS(),
E->getOperatorLoc())) {
// Recurse, ignoring any implicit conversions on the RHS.
return AnalyzeImplicitConversions(S, E->getRHS()->IgnoreParenImpCasts(),
@@ -4796,82 +4795,8 @@ void CheckImplicitArgumentConversions(Se
}
}
-// Try to evaluate E as an integer. If EvaluateAsInt succeeds, Value is set to
-// the resulting value, ResultExpr is set to E.
-// Otherwise, the output parameters are not modified.
-static bool EvalAsInt(ASTContext &Ctx, llvm::APSInt &Value, Expr *E,
- Expr **ResultExpr) {
- if (E->EvaluateAsInt(Value, Ctx, Expr::SE_AllowSideEffects)) {
- *ResultExpr = E;
- return true;
- }
- return false;
-}
-
-// Returns true when Value's value would change when narrowed to TargetRange.
-static bool TruncationChangesValue(const llvm::APSInt &Value,
- const IntRange &TargetRange,
- bool IsBitwiseAnd) {
- // Checks if there are any active non-sign bits past the width of TargetRange.
- if (IsBitwiseAnd)
- return Value.getBitWidth() - Value.getNumSignBits() > TargetRange.Width;
-
- llvm::APSInt UnsignedValue(Value);
- unsigned BitWidth = TargetRange.NonNegative ?
- UnsignedValue.getActiveBits() : Value.getMinSignedBits();
- return BitWidth > TargetRange.Width;
-}
-
-// Determine if E is an expression containing or likely to contain an implicit
-// narrowing bug involving a constant.
-// If so, Value is set to the value of that constant. NarrowedExpr is set to the
-// problematic sub-expression if it is a strict subset of E.
-static bool OperandMightImplicitlyNarrow(ASTContext &Ctx, llvm::APSInt &Value,
- Expr *E, IntRange TargetRange,
- Expr **NarrowedExpr) {
- BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(E);
- if (!BO)
- return false;
-
- switch (BO->getOpcode()) {
- case BO_And:
- case BO_AndAssign:
- return (EvalAsInt(Ctx, Value, BO->getLHS(), NarrowedExpr)
- && TruncationChangesValue(Value, TargetRange, true)) ||
- (EvalAsInt(Ctx, Value, BO->getRHS(), NarrowedExpr)
- && TruncationChangesValue(Value, TargetRange, true));
-
- case BO_Or:
- case BO_OrAssign:
- // FIXME: Include BO_Add, BO_Sub, and BO_Xor when we avoid false positives.
- case BO_AddAssign:
- case BO_SubAssign:
- case BO_Mul:
- case BO_MulAssign:
- case BO_XorAssign:
- return (EvalAsInt(Ctx, Value, BO->getLHS(), NarrowedExpr)
- && TruncationChangesValue(Value, TargetRange, false)) ||
- (EvalAsInt(Ctx, Value, BO->getRHS(), NarrowedExpr)
- && TruncationChangesValue(Value, TargetRange, false));
-
- // We can ignore the left side of the comma operator, since the value is
- // explicitly ignored anyway.
- case BO_Comma:
- return EvalAsInt(Ctx, Value, BO->getRHS(), NarrowedExpr) &&
- TruncationChangesValue(Value, TargetRange, false);
-
- case BO_Shl:
- return EvalAsInt(Ctx, Value, BO->getLHS(), NarrowedExpr) &&
- TruncationChangesValue(Value, TargetRange, false);
-
- default:
- break;
- }
- return false;
-}
-
void CheckImplicitConversion(Sema &S, Expr *E, QualType T,
- SourceLocation CC, bool *ICContext = NULL) {
+ SourceLocation CC, bool *ICContext = 0) {
if (E->isTypeDependent() || E->isValueDependent()) return;
const Type *Source = S.Context.getCanonicalType(E->getType()).getTypePtr();
@@ -5052,30 +4977,17 @@ void CheckImplicitConversion(Sema &S, Ex
IntRange SourceRange = GetExprRange(S.Context, E);
IntRange TargetRange = IntRange::forTargetOfCanonicalType(S.Context, Target);
- llvm::APSInt Value(32);
- Expr *NarrowedExpr = NULL;
- // Use a default-on diagnostic if the source is involved in a
- // narrowing-prone binary operation with a constant.
