[cfe-commits] [Review] First step towards PR13231 - vftable generation with -cxx-abi microsoft
Timur Iskhodzhanov
timurrrr at google.com
Wed Nov 28 21:09:44 PST 2012
Thanks for the review!
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:52 AM, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote:
> + // FIXME: Should probably add a layer of abstraction for vtable
> + // generation, see http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13231#c5
> + bool MsABI = (Context.getTargetInfo().getCXXABI() == CXXABI_Microsoft);
>
> Please don't litter the code with PR references.
Quick question - what's better?
(1)
// FIXME: Should probably add a layer of abstraction for vtable
// generation, see PR13231#c5
(2)
// FIXME: Should probably add a layer of abstraction for vtable generation.
(that's 75 chars - close to the line limit)
(3)
// FIXME: <your text here>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list