[cfe-commits] r169510 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp test/SemaCXX/lambda-expressions.cpp
David Blaikie
dblaikie at gmail.com
Thu Dec 6 08:22:25 PST 2012
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Benjamin Kramer
<benny.kra at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Author: d0k
> Date: Thu Dec 6 09:42:21 2012
> New Revision: 169510
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=169510&view=rev
> Log:
> Sema: Don't emit a warning when __func__ is used in a lambda outside of a function.
>
> Fixes PR14518.
>
> Modified:
> cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
> cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/lambda-expressions.cpp
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp?rev=169510&r1=169509&r2=169510&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp Thu Dec 6 09:42:21 2012
> @@ -2571,8 +2571,14 @@
> // string.
>
> Decl *currentDecl = getCurFunctionOrMethodDecl();
> - if (!currentDecl && getCurBlock())
> - currentDecl = getCurBlock()->TheDecl;
> + // Blocks and lambdas can occur at global scope. Don't emit a warning.
> + if (!currentDecl) {
> + if (const BlockScopeInfo *BSI = getCurBlock())
> + currentDecl = BSI->TheDecl;
> + else if (const LambdaScopeInfo *LSI = getCurLambda())
> + currentDecl = LSI->CallOperator;
> + }
> +
> if (!currentDecl) {
> Diag(Loc, diag::ext_predef_outside_function);
> currentDecl = Context.getTranslationUnitDecl();
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/lambda-expressions.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/lambda-expressions.cpp?rev=169510&r1=169509&r2=169510&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/lambda-expressions.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/lambda-expressions.cpp Thu Dec 6 09:42:21 2012
> @@ -236,3 +236,7 @@
> namespace PR13854 {
> auto l = [](void){};
> }
> +
> +namespace PR14518 {
> + auto f = [](void) { return __func__; }; // no-warning
Just out of curiosity: what does this actually expand to in this
context? Should we test the expansion is what we expect it to be? (is
there a separate/interesting codepath for it that's not being verified
by other tests?)
> +}
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list