[PATCH] Adds a CMake package configuration file for libclang

[Damien Buhl]

On 03/14/2013 03:45 PM, Brad King wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 05:33 PM, Damien Buhl wrote:
>> @Brad King : What do you think about LIBCLANG_LIBRARY_VERSION as a
>> concatenation of :
>> CINDEX_VERSION_MAJOR.CINDEX_VERSION_MINOR.CLANG_VERSION_MAJOR.CLANG_VERSION_MINOR
>> ? Isn't it a problem that patch and tweak version of the lib are the
>> major, minor of clang ?
>
> This is a decision for Clang/libclang folks to make, not me.
>
You are right, and it's good that you point it out, so that they feel 
concerned, because in my mail I'm only adressing you on the question.

> The goal is to provide a version number that applications can use
> to ensure the libclang they find will meet their needs.  The
> number is for the interface of libclang, so CINDEX_VERSION_*
> makes sense there IIRC.
>
> I'm not familiar enough with the relative versioning of Clang to
> libclang to make a specific recommendation on CLANG_VERSION_*
> components.
Yes I'm also a bit unsure of what they prefer and want, but I especially 
asked you because perhaps you would have seen something strange in this 
behaviour.

Thank you for all the advices until now. And thanks for CMake. :)
--
Damien Buhl
alias daminetreg