[PATCH] Fixing warnings revealed by gcc release build

[Dmitri Gribenko]

================
Comment at: lib/Basic/LangOptions.cpp:17-21
@@ -16,3 +16,7 @@
 
-const SanitizerOptions SanitizerOptions::Disabled = {};
+const SanitizerOptions SanitizerOptions::Disabled = {
+#define SANITIZER(NAME, ID) 0,
+#include "clang/Basic/Sanitizers.def"
+};
+
 
----------------
David Blaikie wrote:
> Not sure of the motivation for this change - shouldn't the {} in the original code produce the same effect (zero initializing all the elements)?
I have mixed feelings about this.  -Wmissing-field-initializers is a different thing: all members are initialized by {}, but gcc complains that initializers are not explicitly spelled in the source.

================
Comment at: lib/AST/Decl.cpp:668
@@ -667,2 +667,3 @@
   }
+  (void)D;
   assert(!D || D->CachedLinkage == CachedLinkage);
----------------
This one LGTM.


http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D342