[cfe-commits] Fix PR 11326: conflicting mabi between -mabi and -target options on ARM
Weiming Zhao
weimingz at codeaurora.org
Mon Mar 4 13:20:53 PST 2013
Ping?
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
-----Original Message-----
From: Weiming Zhao [mailto:weimingz at codeaurora.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:11 AM
To: 'Rafael Espíndola'
Cc: 'cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu'; 'Anton Korobeynikov'
Subject: RE: [cfe-commits] Fix PR 11326: conflicting mabi between -mabi and -target options on ARM
Ping?
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
-----Original Message-----
From: Weiming Zhao [mailto:weimingz at codeaurora.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 11:30 AM
To: 'Rafael Espíndola'
Cc: 'cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu'; 'Anton Korobeynikov'
Subject: RE: [cfe-commits] Fix PR 11326: conflicting mabi between -mabi and -target options on ARM
You're right. That line is unnecessary.
Originally, I planned to patch the triple. Then, I found that it was unnecessary because ARMABIInfo::computerInfo() will do that.
But I forgot the clean up the code.
Thanks for the reviewing.
Weiming
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
-----Original Message-----
From: Rafael Espíndola [mailto:rafael.espindola at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 8:09 PM
To: weimingz at codeaurora.org
Cc: cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; Anton Korobeynikov
Subject: Re: [cfe-commits] Fix PR 11326: conflicting mabi between -mabi and -target options on ARM
On 26 December 2012 17:53, Weiming Zhao <weimingz at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Thanks for the review.
> I'm attaching the patch which includes test case.
Thanks for adding a test for the warning. I think the patch still needs a codegen patch that checks that the value passed to -mabi is actually used.
On the implementation itself: Why do you need to patch the triple instead of just changing the code using it to give preference to Opts.ABI?
+ Opts.Triple = T.getTriple();
This just copies the triple back, no?
> Thanks,
> weiming
Cheers,
Rafael
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list