r175045 - Emit virtual/deleting destructors properly with -cxx-abi microsoft, PR15058

Timur Iskhodzhanov timurrrr at google.com
Wed Feb 13 03:55:39 PST 2013


I see the problem, will fix soon.

2013/2/13 Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>:
> Ah, I was never running Release, only Release+Asserts or Debug.
> Looking...
> Is this OK if Release actually generates a different .ll?
> Timur Iskhodzhanov,
> Google Russia
>
>
>
> 2013/2/13 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>:
>> It could be reproducible with -Asserts.
>>
>> 2013/2/13 Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>:
>>> Hi Takumi,
>>>
>>> This change seems to work differently on your bot:
>>> http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/builds/1033/steps/test_clang/logs/Clang%20%3A%3A%20CodeGenCXX___microsoft-abi-structors.cpp
>>>
>>> /home/bb/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/builds/stagen/Release/bin/clang
>>> -cc1 -internal-isystem
>>> /home/bb/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/builds/stagen/Release/bin/../lib/clang/3.3/include
>>> -emit-llvm /home/bb/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp
>>> -o - -cxx-abi microsoft -triple=i386-pc-win32 -fno-rtti >
>>> /home/bb/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/builds/stagen/tools/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/Output/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp.tmp
>>> 2>&1
>>> FileCheck /home/bb/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp
>>> < /home/bb/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/builds/stagen/tools/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/Output/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp.tmp
>>> FileCheck --check-prefix=DTORS
>>> /home/bb/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp
>>> < /home/bb/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/builds/stagen/tools/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/Output/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp.tmp
>>> --
>>> Exit Code: 1
>>> Command Output (stderr):
>>> --
>>> /home/bb/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp:36:11:
>>> error: expected string not found in input
>>> // DTORS: %0 = icmp eq i8 %should_call_delete{{.*}}, 0
>>>           ^
>>> <stdin>:108:114: note: scanning from here
>>> define linkonce_odr x86_thiscallcc void
>>> @"\01??_GB@@UAEPAXI at Z"(%struct.B* %this, i1 zeroext
>>> %should_call_delete) unnamed_addr nounwind align 2 {
>>>
>>>                                           ^
>>> <stdin>:112:2: note: possible intended match here
>>>  %3 = zext i1 %should_call_delete to i8
>>>  ^
>>> --
>>>
>>> Any idea what's up and how to fix?
>>> Some .ll context would help...
>>>
>>> I can't repro locally on Linux, Mac and Windows.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Timur Iskhodzhanov,
>>> Google Russia
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/2/13 Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>:
>>>> Author: timurrrr
>>>> Date: Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> New Revision: 175045
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=175045&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Emit virtual/deleting destructors properly with -cxx-abi microsoft, PR15058
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>     cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp
>>>>     cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp
>>>>     cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h
>>>>     cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
>>>>     cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprCXX.cpp
>>>>     cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
>>>>     cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h
>>>>     cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp
>>>>     cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp
>>>>     cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-single-inheritance.cpp
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp?rev=175045&r1=175044&r2=175045&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> @@ -28,12 +28,25 @@ using namespace clang;
>>>>
>>>>  namespace {
>>>>
>>>> +static const FunctionDecl *getStructor(const FunctionDecl *fn) {
>>>> +  if (const FunctionTemplateDecl *ftd = fn->getPrimaryTemplate())
>>>> +    return ftd->getTemplatedDecl();
>>>> +
>>>> +  return fn;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  /// MicrosoftCXXNameMangler - Manage the mangling of a single name for the
>>>>  /// Microsoft Visual C++ ABI.
>>>>  class MicrosoftCXXNameMangler {
>>>>    MangleContext &Context;
>>>>    raw_ostream &Out;
>>>>
>>>> +  /// The "structor" is the top-level declaration being mangled, if
>>>> +  /// that's not a template specialization; otherwise it's the pattern
>>>> +  /// for that specialization.
>>>> +  const NamedDecl *Structor;
>>>> +  unsigned StructorType;
>>>> +
>>>>    // FIXME: audit the performance of BackRefMap as it might do way too many
>>>>    // copying of strings.