- if (OperandMightImplicitlyNarrow(S.Context, Value, E, TargetRange,
- &NarrowedExpr)) {
- std::string PrettySourceValue = Value.toString(10);
- std::string PrettyTargetValue = PrettyPrintInRange(Value, TargetRange);
-
- S.DiagRuntimeBehavior(E->getExprLoc(), NarrowedExpr,
- S.PDiag(diag::warn_impcast_integer_precision_binop_constant)
- << PrettySourceValue << PrettyTargetValue
- << E->getType() << T << NarrowedExpr->getSourceRange()
- << clang::SourceRange(CC));
- return;
- } else if (SourceRange.Width > TargetRange.Width) {
- // People want to build with -Wshorten-64-to-32 and not -Wconversion.
- if (S.SourceMgr.isInSystemMacro(CC))
- return;
-
+ if (SourceRange.Width > TargetRange.Width) {
// If the source is a constant, use a default-on diagnostic.
- if (E->EvaluateAsInt(Value, S.Context, Expr::SE_AllowSideEffects)) {
+ // TODO: this should happen for bitfield stores, too.
+ llvm::APSInt Value(32);
+ if (E->isIntegerConstantExpr(Value, S.Context)) {
+ if (S.SourceMgr.isInSystemMacro(CC))
+ return;
+
std::string PrettySourceValue = Value.toString(10);
std::string PrettyTargetValue = PrettyPrintInRange(Value, TargetRange);
+
S.DiagRuntimeBehavior(E->getExprLoc(), E,
S.PDiag(diag::warn_impcast_integer_precision_constant)
<< PrettySourceValue << PrettyTargetValue
@@ -5084,6 +4996,10 @@ void CheckImplicitConversion(Sema &S, Ex
return;
}
+ // People want to build with -Wshorten-64-to-32 and not -Wconversion.
+ if (S.SourceMgr.isInSystemMacro(CC))
+ return;
+
if (TargetRange.Width == 32 && S.Context.getIntWidth(E->getType()) == 64)
return DiagnoseImpCast(S, E, T, CC, diag::warn_impcast_integer_64_32,
/* pruneControlFlow */ true);
@@ -5213,25 +5129,6 @@ void AnalyzeImplicitConversions(Sema &S,
if (E->getType() != T)
CheckImplicitConversion(S, E, T, CC);
- // For CompoundAssignmentOperators, check the conversion from the computed
- // LHS type to the type of the assignee.
- if (CompoundAssignOperator *CAO = dyn_cast<CompoundAssignOperator>(E)) {
- QualType LHST = CAO->getComputationLHSType();
- // This CheckImplicitConversion would trigger a warning in addition to the
- // more serious problem of using NULLs in arithmetic.
- // Let the call to CheckImplicitConversion on the child expressions at the
- // bottom of this function handle them by filtering those out here.
- // Similarly, disable the extra check for shift assignments, since any
- // narrowing would be less serious than a too-large shift count.
- if (LHST != T &&
- T->isIntegralType(S.Context) && LHST->isIntegralType(S.Context) &&
- !CAO->isShiftAssignOp() &&
- CAO->getRHS()->isNullPointerConstant(S.Context,
- Expr::NPC_ValueDependentIsNotNull)
- != Expr::NPCK_GNUNull)
- CheckImplicitConversion(S, CAO->getRHS(), T, CC);
- }
-
// Now continue drilling into this expression.
// Skip past explicit casts.
@@ -5245,8 +5142,8 @@ void AnalyzeImplicitConversions(Sema &S,
if (BO->isComparisonOp())
return AnalyzeComparison(S, BO);
- // And with assignments.
