[cfe-commits] OpenMP-Patch-1: fopenmp option support
Hal Finkel
hfinkel at anl.gov
Tue Oct 30 09:42:58 PDT 2012
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron Lieberman" <ronl at codeaurora.org>
> To: "Mahesha HS" <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com>, "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> Cc: "llvm cfe" <cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 11:40:08 AM
> Subject: RE: [cfe-commits] OpenMP-Patch-1: fopenmp option support
>
> Seems fine to me.
This also looks good to me.
Thanks again,
Hal
>
> Ron
> ---
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by
> The Linux Foundation
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mahesha HS [mailto:mahesha.llvm at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:32 PM
> To: Hal Finkel; ronl at codeaurora.org
> Cc: llvm cfe
> Subject: Re: [cfe-commits] OpenMP-Patch-1: fopenmp option support
>
> Hi Hal and Ron,
>
> Here is possibilities, for -fopenmp and -fno-openmp combinations. Is
> it
> looks okay?
>
> 1. Neither -fopenmp nor -fno-openmp is passed.
> if (Translation unit has OpenMP source)
> Do emit warning.
> else
> Do nothing.
>
> 2. Only -fopenmp is passed
> if (Translation unit has OpenMP source)
> Do process it.
> else
> Do nothing.
>
> 3. Only -fno-openmp is passed
> if (Translation unit has OpenMP source)
> Do nothing
> else
> Do nothing
>
> Note: It is actually no-op.
>
> 4. -fopenmp -fno-openmp is passed in the same order
> Same as 3.
>
> 5. -fno-openmp -fopenmp is passed in the same order
> Same as 2
>
>
> --
> mahesha
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Ron and Hal,
> >
> > I think, my investigation on -fno-openmp was not thorough enough.
> > Based on your mails, I do think that Clang should have support for
> > this option too. I will support this option.
> >
> >
> > --
> > mahesha
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> > wrote:
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Mahesha HS" <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com>
> >>> To: "Eli Friedman" <eli.friedman at gmail.com>, "Dmitri Gribenko"
> >>> <gribozavr at gmail.com>
> >>> Cc: "llvm cfe" <cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
> >>> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 12:47:50 AM
> >>> Subject: [cfe-commits] OpenMP-Patch-1: fopenmp option support
> >>>
> >>> Hi Eli and Dmitri,
> >>>
> >>> Let me start again from the beginning one step at a time. Going
> >>> further, I avoid sending more than one patch at a time as
> >>> reviewing
> >>> (big) several patches requires considerable effort, and also some
> >>> time it is confusing. Attached is the very first patch to support
> >>> -fopenmp option. This patch is in fact smaller one, and it
> >>> already
> >>> went through few rounds of review, and all the review comments
> >>> are
> >>> taken for it.
> >>>
> >>> However, please take one more look at it, and if it is in a good
> >>> shape to commit, please do the same or provide me an approval to
> >>> commit this patch. OTOH, if there is any fresh review comments, I
> >>> will work on it.
> >>>
> >>> Note: Chandler as an opinion to support counter part of this
> >>> option,
> >>> namely -fno-openmp. I am still thinking, if it is worth
> >>> supporting
> >>> it as I am not aware of any other OpenMP compiler supporting such
> >>> an
> >>> option. However, let us think about it, and if we decide that it
> >>> is
> >>> useful to support it, I will support it.
> >>
> >> One thing that we could do, which gcc does not do (as of 4.7.2),
> >> is
> explicitly disable all unused pragma warnings when -fno-openmp is
> provided.
> Otherwise, the usefulness of -fno-openmp is certainly context
> dependent. As
> Mahesha points out, so long as OpenMP is disabled by default (as it
> is in
> gcc and many other compilers), using -fno-openmp by itself is a
> no-op. The
> inverted options are sometimes useful for overriding default options
> in a
> makefile (at least when the user options appear after the default
> options in
> the makefile). In gcc, -fopenmp -fno-openmp leaves OpenMP disabled,
> while
> -fno-openmp -fopenmp enables OpenMP.
> >>
> >> Mahesha, Thanks again for working on this.
> >>
> >> -Hal
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> mahesha
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cfe-commits mailing list
> >>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Hal Finkel
> >> Postdoctoral Appointee
> >> Leadership Computing Facility
> >> Argonne National Laboratory
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > mahesha
>
>
>
> --
> mahesha
>
>
--
Hal Finkel
Postdoctoral Appointee
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list