[PATCH] [msan] Run more optimization after MemorySanitizer pass
Evgeniy Stepanov
eugenis at google.com
Tue Jan 29 02:41:43 PST 2013
I've reduced the CL to 6 optimization passes that really make a difference.
Hi kcc, chandlerc,
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D189
CHANGE SINCE LAST DIFF
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D189?vs=460&id=800#toc
Files:
lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
Index: lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
+++ lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
@@ -184,6 +184,17 @@
const CodeGenOptions &CGOpts = BuilderWrapper.getCGOpts();
PM.add(createMemorySanitizerPass(CGOpts.SanitizeMemoryTrackOrigins,
CGOpts.SanitizerBlacklistFile));
+
+ // Re-run some generic optimizations to simplify code generated by
+ // MemorySanitizer.
+ if (Builder.OptLevel > 0) {
+ PM.add(createEarlyCSEPass());
+ PM.add(createReassociatePass());
+ PM.add(createLICMPass());
+ PM.add(createGVNPass());
+ PM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
+ PM.add(createDeadStoreEliminationPass());
+ }
}
static void addThreadSanitizerPass(const PassManagerBuilder &Builder,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D189.2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 825 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130129/d5c18774/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list