r176515 - Remove outdated claim that GCC builds without a C++ compiler from compilers comparison.

Richard Smith richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
Tue Mar 5 13:49:52 PST 2013


Author: rsmith
Date: Tue Mar  5 15:49:52 2013
New Revision: 176515

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=176515&view=rev
Log:
Remove outdated claim that GCC builds without a C++ compiler from compilers comparison.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html

Modified: cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html?rev=176515&r1=176514&r2=176515&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html Tue Mar  5 15:49:52 2013
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@
         FORTRAN, etc.</li>
     <li>GCC supports more targets than LLVM.</li>
     <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>
-    <li>GCC does not require a C++ compiler to build it.</li>
     </ul>
     
     <p>Pro's of clang vs GCC:</p>





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list