[PATCH] Fix DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl() for non-call references.

Richard Smith richard at metafoo.co.uk
Wed Mar 20 13:28:10 PDT 2013


  A test for this would be great (the found decl is included in the output of -ast-dump, so you could test that).


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:2363-2364
@@ -2362,4 +2362,4 @@
   if (!NeedsADL && R.isSingleResult() && !R.getAsSingle<FunctionTemplateDecl>())
-    return BuildDeclarationNameExpr(SS, R.getLookupNameInfo(),
-                                    R.getFoundDecl());
+    return BuildDeclarationNameExpr(SS, R.getLookupNameInfo(), R.getFoundDecl(),
+                                    R.getRepresentativeDecl());
 
----------------
These arguments appear to be reversed from the declaration of BuildDeclarationNameExpr. Is that intentional?


http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D550



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list