[cfe-commits] r164083 - in /cfe/trunk: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp test/Sema/warn-duplicate-enum.c test/SemaCXX/warn-unique-enum.cpp

Richard Trieu rtrieu at google.com
Fri Dec 21 18:04:18 PST 2012


Thanks Ted.  I can see how these two warnings would get confused.  I did
work on both around the same time, both deal with enums and are adjacent to
each other in code.  I do hope that users find this warning useful.


On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com> wrote:

> Hi Richard,
>
> I was looking through my unread messages, and spotted this one.  I'm so
> sorry for missing this.
>
> I'm trying to page this back in now, and it all centered around the
> following thread on cfe-dev:
>
>   http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2012-September/024191.html
>
> That thread clearly discusses -Wunique-enum.  I've long paged this out, so
> I tried to look back and the thread and the original complaints I had
> received against -Wunique-enum from users and I don't see anything about
> -Wduplicate-enum.  I honestly may have intended to rip it out, or maybe I
> just got confused because the names were so close.  Since I don't know, I
> think it's reasonable to put the warning back in.  If we get user feedback
> that specifically complains about -Wduplicate-enum (instead of
> -Wunique-enum), we can act based on concrete information.
>
> Ted
>
> On Nov 1, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Richard Trieu <rtrieu at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Richard Trieu <rtrieu at google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Author: kremenek
>>> Date: Mon Sep 17 19:41:42 2012
>>> New Revision: 164083
>>>
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=164083&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Per discussion on cfe-dev, remove -Wunique-enums entirely.  There
>>> is no compelling argument that this is a generally useful warning,
>>> and imposes a strong stylistic argument on code beyond what it was
>>> intended to find warnings in.
>>>
>>> Removed:
>>>     cfe/trunk/test/Sema/warn-duplicate-enum.c
>>>     cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-unique-enum.cpp
>>> Modified:
>>>     cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
>>>     cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
>>>
>>> Hey Ted,
>>
>> Why was -Wduplicate-enum also removed in this commit?
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td?rev=164083&r1=164082&r2=164083&view=diff
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td Mon Sep 17
>>> 19:41:42 2012
>>> @@ -20,17 +20,6 @@
>>>    "used in loop condition not modified in loop body">,
>>>    InGroup<DiagGroup<"loop-analysis">>, DefaultIgnore;
>>>
>>> -def warn_identical_enum_values : Warning<
>>> -  "all elements of %0 are initialized with literals to value %1">,
>>> -  InGroup<DiagGroup<"unique-enum">>;
>>> -def note_identical_enum_values : Note<
>>> -  "initialize the last element with the previous element to silence "
>>> -  "this warning">;
>>> -def warn_duplicate_enum_values : Warning<
>>> -  "element %0 has been implicitly assigned %1 which another element has
>>> "
>>> -  "been assigned">, InGroup<DiagGroup<"duplicate-enum">>, DefaultIgnore;
>>> -def note_duplicate_element : Note<"element %0 also has value %1">;
>>> -
>>>  // Constant expressions
>>>  def err_expr_not_ice : Error<
>>>    "expression is not an %select{integer|integral}0 constant
>>> expression">;
>>>
>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp?rev=164083&r1=164082&r2=164083&view=diff
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp Mon Sep 17 19:41:42 2012
>>> @@ -10521,233 +10521,6 @@
>>>    return New;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -// Emits a warning if every element in the enum is the same value and if
>>> -// every element is initialized with a integer or boolean literal.
