[cfe-commits] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] ARM ABI: handle varargs with vector types.
manman ren
mren at apple.com
Tue Oct 16 11:10:40 PDT 2012
On Oct 15, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 15, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 15, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:46 PM, manman ren <mren at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The initial patch was updated and separated to two patches (attached).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first patch will fix passing legal vector types as varargs:
>>>>>> We make sure the vector is correctly aligned before casting it to the vector type.
>>>>>
>>>>> + uint64_t Size = CGF.getContext().getTypeSize(Ty) / 8;
>>>>> + uint64_t TyAlign = CGF.getContext().getTypeAlign(Ty) / 8;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + // The ABI alignment for vectors is 8 for AAPCS and 4 for APCS.
>>>>> + if (Ty->getAs<VectorType>() && Size >= 8) {
>>>>> + if (getABIKind() == ARMABIInfo::AAPCS_VFP ||
>>>>> + getABIKind() == ARMABIInfo::AAPCS)
>>>>> + TyAlign = 8;
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + TyAlign = 4;
>>>>> + }
>>>>>
>>>>> We should be using the same rules here we do for argument passing. In
>>>>> particular, for APCS, the argument-passing type alignment is
>>>>> unconditionally 4. (This can have effects for structs marked with
>>>>> "__attribute__((aligned(16)))", etc.)
>>>> Is there an interface to query the argument-passing alignment?
>>>
>>> Nothing cares about it other than the calling convention code, so
>>> there isn't a general API. It's basically just "match whatever
>>> ARMABIInfo::classifyArgumentType does".
>>
>> I don't see code in ARMABIInfo::classifyArgumentType that checks the argument-passing alignment.
>> The code in the patch is trying to match what the calling convention does in the backend:
>
> Yes, it's a bit tricky because of the implicit contract between clang
> and the ARM backend... you basically have to combine the frontend and
> backend rules to figure out how the result is actually represented on
> the stack. When you do that, it comes out to always 4 for APCS, and I
> think it comes out to min(max(naturalAlign, 4), 8) for AAPCS.
I think you are right, the patch is updated, please review again :]
Manman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: arm-abi-vector-1st.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4778 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20121016/e5dcb153/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
>
> -Eli
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list