[cfe-commits] [patch] Make ARM NEON polynomial types unsigned
Tim Northover
t.p.northover at gmail.com
Mon Jan 14 11:00:15 PST 2013
Hi Bob,
> What is the motivation for switching to unsigned?
I personally believe it's a more sane for a polynomial, by quite a
margin. For example it means that casting a poly8_t to a poly16_t will
use the natural embedding rather than converting (say) x^7 into x^15 +
x^14 + ... + x^7.
> Is there something different about AArch64 that makes you
> want to diverge from the de facto standard for those types?
I wouldn't call 2/3 a de facto standard, just a mess.
> If not, it really sounds to me like it might be best to just
> switch everything (including your AArch64 ABI) to use
> signed poly types.
That's not really a viable option at this stage. We're fixing bugs
(not that we expect any, fingers crossed), but not changing the ABI
for things like this.
Cheers.
Tim.
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list