>>> -static void CheckForUniqueEnumValues(Sema &S, Decl **Elements,
>>> -                                     unsigned NumElements, EnumDecl
>>> *Enum,
>>> -                                     QualType EnumType) {
>>> -  if (S.Diags.getDiagnosticLevel(diag::warn_identical_enum_values,
>>> -                                 Enum->getLocation()) ==
>>> -      DiagnosticsEngine::Ignored)
>>> -    return;
>>> -
>>> -  if (NumElements < 2)
>>> -    return;
>>> -
>>> -  if (!Enum->getIdentifier())
>>> -    return;
>>> -
>>> -  llvm::APSInt FirstVal;
>>> -
>>> -  for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumElements; ++i) {
>>> -    EnumConstantDecl *ECD = cast_or_null<EnumConstantDecl>(Elements[i]);
>>> -    if (!ECD)
>>> -      return;
>>> -
>>> -    Expr *InitExpr = ECD->getInitExpr();
>>> -    if (!InitExpr)
>>> -      return;
>>> -    InitExpr = InitExpr->IgnoreImpCasts();
>>> -    if (!isa<IntegerLiteral>(InitExpr) &&
>>> !isa<CXXBoolLiteralExpr>(InitExpr))
>>> -      return;
>>> -
>>> -    if (i == 0) {
>>> -      FirstVal = ECD->getInitVal();
>>> -      continue;
>>> -    }
>>> -
>>> -    if (!llvm::APSInt::isSameValue(FirstVal, ECD->getInitVal()))
>>> -      return;
>>> -  }
>>> -
>>> -  S.Diag(Enum->getLocation(), diag::warn_identical_enum_values)
>>> -      << EnumType << FirstVal.toString(10)
>>> -      << Enum->getSourceRange();
>>> -
>>> -  EnumConstantDecl *Last = cast<EnumConstantDecl>(Elements[NumElements
>>> - 1]),
>>> -                   *Next = cast<EnumConstantDecl>(Elements[NumElements
>>> - 2]);
>>> -
>>> -  S.Diag(Last->getLocation(), diag::note_identical_enum_values)
>>> -    <<
>>> FixItHint::CreateReplacement(Last->getInitExpr()->getSourceRange(),
>>> -                                    Next->getName());
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -// Returns true when the enum initial expression does not trigger the
>>> -// duplicate enum warning.  A few common cases are exempted as follows:
>>> -// Element2 = Element1
>>> -// Element2 = Element1 + 1
>>> -// Element2 = Element1 - 1
>>> -// Where Element2 and Element1 are from the same enum.
>>> -static bool ValidDuplicateEnum(EnumConstantDecl *ECD, EnumDecl *Enum) {
>>> -  Expr *InitExpr = ECD->getInitExpr();
>>> -  if (!InitExpr)
>>> -    return true;
>>> -  InitExpr = InitExpr->IgnoreImpCasts();
>>> -
>>> -  if (BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(InitExpr)) {
>>> -    if (!BO->isAdditiveOp())
>>> -      return true;
>>> -    IntegerLiteral *IL = dyn_cast<IntegerLiteral>(BO->getRHS());
>>> -    if (!IL)
>>> -      return true;
>>> -    if (IL->getValue() != 1)
>>> -      return true;
>>> -
>>> -    InitExpr = BO->getLHS();
>>> -  }
>>> -
>>> -  // This checks if the elements are from the same enum.
>>> -  DeclRefExpr *DRE = dyn_cast<DeclRefExpr>(InitExpr);
>>> -  if (!DRE)
>>> -    return true;
>>> -
>>> -  EnumConstantDecl *EnumConstant =
>>> dyn_cast<EnumConstantDecl>(DRE->getDecl());
>>> -  if (!EnumConstant)
>>> -    return true;
>>> -
>>> -  if
>>> (cast<EnumDecl>(TagDecl::castFromDeclContext(ECD->getDeclContext())) !=
>>> -      Enum)
>>> -    return true;
>>> -
>>> -  return false;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -struct DupKey {
>>> -  int64_t val;
>>> -  bool isTombstoneOrEmptyKey;
>>> -  DupKey(int64_t val, bool isTombstoneOrEmptyKey)
>>> -    : val(val), isTombstoneOrEmptyKey(isTombstoneOrEmptyKey) {}
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -static DupKey GetDupKey(const llvm::APSInt& Val) {
>>> -  return DupKey(Val.isSigned() ? Val.getSExtValue() :
>>> Val.getZExtValue(),
>>> -                false);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -struct DenseMapInfoDupKey {
>>> -  static DupKey getEmptyKey() { return DupKey(0, true); }
>>> -  static DupKey getTombstoneKey() { return DupKey(1, true); }
>>> -  static unsigned getHashValue(const DupKey Key) {
>>> -    return (unsigned)(Key.val * 37);
>>> -  }
>>> -  static bool isEqual(const DupKey& LHS, const DupKey& RHS) {
>>> -    return LHS.isTombstoneOrEmptyKey == RHS.isTombstoneOrEmptyKey &&
>>> -           LHS.val == RHS.val;
>>> -  }
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -// Emits a warning when an element is implicitly set a value that
>>> -// a previous element has already been set to.