>>>>    typedef std::map<std::string, unsigned> BackRefMap;
>>>> @@ -47,7 +60,15 @@ class MicrosoftCXXNameMangler {
>>>>
>>>>  public:
>>>>    MicrosoftCXXNameMangler(MangleContext &C, raw_ostream &Out_)
>>>> -  : Context(C), Out(Out_), UseNameBackReferences(true) { }
>>>> +    : Context(C), Out(Out_),
>>>> +      Structor(0), StructorType(-1),
>>>> +      UseNameBackReferences(true) { }
>>>> +
>>>> +  MicrosoftCXXNameMangler(MangleContext &C, raw_ostream &Out_,
>>>> +                          const CXXDestructorDecl *D, CXXDtorType Type)
>>>> +    : Context(C), Out(Out_),
>>>> +      Structor(getStructor(D)), StructorType(Type),
>>>> +      UseNameBackReferences(true) { }
>>>>
>>>>    raw_ostream &getStream() const { return Out; }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -68,6 +89,7 @@ private:
>>>>    void mangleSourceName(const IdentifierInfo *II);
>>>>    void manglePostfix(const DeclContext *DC, bool NoFunction=false);
>>>>    void mangleOperatorName(OverloadedOperatorKind OO, SourceLocation Loc);
>>>> +  void mangleCXXDtorType(CXXDtorType T);
>>>>    void mangleQualifiers(Qualifiers Quals, bool IsMember);
>>>>    void manglePointerQualifiers(Qualifiers Quals);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -485,7 +507,14 @@ MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleUnqualifi
>>>>        break;
>>>>
>>>>      case DeclarationName::CXXDestructorName:
>>>> -      Out << "?1";
>>>> +      if (ND == Structor)
>>>> +        // If the named decl is the C++ destructor we're mangling,
>>>> +        // use the type we were given.
>>>> +        mangleCXXDtorType(static_cast<CXXDtorType>(StructorType));
>>>> +      else
>>>> +        // Otherwise, use the complete destructor name. This is relevant if a
>>>> +        // class with a destructor is declared within a destructor.
>>>> +        mangleCXXDtorType(Dtor_Complete);
>>>>        break;
>>>>
>>>>      case DeclarationName::CXXConversionFunctionName:
>>>> @@ -543,6 +572,23 @@ void MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::manglePost
>>>>    }
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> +void MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleCXXDtorType(CXXDtorType T) {
>>>> +  switch (T) {
>>>> +  case Dtor_Deleting:
>>>> +    Out << "?_G";
>>>> +    return;
>>>> +  case Dtor_Base:
>>>> +    // FIXME: We should be asked to mangle base dtors.
>>>> +    // However, fixing this would require larger changes to the CodeGenModule.
>>>> +    // Please put llvm_unreachable here when CGM is changed.
>>>> +    // For now, just mangle a base dtor the same way as a complete dtor...
>>>> +  case Dtor_Complete:
>>>> +    Out << "?1";
>>>> +    return;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +  llvm_unreachable("Unsupported dtor type?");
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  void MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleOperatorName(OverloadedOperatorKind OO,
>>>>                                                   SourceLocation Loc) {
>>>>    switch (OO) {
>>>> @@ -1110,9 +1156,18 @@ void MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleType
>>>>
>>>>    // <return-type> ::= <type>
>>>>    //               ::= @ # structors (they have no declared return type)
>>>> -  if (IsStructor)
>>>> +  if (IsStructor) {
>>>> +    if (isa<CXXDestructorDecl>(D) && D == Structor &&
>>>> +        StructorType == Dtor_Deleting) {
>>>> +      // The scalar deleting destructor takes an extra int argument.
>>>> +      // However, the FunctionType generated has 0 arguments.
>>>> +      // FIXME: This is a temporary hack.
>>>> +      // Maybe should fix the FunctionType creation instead?
>>>> +      Out << "PAXI at Z";
>>>> +      return;
>>>> +    }
>>>>      Out << '@';
>>>> -  else {
>>>> +  } else {
>>>>      QualType Result = Proto->getResultType();
>>>>      const Type* RT = Result.getTypePtr();
>>>>      if (!RT->isAnyPointerType() && !RT->isReferenceType()) {
>>>> @@ -1711,7 +1766,7 @@ void MicrosoftMangleContext::mangleCXXCt
>>>>  void MicrosoftMangleContext::mangleCXXDtor(const CXXDestructorDecl *D,
>>>>                                             CXXDtorType Type,
>>>>                                             raw_ostream & Out) {
>>>> -  MicrosoftCXXNameMangler mangler(*this, Out);
>>>> +  MicrosoftCXXNameMangler mangler(*this, Out, D, Type);
>>>>    mangler.mangle(D);
>>>>  }
>>>>  void MicrosoftMangleContext::mangleReferenceTemporary(const clang::VarDecl *VD,
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp?rev=175045&r1=175044&r2=175045&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> @@ -1160,6 +1160,8 @@ void VTableBuilder::ComputeThisAdjustmen
>>>>        break;
>>>>      case VTableComponent::CK_DeletingDtorPointer:
>>>>        // We've already added the thunk when we saw the complete dtor pointer.
