[cfe-commits] r170573 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Sema/SemaObjCProperty.cpp test/SemaObjC/property-category-impl.m

[Jordan Rose]

I just meant @implementation Foo @end, but okay, thanks.


On Dec 19, 2012, at 11:23 , jahanian <fjahanian at apple.com> wrote:

> 
> On Dec 19, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> How about this case?
> 
> This case works too (if you are referring to this completed test case):
> 
> @protocol Foo
> @property (copy) id foo;
> @end
> 
> @interface FooParent
> - (id)foo;
> - (void)setFoo:(id)foo;
> @end
> 
> @interface Foo : FooParent <Foo>
> @end
> 
> @interface Foo(CAT) <Foo>
> @end
> 
> @implementation Foo(CAT)
> @end
> 
> Category's conforming protocol's property is implemented via setter/getter in its primary class's super class's
> implementation. So, no warning.
> 
> - Fariborz
> 
>> 
>>> @protocol Foo
>>> @property id foo
>>> @end
>>> 
>>> @interface FooParent
>>> - (id)foo;
>>> - (void)setFoo:(id)foo;
>>> @end
>>> 
>>> @interface Foo : FooParent <Foo>
>>> @end
>> 
>> (The opposite case should be handled by a property implicitly defining its accessors.)
>> Jordan
>> 
>