[cfe-commits] patch: implement nonnull on overloaded binary operators
Matt Beaumont-Gay
matthewbg at google.com
Wed Jan 23 17:59:53 PST 2013
LGTM
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote:
> On 23 January 2013 17:52, Matt Beaumont-Gay <matthewbg at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> + // Cut off the implicit 'this'.
>> + if (isa<CXXMethodDecl>(FnDecl))
>> + ArgsArray = ArgsArray.slice(1);
>>
>> What about static methods?
>
>
> nonnull.cc:4:15: error: overloaded 'operator<' cannot be a static member
> function
> static bool operator<(const X&, const char*) __attribute__((nonnull(2)));
> ^
>
> I can declare a static non-member, but that makes it a free function, which
> works fine:
>
> static bool operator>(const X&, const char*) __attribute__((nonnull(2)));
> [...]
> nonnull.cc:15:12: warning: null passed to a callee which requires a non-null
> argument [-Wnonnull]
> (void)(x > 0);
> ^ ~
>
> In this case the logic is copied from Sema::CheckFunctionCall in
> SemaChecking.cpp:
>
> bool IsMemberOperatorCall = isa<CXXOperatorCallExpr>(TheCall) &&
> isa<CXXMethodDecl>(FDecl);
> [...]
> if (IsMemberOperatorCall) {
> // If this is a call to a member operator, hide the first argument
> // from checkCall.
> // FIXME: Our choice of AST representation here is less than ideal.
> ++Args;
> --NumArgs;
> }
>
> but I don't need to test for CXXOperatorCallExpr since we know we just
> created one.
>
> Nick
>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote:
>> > GCC supports attribute nonnull on overloaded operators, but clang
>> > doesn't.
>> > This patch adds support to the code path around binary operators, as I
>> > don't
>> > think it's possible to make it fire on overloaded unary operators.
>> >
>> > Please review!
>> >
>> > Nick
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cfe-commits mailing list
>> > cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>> >
>
>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list