>>>> +      // FIXME: check how this works in the Microsoft ABI
>>>> +      // while working on the multiple inheritance patch.
>>>>        continue;
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1302,11 +1304,8 @@ VTableBuilder::AddMethod(const CXXMethod
>>>>        Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeCompleteDtor(DD));
>>>>        Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeDeletingDtor(DD));
>>>>      } else {
>>>> -      // Add only one destructor in MS mode.
>>>> -      // FIXME: The virtual destructors are handled differently in MS ABI,
>>>> -      // we should add such a support later. For now, put the complete
>>>> -      // destructor into the vftable just to make its layout right.
>>>> -      Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeCompleteDtor(DD));
>>>> +      // Add the scalar deleting destructor.
>>>> +      Components.push_back(VTableComponent::MakeDeletingDtor(DD));
>>>>      }
>>>>    } else {
>>>>      // Add the return adjustment if necessary.
>>>> @@ -1951,6 +1950,8 @@ void VTableBuilder::dumpLayout(raw_ostre
>>>>        Out << DD->getQualifiedNameAsString();
>>>>        if (IsComplete)
>>>>          Out << "() [complete]";
>>>> +      else if (isMicrosoftABI())
>>>> +        Out << "() [scalar deleting]";
>>>>        else
>>>>          Out << "() [deleting]";
>>>>
>>>> @@ -2142,8 +2143,8 @@ void VTableBuilder::dumpLayout(raw_ostre
>>>>          IndicesMap[VTables.getMethodVTableIndex(GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Deleting))]
>>>>            = MethodName + " [deleting]";
>>>>        } else {
>>>> -        IndicesMap[VTables.getMethodVTableIndex(GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Complete))]
>>>> -          = MethodName;
>>>> +        IndicesMap[VTables.getMethodVTableIndex(GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Deleting))]
>>>> +          = MethodName + " [scalar deleting]";
>>>>        }
>>>>      } else {
>>>>        IndicesMap[VTables.getMethodVTableIndex(MD)] = MethodName;
>>>> @@ -2275,8 +2276,9 @@ void VTableContext::ComputeMethodVTableI
>>>>              MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Deleting)] =
>>>>                getMethodVTableIndex(GlobalDecl(OverriddenDD, Dtor_Deleting));
>>>>            } else {
>>>> -            MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Complete)] =
>>>> -              getMethodVTableIndex(GlobalDecl(OverriddenDD, Dtor_Complete));
>>>> +            // Add the scalar deleting destructor.
>>>> +            MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Deleting)] =
>>>> +              getMethodVTableIndex(GlobalDecl(OverriddenDD, Dtor_Deleting));
>>>>            }
>>>>          } else {
>>>>            MethodVTableIndices[MD] = getMethodVTableIndex(OverriddenMD);
>>>> @@ -2302,11 +2304,8 @@ void VTableContext::ComputeMethodVTableI
>>>>          // Add the deleting dtor.
>>>>          MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Deleting)] = CurrentIndex++;
>>>>        } else {
>>>> -        // Add only the deleting dtor.
>>>> -        // FIXME: The virtual destructors are handled differently in MS ABI,
>>>> -        // we should add such a support later. For now, put the complete
>>>> -        // destructor into the vftable indices.
>>>> -        MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Complete)] = CurrentIndex++;
>>>> +        // Add the scalar deleting dtor.
>>>> +        MethodVTableIndices[GlobalDecl(DD, Dtor_Deleting)] = CurrentIndex++;
>>>>        }
>>>>      } else {
>>>>        // Add the entry.
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h?rev=175045&r1=175044&r2=175045&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> @@ -54,11 +54,20 @@ protected:
>>>>      return CGF.CXXABIThisValue;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +  // FIXME: Every place that calls getVTT{Decl,Value} is something
>>>> +  // that needs to be abstracted properly.
>>>>    ImplicitParamDecl *&getVTTDecl(CodeGenFunction &CGF) {
>>>> -    return CGF.CXXVTTDecl;
>>>> +    return CGF.CXXStructorImplicitParamDecl;
>>>>    }
>>>>    llvm::Value *&getVTTValue(CodeGenFunction &CGF) {
>>>> -    return CGF.CXXVTTValue;
>>>> +    return CGF.CXXStructorImplicitParamValue;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +
>>>> +  ImplicitParamDecl *&getStructorImplicitParamDecl(CodeGenFunction &CGF) {
>>>> +    return CGF.CXXStructorImplicitParamDecl;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +  llvm::Value *&getStructorImplicitParamValue(CodeGenFunction &CGF) {
>>>> +    return CGF.CXXStructorImplicitParamValue;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>>    /// Build a parameter variable suitable for 'this'.
