[cfe-commits] r173038 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
Manuel Klimek
klimek at google.com
Mon Jan 21 05:58:54 PST 2013
Author: klimek
Date: Mon Jan 21 07:58:54 2013
New Revision: 173038
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=173038&view=rev
Log:
Fixes detection of class template specializations.
Now correctly formats:
template <> class A<int> {} a;
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
cfe/trunk/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp?rev=173038&r1=173037&r2=173038&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp Mon Jan 21 07:58:54 2013
@@ -620,7 +620,17 @@
FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::coloncolon))
nextToken();
- if (FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::colon)) {
+ // Note that parsing away template declarations here leads to incorrectly
+ // accepting function declarations as record declarations.
+ // In general, we cannot solve this problem. Consider:
+ // class A<int> B() {}
+ // which can be a function definition or a class definition when B() is a
+ // macro. If we find enough real-world cases where this is a problem, we
+ // can parse for the 'template' keyword in the beginning of the statement,
+ // and thus rule out the record production in case there is no template
+ // (this would still leave us with an ambiguity between template function
+ // and class declarations).
+ if (FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::colon) || FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::less)) {
while (FormatTok.Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace)) {
if (FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::semi))
return;
@@ -630,6 +640,9 @@
}
if (FormatTok.Tok.is(tok::l_brace))
parseBlock();
+ // We fall through to parsing a structural element afterwards, so
+ // class A {} n, m;
+ // will end up in one unwrapped line.
}
void UnwrappedLineParser::parseObjCProtocolList() {
Modified: cfe/trunk/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp?rev=173038&r1=173037&r2=173038&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp Mon Jan 21 07:58:54 2013
@@ -1530,6 +1530,14 @@
// Redefinition from nested context:
verifyFormat("class A::B::C {} n;");
+ // Template definitions.
+ // FIXME: This is still incorrectly handled at the formatter side.
+ verifyFormat("template <> struct X < 15, i < 3 && 42 < 50 && 33<28> {};");
+
+ // FIXME:
+ // This now gets parsed incorrectly as class definition.
+ // verifyFormat("class A<int> f() {}\nint n;");
+
// Elaborate types where incorrectly parsing the structural element would
// break the indent.
verifyFormat("if (true)\n"
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list