[cfe-commits] r169778 - /cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c

Bill Wendling isanbard at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 11:22:16 PST 2012


Hell if I know. I didn't want to bother with it anymore.

-bw

On Dec 17, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:

> This never got added back. What was the problem, just a missing -target?
> 
> On 10 December 2012 17:10, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Author: void
>> Date: Mon Dec 10 16:10:53 2012
>> New Revision: 169778
>> 
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=169778&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Remove until I can fix this.
>> 
>> Removed:
>>    cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c
>> 
>> Removed: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c?rev=169777&view=auto
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c (original)
>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c (removed)
>> @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
>> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -O0 -emit-llvm -disable-red-zone -femit-coverage-notes -femit-coverage-data %s -o - | FileCheck %s
>> -
>> -// <rdar://problem/12843084>
>> -
>> -int test1(int a) {
>> -  switch (a % 2) {
>> -  case 0:
>> -    ++a;
>> -  case 1:
>> -    a /= 2;
>> -  }
>> -  return a;
>> -}
>> -
>> -// Check tha the `-mno-red-zone' flag is set here on the generated functions.
>> -
>> -// CHECK: void @__llvm_gcov_indirect_counter_increment(i32* %{{.*}}, i64** %{{.*}}) unnamed_addr noinline noredzone
>> -// CHECK: void @__llvm_gcov_writeout() unnamed_addr noinline noredzone
>> -// CHECK: void @__llvm_gcov_init() unnamed_addr noinline noredzone
>> -// CHECK: void @__gcov_flush() unnamed_addr noinline noredzone
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list