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp?rev=175045&r1=175044&r2=175045&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> @@ -953,6 +953,32 @@ namespace {
>>>>      }
>>>>    };
>>>>
>>>> +  struct CallDtorDeleteConditional : EHScopeStack::Cleanup {
>>>> +    llvm::Value *ShouldDeleteCondition;
>>>> +  public:
>>>> +    CallDtorDeleteConditional(llvm::Value *ShouldDeleteCondition)
>>>> +      : ShouldDeleteCondition(ShouldDeleteCondition) {
>>>> +      assert(ShouldDeleteCondition != NULL);
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    void Emit(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Flags flags) {
>>>> +      llvm::BasicBlock *callDeleteBB = CGF.createBasicBlock("dtor.call_delete");
>>>> +      llvm::BasicBlock *continueBB = CGF.createBasicBlock("dtor.continue");
>>>> +      llvm::Value *ShouldCallDelete
>>>> +        = CGF.Builder.CreateIsNull(ShouldDeleteCondition);
>>>> +      CGF.Builder.CreateCondBr(ShouldCallDelete, continueBB, callDeleteBB);
>>>> +
>>>> +      CGF.EmitBlock(callDeleteBB);
>>>> +      const CXXDestructorDecl *Dtor = cast<CXXDestructorDecl>(CGF.CurCodeDecl);
>>>> +      const CXXRecordDecl *ClassDecl = Dtor->getParent();
>>>> +      CGF.EmitDeleteCall(Dtor->getOperatorDelete(), CGF.LoadCXXThis(),
>>>> +                         CGF.getContext().getTagDeclType(ClassDecl));
>>>> +      CGF.Builder.CreateBr(continueBB);
>>>> +
>>>> +      CGF.EmitBlock(continueBB);
>>>> +    }
>>>> +  };
>>>> +
>>>>    class DestroyField  : public EHScopeStack::Cleanup {
>>>>      const FieldDecl *field;
>>>>      CodeGenFunction::Destroyer *destroyer;
>>>> @@ -991,7 +1017,14 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EnterDtorCleanups(
>>>>    if (DtorType == Dtor_Deleting) {
>>>>      assert(DD->getOperatorDelete() &&
>>>>             "operator delete missing - EmitDtorEpilogue");
>>>> -    EHStack.pushCleanup<CallDtorDelete>(NormalAndEHCleanup);
>>>> +    if (CXXStructorImplicitParamValue) {
>>>> +      // If there is an implicit param to the deleting dtor, it's a boolean
>>>> +      // telling whether we should call delete at the end of the dtor.
>>>> +      EHStack.pushCleanup<CallDtorDeleteConditional>(
>>>> +          NormalAndEHCleanup, CXXStructorImplicitParamValue);
>>>> +    } else {
>>>> +      EHStack.pushCleanup<CallDtorDelete>(NormalAndEHCleanup);
>>>> +    }
>>>>      return;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1243,7 +1276,8 @@ CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXConstructorCall(
>>>>
>>>>    // FIXME: Provide a source location here.
>>>>    EmitCXXMemberCall(D, SourceLocation(), Callee, ReturnValueSlot(), This,
>>>> -                    VTT, ArgBeg, ArgEnd);
>>>> +                    VTT, getContext().getPointerType(getContext().VoidPtrTy),
>>>> +                    ArgBeg, ArgEnd);
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  void
>>>> @@ -1399,7 +1433,8 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXDestructorC
>>>>
>>>>    // FIXME: Provide a source location here.
>>>>    EmitCXXMemberCall(DD, SourceLocation(), Callee, ReturnValueSlot(), This,
>>>> -                    VTT, 0, 0);
>>>> +                    VTT, getContext().getPointerType(getContext().VoidPtrTy),
>>>> +                    0, 0);
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  namespace {
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprCXX.cpp
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprCXX.cpp?rev=175045&r1=175044&r2=175045&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprCXX.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExprCXX.cpp Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> @@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXMemberCal
>>>>                                            llvm::Value *Callee,
>>>>                                            ReturnValueSlot ReturnValue,
>>>>                                            llvm::Value *This,
>>>> -                                          llvm::Value *VTT,
>>>> +                                          llvm::Value *ImplicitParam,
>>>> +                                          QualType ImplicitParamTy,
>>>>                                            CallExpr::const_arg_iterator ArgBeg,
>>>>                                            CallExpr::const_arg_iterator ArgEnd) {
>>>>    assert(MD->isInstance() &&
>>>> @@ -46,10 +47,9 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXMemberCal
>>>>    // Push the this ptr.