>>> -static void CheckForDuplicateEnumValues(Sema &S, Decl **Elements,
>>> -                                        unsigned NumElements, EnumDecl
>>> *Enum,
>>> -                                        QualType EnumType) {
>>> -  if (S.Diags.getDiagnosticLevel(diag::warn_duplicate_enum_values,
>>> -                                 Enum->getLocation()) ==
>>> -      DiagnosticsEngine::Ignored)
>>> -    return;
>>> -  // Avoid anonymous enums
>>> -  if (!Enum->getIdentifier())
>>> -    return;
>>> -
>>> -  // Only check for small enums.
>>> -  if (Enum->getNumPositiveBits() > 63 || Enum->getNumNegativeBits() >
>>> 64)
>>> -    return;
>>> -
>>> -  typedef llvm::SmallVector<EnumConstantDecl*, 3> ECDVector;
>>> -  typedef llvm::SmallVector<ECDVector*, 3> DuplicatesVector;
>>> -
>>> -  typedef llvm::PointerUnion<EnumConstantDecl*, ECDVector*>
>>> DeclOrVector;
>>> -  typedef llvm::DenseMap<DupKey, DeclOrVector, DenseMapInfoDupKey>
>>> -          ValueToVectorMap;
>>> -
>>> -  DuplicatesVector DupVector;
>>> -  ValueToVectorMap EnumMap;
>>> -
>>> -  // Populate the EnumMap with all values represented by enum constants
>>> without
>>> -  // an initialier.
>>> -  for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumElements; ++i) {
>>> -    EnumConstantDecl *ECD = cast<EnumConstantDecl>(Elements[i]);
>>> -
>>> -    // Null EnumConstantDecl means a previous diagnostic has been
>>> emitted for
>>> -    // this constant.  Skip this enum since it may be ill-formed.
>>> -    if (!ECD) {
>>> -      return;
>>> -    }
>>> -
>>> -    if (ECD->getInitExpr())
>>> -      continue;
>>> -
>>> -    DupKey Key = GetDupKey(ECD->getInitVal());
>>> -    DeclOrVector &Entry = EnumMap[Key];
>>> -
>>> -    // First time encountering this value.
>>> -    if (Entry.isNull())
>>> -      Entry = ECD;
>>> -  }
>>> -
>>> -  // Create vectors for any values that has duplicates.
>>> -  for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumElements; ++i) {
>>> -    EnumConstantDecl *ECD = cast<EnumConstantDecl>(Elements[i]);
>>> -    if (!ValidDuplicateEnum(ECD, Enum))
>>> -      continue;
>>> -
>>> -    DupKey Key = GetDupKey(ECD->getInitVal());
>>> -
>>> -    DeclOrVector& Entry = EnumMap[Key];
>>> -    if (Entry.isNull())
>>> -      continue;
>>> -
>>> -    if (EnumConstantDecl *D = Entry.dyn_cast<EnumConstantDecl*>()) {
>>> -      // Ensure constants are different.
>>> -      if (D == ECD)
>>> -        continue;
>>> -
>>> -      // Create new vector and push values onto it.