- if (BO->isAssignmentOp())
+ // And with simple assignments.
+ if (BO->getOpcode() == BO_Assign)
return AnalyzeAssignment(S, BO);
}
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/constant-conversion.c
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/constant-conversion.c?rev=178320&r1=178319&r2=178320&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/constant-conversion.c (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/constant-conversion.c Thu Mar 28 19:22:03 2013
@@ -66,18 +66,13 @@ void test7() {
struct {
unsigned int twoBits1:2;
unsigned int twoBits2:2;
- unsigned int twoBits3:2;
- unsigned int reserved:26;
+ unsigned int reserved:28;
} f;
f.twoBits1 = ~1; // expected-warning {{implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from -2 to 2}}
f.twoBits2 = ~2; // expected-warning {{implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from -3 to 1}}
f.twoBits1 &= ~1; // no-warning
f.twoBits2 &= ~2; // no-warning
- f.twoBits3 |= 4; // expected-warning {{implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from 4 to 0}}
- f.twoBits3 += 4; // expected-warning {{implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from 4 to 0}}
- f.twoBits3 *= 4; // expected-warning {{implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from 4 to 0}}
- f.twoBits3 |= 1; // no-warning
}
void test8() {
@@ -85,38 +80,3 @@ void test8() {
struct { enum E x : 1; } f;
f.x = C; // expected-warning {{implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from 2 to 0}}
}
-
-int func(int);
-
-void test9() {
- unsigned char x = 0;
- unsigned char y = 0;
- x = y | 0x1ff; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion of binary operation from 'int' to 'unsigned char' may change its value; value of operand would be changed from 511 to 255 if converted before operation}}
- x = y | 0xff; // no-warning
- x = y & 0xdff; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion of binary operation from 'int' to 'unsigned char' may change its value; value of operand would be changed from 3583 to 255 if converted before operation}}
- x = y & 0xff; // no-warning
- x = y & ~1; // no-warning
- x = 0x1ff | y; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion of binary operation from 'int' to 'unsigned char' may change its value; value of operand would be changed from 511 to 255 if converted before operation}}
- x = 0xff | y; // no-warning
- x = (y | 0x1ff); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion of binary operation from 'int' to 'unsigned char' may change its value; value of operand would be changed from 511 to 255 if converted before operation}}
- x = (y | 0xff); // no-warning
- x = 0xff + y; // no-warning
- x += 0x1ff; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from 'int' to 'unsigned char' changes value from 511 to 255}}
- x = 0xff - y; // no-warning
- x -= 0x1ff; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from 'int' to 'unsigned char' changes value from 511 to 255}}
- x = y * 0x1ff; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion of binary operation from 'int' to 'unsigned char' may change its value; value of operand would be changed from 511 to 255 if converted before operation}}
- x = y * 0xff; // no-warning
- x *= 0x1ff; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from 'int' to 'unsigned char' changes value from 511 to 255}}
- x = y ^ 0xff; // no-warning
- x ^= 0x1ff; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion from 'int' to 'unsigned char' changes value from 511 to 255}}
- x = (func(1), 0x1ff); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion of binary operation from 'int' to 'unsigned char' may change its value; value of operand would be changed from 511 to 255 if converted before operation}}
- x = (func(1), 0xff); // no-warning
- x = 0xff << y; // no-warning
- x = 0x1ff << y; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion of binary operation from 'int' to 'unsigned char' may change its value; value of operand would be changed from 511 to 255 if converted before operation}}
-
-
- // These next two tests make sure that both LHS and RHS are checked for
- // narrowing operations.
- x = 0x1ff | 0xff; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion of binary operation from 'int' to 'unsigned char' may change its value; value of operand would be changed from 511 to 255 if converted before operation}}
- x = 0xff | 0x1ff; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion of binary operation from 'int' to 'unsigned char' may change its value; value of operand would be changed from 511 to 255 if converted before operation}}
-}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list