>>>>    Args.add(RValue::get(This), MD->getThisType(getContext()));
>>>>
>>>> -  // If there is a VTT parameter, emit it.
>>>> -  if (VTT) {
>>>> -    QualType T = getContext().getPointerType(getContext().VoidPtrTy);
>>>> -    Args.add(RValue::get(VTT), T);
>>>> +  // If there is an implicit parameter (e.g. VTT), emit it.
>>>> +  if (ImplicitParam) {
>>>> +    Args.add(RValue::get(ImplicitParam), ImplicitParamTy);
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>>    const FunctionProtoType *FPT = MD->getType()->castAs<FunctionProtoType>();
>>>> @@ -316,7 +316,8 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXMemberCal
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>>    return EmitCXXMemberCall(MD, CE->getExprLoc(), Callee, ReturnValue, This,
>>>> -                           /*VTT=*/0, CE->arg_begin(), CE->arg_end());
>>>> +                           /*ImplicitParam=*/0, QualType(),
>>>> +                           CE->arg_begin(), CE->arg_end());
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  RValue
>>>> @@ -388,7 +389,8 @@ CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXOperatorMemberCa
>>>>
>>>>    llvm::Value *Callee = EmitCXXOperatorMemberCallee(E, MD, This);
>>>>    return EmitCXXMemberCall(MD, E->getExprLoc(), Callee, ReturnValue, This,
>>>> -                           /*VTT=*/0, E->arg_begin() + 1, E->arg_end());
>>>> +                           /*ImplicitParam=*/0, QualType(),
>>>> +                           E->arg_begin() + 1, E->arg_end());
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitCUDAKernelCallExpr(const CUDAKernelCallExpr *E,
>>>> @@ -1408,7 +1410,7 @@ static void EmitObjectDelete(CodeGenFunc
>>>>                                   Ptr, Ty);
>>>>          // FIXME: Provide a source location here.
>>>>          CGF.EmitCXXMemberCall(Dtor, SourceLocation(), Callee, ReturnValueSlot(),
>>>> -                              Ptr, /*VTT=*/0, 0, 0);
>>>> +                              Ptr, /*ImplicitParam=*/0, QualType(), 0, 0);
>>>>
>>>>          if (UseGlobalDelete) {
>>>>            CGF.PopCleanupBlock();
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp?rev=175045&r1=175044&r2=175045&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> @@ -43,8 +43,9 @@ CodeGenFunction::CodeGenFunction(CodeGen
>>>>      FirstBlockInfo(0), EHResumeBlock(0), ExceptionSlot(0), EHSelectorSlot(0),
>>>>      DebugInfo(0), DisableDebugInfo(false), DidCallStackSave(false),
>>>>      IndirectBranch(0), SwitchInsn(0), CaseRangeBlock(0), UnreachableBlock(0),
>>>> -    CXXABIThisDecl(0), CXXABIThisValue(0), CXXThisValue(0), CXXVTTDecl(0),
>>>> -    CXXVTTValue(0), OutermostConditional(0), TerminateLandingPad(0),
>>>> +    CXXABIThisDecl(0), CXXABIThisValue(0), CXXThisValue(0),
>>>> +    CXXStructorImplicitParamDecl(0), CXXStructorImplicitParamValue(0),
>>>> +    OutermostConditional(0), TerminateLandingPad(0),
>>>>      TerminateHandler(0), TrapBB(0) {
>>>>    if (!suppressNewContext)
>>>>      CGM.getCXXABI().getMangleContext().startNewFunction();
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h?rev=175045&r1=175044&r2=175045&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> @@ -1179,11 +1179,10 @@ private:
>>>>    llvm::Value *CXXABIThisValue;
>>>>    llvm::Value *CXXThisValue;
>>>>
>>>> -  /// CXXVTTDecl - When generating code for a base object constructor or
>>>> -  /// base object destructor with virtual bases, this will hold the implicit
>>>> -  /// VTT parameter.
>>>> -  ImplicitParamDecl *CXXVTTDecl;
>>>> -  llvm::Value *CXXVTTValue;
>>>> +  /// CXXStructorImplicitParamDecl - When generating code for a constructor or
>>>> +  /// destructor, this will hold the implicit argument (e.g. VTT).