>>> -      ECDVector *Vec = new ECDVector();
>>> -      Vec->push_back(D);
>>> -      Vec->push_back(ECD);
>>> -
>>> -      // Update entry to point to the duplicates vector.
>>> -      Entry = Vec;
>>> -
>>> -      // Store the vector somewhere we can consult later for quick
>>> emission of
>>> -      // diagnostics.
>>> -      DupVector.push_back(Vec);
>>> -      continue;
>>> -    }
>>> -
>>> -    ECDVector *Vec = Entry.get<ECDVector*>();
>>> -    // Make sure constants are not added more than once.
>>> -    if (*Vec->begin() == ECD)
>>> -      continue;
>>> -
>>> -    Vec->push_back(ECD);
>>> -  }
>>> -
>>> -  // Emit diagnostics.
>>> -  for (DuplicatesVector::iterator DupVectorIter = DupVector.begin(),
>>> -                                  DupVectorEnd = DupVector.end();
>>> -       DupVectorIter != DupVectorEnd; ++DupVectorIter) {
>>> -    ECDVector *Vec = *DupVectorIter;
>>> -    assert(Vec->size() > 1 && "ECDVector should have at least 2
>>> elements.");
>>> -
>>> -    // Emit warning for one enum constant.
>>> -    ECDVector::iterator I = Vec->begin();
>>> -    S.Diag((*I)->getLocation(), diag::warn_duplicate_enum_values)
>>> -      << (*I)->getName() << (*I)->getInitVal().toString(10)
>>> -      << (*I)->getSourceRange();
>>> -    ++I;
>>> -
>>> -    // Emit one note for each of the remaining enum constants with
>>> -    // the same value.
>>> -    for (ECDVector::iterator E = Vec->end(); I != E; ++I)
>>> -      S.Diag((*I)->getLocation(), diag::note_duplicate_element)
>>> -        << (*I)->getName() << (*I)->getInitVal().toString(10)
>>> -        << (*I)->getSourceRange();
>>> -    delete Vec;
>>> -  }
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>  void Sema::ActOnEnumBody(SourceLocation EnumLoc, SourceLocation
>>> LBraceLoc,
>>>                           SourceLocation RBraceLoc, Decl *EnumDeclX,
>>>                           Decl **Elements, unsigned NumElements,
>>> @@ -10970,9 +10743,6 @@
>>>    // it needs to go into the function scope.
>>>    if (InFunctionDeclarator)
>>>      DeclsInPrototypeScope.push_back(Enum);
>>> -
>>> -  CheckForUniqueEnumValues(*this, Elements, NumElements, Enum,
>>> EnumType);
>>> -  CheckForDuplicateEnumValues(*this, Elements, NumElements, Enum,
>>> EnumType);
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  Decl *Sema::ActOnFileScopeAsmDecl(Expr *expr,
>>>
>>> Removed: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/warn-duplicate-enum.c
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/warn-duplicate-enum.c?rev=164082&view=auto
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/warn-duplicate-enum.c (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/warn-duplicate-enum.c (removed)
>>> @@ -1,92 +0,0 @@
>>> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -verify -Wduplicate-enum
>>> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -x c++ -fsyntax-only -verify -Wduplicate-enum
>>> -enum A {
>>> -  A1 = 0,  // expected-note {{element A1 also has value 0}}
>>> -  A2 = -1,
>>> -  A3,  // expected-warning {{element A3 has been implicitly assigned 0
>>> which another element has been assigned}}
>>> -  A4};
>>> -
>>> -enum B {
>>> -  B1 = -1,  // expected-note {{element B1 also has value -1}}
>>> -  B2,       // expected-warning {{element B2 has been implicitly
>>> assigned 0 which another element has been assigned}}
>>> -  B3,
>>> -  B4 = -2,
>>> -  B5,  // expected-warning {{element B5 has been implicitly assigned -1
>>> which another element has been assigned}}
>>> -  B6   // expected-note {{element B6 also has value 0}}
