[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Disallow __has_include and __has_include_next outside of preprocessor directives

[Dmitri Gribenko]

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote:
> 3 -- if there's not a current lexer, we have no way to know we're
> currently in a preprocessor directive (that I'm aware of).

Is there a case where we use this mode to parse a pp directive?  Can
we always emit an error in this case?

Dmitri

-- 
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/