>>>> +  ImplicitParamDecl *CXXStructorImplicitParamDecl;
>>>> +  llvm::Value *CXXStructorImplicitParamValue;
>>>>
>>>>    /// OutermostConditional - Points to the outermost active
>>>>    /// conditional control.  This is used so that we know if a
>>>> @@ -1777,9 +1776,19 @@ public:
>>>>
>>>>    /// LoadCXXVTT - Load the VTT parameter to base constructors/destructors have
>>>>    /// virtual bases.
>>>> +  // FIXME: Every place that calls LoadCXXVTT is something
>>>> +  // that needs to be abstracted properly.
>>>>    llvm::Value *LoadCXXVTT() {
>>>> -    assert(CXXVTTValue && "no VTT value for this function");
>>>> -    return CXXVTTValue;
>>>> +    assert(CXXStructorImplicitParamValue && "no VTT value for this function");
>>>> +    return CXXStructorImplicitParamValue;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +
>>>> +  /// LoadCXXStructorImplicitParam - Load the implicit parameter
>>>> +  /// for a constructor/destructor.
>>>> +  llvm::Value *LoadCXXStructorImplicitParam() {
>>>> +    assert(CXXStructorImplicitParamValue &&
>>>> +           "no implicit argument value for this function");
>>>> +    return CXXStructorImplicitParamValue;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>>    /// GetAddressOfBaseOfCompleteClass - Convert the given pointer to a
>>>> @@ -2294,7 +2303,8 @@ public:
>>>>                             llvm::Value *Callee,
>>>>                             ReturnValueSlot ReturnValue,
>>>>                             llvm::Value *This,
>>>> -                           llvm::Value *VTT,
>>>> +                           llvm::Value *ImplicitParam,
>>>> +                           QualType ImplicitParamTy,
>>>>                             CallExpr::const_arg_iterator ArgBeg,
>>>>                             CallExpr::const_arg_iterator ArgEnd);
>>>>    RValue EmitCXXMemberCallExpr(const CXXMemberCallExpr *E,
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp?rev=175045&r1=175044&r2=175045&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> @@ -45,10 +45,7 @@ public:
>>>>    void BuildDestructorSignature(const CXXDestructorDecl *Ctor,
>>>>                                  CXXDtorType Type,
>>>>                                  CanQualType &ResTy,
>>>> -                                SmallVectorImpl<CanQualType> &ArgTys) {
>>>> -    // 'this' is already in place
>>>> -    // TODO: 'for base' flag
>>>> -  }
>>>> +                                SmallVectorImpl<CanQualType> &ArgTys);
>>>>
>>>>    void BuildInstanceFunctionParams(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
>>>>                                     QualType &ResTy,
>>>> @@ -121,6 +118,27 @@ void MicrosoftCXXABI::BuildConstructorSi
>>>>    ResTy = ArgTys[0];
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> +void MicrosoftCXXABI::BuildDestructorSignature(const CXXDestructorDecl *Dtor,
>>>> +                                               CXXDtorType Type,
>>>> +                                               CanQualType &ResTy,
>>>> +                                        SmallVectorImpl<CanQualType> &ArgTys) {
>>>> +  // 'this' is already in place
>>>> +  // TODO: 'for base' flag
>>>> +
>>>> +  if (Type == Dtor_Deleting) {
>>>> +    // The scalar deleting destructor takes an implicit bool parameter.