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -enum C { C1, C2 = -1, C3 }; // expected-warning{{element C1 has been
>>> implicitly assigned 0 which another element has been assigned}} \
>>> -  // expected-note {{element C3 also has value 0}}
>>> -
>>> -enum D {
>>> -  D1,
>>> -  D2,
>>> -  D3,  // expected-warning{{element D3 has been implicitly assigned 2
>>> which another element has been assigned}}
>>> -  D4 = D2,  // no warning
>>> -  D5 = 2  // expected-note {{element D5 also has value 2}}
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -enum E {
>>> -  E1,
>>> -  E2 = E1,
>>> -  E3 = E2
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -enum F {
>>> -  F1,
>>> -  F2,
>>> -  FCount,
>>> -  FMax = FCount - 1
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -enum G {
>>> -  G1,
>>> -  G2,
>>> -  GMax = G2,
>>> -  GCount = GMax + 1
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -enum {
>>> -  H1 = 0,
>>> -  H2 = -1,
>>> -  H3,
>>> -  H4};
>>> -
>>> -enum {
>>> -  I1 = -1,
>>> -  I2,
>>> -  I3,
>>> -  I4 = -2,
>>> -  I5,
>>> -  I6
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -enum { J1, J2 = -1, J3 };
>>> -
>>> -enum {
>>> -  K1,
>>> -  K2,
>>> -  K3,
>>> -  K4 = K2,
>>> -  K5 = 2
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -enum {
>>> -  L1,
>>> -  L2 = L1,
>>> -  L3 = L2
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -enum {
>>> -  M1,
>>> -  M2,
>>> -  MCount,
>>> -  MMax = MCount - 1
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -enum {
>>> -  N1,
>>> -  N2,
>>> -  NMax = N2,
>>> -  NCount = NMax + 1
>>> -};
>>>
>>> Removed: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-unique-enum.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-unique-enum.cpp?rev=164082&view=auto
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-unique-enum.cpp (original)
>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-unique-enum.cpp (removed)
>>> @@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
>>> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -verify -Wunique-enum
>>> -enum A { A1 = 1, A2 = 1, A3 = 1 };  // expected-warning {{all elements
>>> of 'A' are initialized with literals to value 1}} \
>>> -// expected-note {{initialize the last element with the previous
>>> element to silence this warning}}
>>> -enum { B1 = 1, B2 = 1, B3 = 1 }; // no warning
>>> -enum C { // expected-warning {{all elements of 'C' are initialized with
>>> literals to value 1}}
>>> -  C1 = true,
>>> -  C2 = true  // expected-note {{initialize the last element with the
>>> previous element to silence this warning}}
>>> -};
>>> -enum D { D1 = 5, D2 = 5L, D3 = 5UL, D4 = 5LL, D5 = 5ULL };  //
>>> expected-warning {{all elements of 'D' are initialized with literals to
>>> value 5}} \
>>> -// expected-note {{initialize the last element with the previous
>>> element to silence this warning}}
>>> -
>>> -// Don't warn on enums with less than 2 elements.
>>> -enum E { E1 = 4 };
>>> -enum F { F1 };
>>> -enum G {};
>>> -
>>> -// Don't warn when integer literals do not initialize the elements.
>>> -enum H { H1 = 4, H_MAX = H1, H_MIN = H1 };
>>> -enum I { I1 = H1, I2 = 4 };
>>> -enum J { J1 = 4, J2 = I2 };
>>> -enum K { K1, K2, K3, K4 };
>>> -
>>> -// Don't crash or warn on this one.
>>> -// rdar://11875995
>>> -enum L {
>>> -  L1 = 0x8000000000000000ULL, L2 = 0x0000000000000001ULL
>>> -};
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>
>>
>> Why was -Wduplicate-enum removed?  It is a separate warning from
> -Wunique-enum.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20121221/8f1404bc/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list