[cfe-commits] r173361 - in /cfe/trunk: include/clang/Driver/Compilation.h include/clang/Driver/Util.h lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp lib/Driver/Driver.cpp lib/Driver/Tools.cpp lib/Driver/Tools.h test/Driver/output-file-cleanup.c

[NAKAMURA Takumi]

> No, it should be marked as "REQUIRES: x86-64-registered-target".

- It would fail also on x86_64-mingw32. "REQUIRES:x86_64" would not
make sense then.
- I believe it is temporary marking.

I know XFAIL might not suitable in clang tests, though.
For example XFAIL:arm matches both --host=arm and --target=arm.

If anyone found any failure (or xpass), then please disable whole test.

...Takumi


2013/1/25 Joey Gouly <Joey.Gouly at arm.com>:
> No, it should be marked as "REQUIRES: x86-64-registered-target".
>
> Joey
> ________________________________________
> From: cfe-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [cfe-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Renato Golin [renato.golin at linaro.org]
> Sent: 25 January 2013 08:36
> To: NAKAMURA Takumi
> Cc: cfe-commits
> Subject: Re: [cfe-commits] r173361 - in /cfe/trunk: include/clang/Driver/Compilation.h include/clang/Driver/Util.h lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp lib/Driver/Driver.cpp lib/Driver/Tools.cpp lib/Driver/Tools.h test/Driver/output-file-cleanup.c
>
> On 25 January 2013 06:58, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com<mailto:geek4civic at gmail.com>> wrote:
> For now, I have XFAIL'ed for mingw and ppc, in r173428.
>
> It's also failing on ARM. Is it the same situation when a back-end is not compiled and you get a NULL pointer on the target specific parser? If so, we should mark it as XFAIL all over.
>
> --renato
>
>
>
> -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium.  Thank you.
>