>>>> +    ArgTys.push_back(CGM.getContext().BoolTy);
>>>> +  }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static bool IsDeletingDtor(GlobalDecl GD) {
>>>> +  const CXXMethodDecl* MD = cast<CXXMethodDecl>(GD.getDecl());
>>>> +  if (isa<CXXDestructorDecl>(MD)) {
>>>> +    return GD.getDtorType() == Dtor_Deleting;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +  return false;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  void MicrosoftCXXABI::BuildInstanceFunctionParams(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
>>>>                                                    QualType &ResTy,
>>>>                                                    FunctionArgList &Params) {
>>>> @@ -128,6 +146,17 @@ void MicrosoftCXXABI::BuildInstanceFunct
>>>>    if (needThisReturn(CGF.CurGD)) {
>>>>      ResTy = Params[0]->getType();
>>>>    }
>>>> +  if (IsDeletingDtor(CGF.CurGD)) {
>>>> +    ASTContext &Context = getContext();
>>>> +
>>>> +    ImplicitParamDecl *ShouldDelete
>>>> +      = ImplicitParamDecl::Create(Context, 0,
>>>> +                                  CGF.CurGD.getDecl()->getLocation(),
>>>> +                                  &Context.Idents.get("should_call_delete"),
>>>> +                                  Context.BoolTy);
>>>> +    Params.push_back(ShouldDelete);
>>>> +    getStructorImplicitParamDecl(CGF) = ShouldDelete;
>>>> +  }
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  void MicrosoftCXXABI::EmitInstanceFunctionProlog(CodeGenFunction &CGF) {
>>>> @@ -135,6 +164,14 @@ void MicrosoftCXXABI::EmitInstanceFuncti
>>>>    if (needThisReturn(CGF.CurGD)) {
>>>>      CGF.Builder.CreateStore(getThisValue(CGF), CGF.ReturnValue);
>>>>    }
>>>> +  if (IsDeletingDtor(CGF.CurGD)) {
>>>> +    assert(getStructorImplicitParamDecl(CGF) &&
>>>> +           "no implicit parameter for a deleting destructor?");
>>>> +    getStructorImplicitParamValue(CGF)
>>>> +      = CGF.Builder.CreateLoad(
>>>> +          CGF.GetAddrOfLocalVar(getStructorImplicitParamDecl(CGF)),
>>>> +          "should_call_delete");
>>>> +  }
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  bool MicrosoftCXXABI::requiresArrayCookie(const CXXDeleteExpr *expr,
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp?rev=175045&r1=175044&r2=175045&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-structors.cpp Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> @@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
>>>> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o - -cxx-abi microsoft -triple=i386-pc-win32 | FileCheck %s
>>>> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o - -cxx-abi microsoft -triple=i386-pc-win32 -fno-rtti > %t 2>&1
>>>> +// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t
>>>> +// Using a different check prefix as the inline destructors might be placed
>>>> +// anywhere in the output.
>>>> +// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=DTORS %s < %t
>>>>
>>>>  class A {
>>>>   public:
>>>> @@ -23,13 +27,60 @@ void no_constructor_destructor_infinite_
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  struct B {
>>>> -  virtual ~B();
>>>> +  virtual ~B() {
>>>> +// Complete destructor first:
>>>> +// DTORS: define {{.*}} x86_thiscallcc void @"\01??1B@@UAE at XZ"(%struct.B* %this)
>>>> +//
>>>> +// Then, the scalar deleting destructor (used in the vtable):
>>>> +// DTORS:      define {{.*}} x86_thiscallcc void @"\01??_GB@@UAEPAXI at Z"(%struct.B* %this, i1 zeroext %should_call_delete)
>>>> +// DTORS:        %0 = icmp eq i8 %should_call_delete{{.*}}, 0
>>>> +// DTORS-NEXT:   br i1 %0, label %dtor.continue, label %dtor.call_delete
>>>> +// DTORS:      dtor.call_delete:
>>>> +// DTORS-NEXT:   %1 = bitcast %struct.B* %this1 to i8*
>>>> +// DTORS-NEXT:   call void @"\01??3 at YAXPAX@Z"(i8* %1) nounwind
>>>> +// DTORS-NEXT:   br label %dtor.continue
>>>> +// DTORS:      dtor.continue:
>>>> +// DTORS-NEXT:   ret void
>>>> +  }
>>>>    virtual void foo();
>>>>  };
>>>>
>>>> +// Emits the vftable in the output.
>>>> +void B::foo() {}
>>>> +
>>>>  void check_vftable_offset() {
>>>>    B b;
>>>>  // The vftable pointer should point at the beginning of the vftable.
>>>>  // CHECK: [[THIS_PTR:%[0-9]+]] = bitcast %struct.B* {{.*}} to i8***
>>>>  // CHECK: store i8** getelementptr inbounds ([2 x i8*]* @"\01??_7B@@6B@", i64 0, i64 0), i8*** [[THIS_PTR]]
>>>>  }
>>>> +
>>>> +// FIXME: Enable the following block and add expectations when calls
>>>> +// to virtual complete dtor are supported.
>>>> +#if 0
>>>> +void call_complete_dtor(B *obj_ptr) {
>>>> +  obj_ptr->~B();
>>>> +}
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> +void call_deleting_dtor(B *obj_ptr) {
>>>> +// FIXME: Add CHECKs when calls to virtual deleting dtor are generated properly.
>>>> +  delete obj_ptr;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +struct C {
>>>> +  static int foo();
>>>> +
>>>> +  C() {
>>>> +    static int ctor_static = foo();
>>>> +    // CHECK that the static in the ctor gets mangled correctly:
>>>> +    // CHECK: @"\01?ctor_static@?1???0C@@QAE at XZ@4HA"
>>>> +  }
>>>> +  ~C() {
>>>> +    static int dtor_static = foo();
>>>> +    // CHECK that the static in the dtor gets mangled correctly:
>>>> +    // CHECK: @"\01?dtor_static@?1???1C@@QAE at XZ@4HA"
>>>> +  }
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +void use_C() { C c; }
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-single-inheritance.cpp
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-single-inheritance.cpp?rev=175045&r1=175044&r2=175045&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-single-inheritance.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-single-inheritance.cpp Wed Feb 13 02:37:51 2013
>>>> @@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ void B::f() {}
>>>>
>>>>  struct C {
>>>>    // CHECK-C: Vtable for 'C' (2 entries)
>>>> -  // CHECK-C-NEXT: 0 | C::~C()
>>>> +  // CHECK-C-NEXT: 0 | C::~C() [scalar deleting]
>>>>    // CHECK-C-NEXT: 1 | void C::f()
>>>>    // CHECK-C: VTable indices for 'C' (2 entries).
>>>> -  // CHECK-C-NEXT: 0 | C::~C()
>>>> +  // CHECK-C-NEXT: 0 | C::~C() [scalar deleting]
>>>>    // CHECK-C-NEXT: 1 | void C::f()
>>>>    // Never used, so doesn't emit a vtable.
>>>>    virtual ~C();
>>>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void C::f() {}
>>>>  struct D {
>>>>    // CHECK-D: Vtable for 'D' (2 entries)
>>>>    // CHECK-D-NEXT: 0 | void D::f()
>>>> -  // CHECK-D-NEXT: 1 | D::~D()
>>>> +  // CHECK-D-NEXT: 1 | D::~D() [scalar deleting]
>>>>    // EMITS-VTABLE: @"\01??_7D@@6B@" = unnamed_addr constant [2 x i8*]
>>>>    virtual void f();
>>>>
>>>> @@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ struct E : A {
>>>>    // CHECK-E-NEXT: 0 | void A::f()
>>>>    // CHECK-E-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>>>    // CHECK-E-NEXT: 2 | void A::h()
>>>> -  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 3 | E::~E()
>>>> +  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 3 | E::~E() [scalar deleting]
>>>>    // CHECK-E-NEXT: 4 | void E::i()
>>>>    // CHECK-E: VTable indices for 'E' (2 entries).
>>>> -  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 3 | E::~E()
>>>> +  // CHECK-E-NEXT: 3 | E::~E() [scalar deleting]
>>>>    // CHECK-E-NEXT: 4 | void E::i()
>>>>
>>>>    // Never used, so doesn't emit a vtable.
>>>> @@ -83,10 +83,10 @@ struct F : A {
>>>>    // CHECK-F-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>>>    // CHECK-F-NEXT: 2 | void A::h()
>>>>    // CHECK-F-NEXT: 3 | void F::i()
>>>> -  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 4 | F::~F()
>>>> +  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 4 | F::~F() [scalar deleting]
>>>>    // CHECK-F: VTable indices for 'F' (2 entries).
>>>>    // CHECK-F-NEXT: 3 | void F::i()
>>>> -  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 4 | F::~F()
>>>> +  // CHECK-F-NEXT: 4 | F::~F() [scalar deleting]
>>>>    // EMITS-VTABLE: @"\01??_7F@@6B@" = unnamed_addr constant [5 x i8*]
>>>>    virtual void i();
>>>>    virtual ~F();
>>>> @@ -98,12 +98,12 @@ struct G : E {
>>>>    // CHECK-G-NEXT: 0 | void G::f()
>>>>    // CHECK-G-NEXT: 1 | void A::g()
>>>>    // CHECK-G-NEXT: 2 | void A::h()
>>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 3 | G::~G()
>>>> +  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 3 | G::~G() [scalar deleting]
>>>>    // CHECK-G-NEXT: 4 | void E::i()
>>>>    // CHECK-G-NEXT: 5 | void G::j()
>>>>    // CHECK-G: VTable indices for 'G' (3 entries).
>>>>    // CHECK-G-NEXT: 0 | void G::f()
>>>> -  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 3 | G::~G()
>>>> +  // CHECK-G-NEXT: 3 | G::~G() [scalar deleting]
>>>>    // CHECK-G-NEXT: 5 | void G::j()
>>>>    // Never used, so doesn't emit a vtable.
>>>>    virtual void f();  // overrides A::f()
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list