[cfe-commits] r160174 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/AST/Decl.cpp test/CodeGenCXX/visibility-inlines-hidden.cpp
Tobias Grosser
tobias at grosser.es
Thu Oct 11 09:03:59 PDT 2012
Raphael,
would you mind taking a look?
On 09/29/2012 11:42 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 09/23/2012 07:51 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 07/13/2012 04:25 PM, Rafael Espindola wrote:
>>> Author: rafael
>>> Date: Fri Jul 13 09:25:36 2012
>>> New Revision: 160174
>>>
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=160174&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Use -fvisibility-inlines-hidden in inline functions too. This matches
>>> gcc
>>> behavior since gcc pr30066. Thanks to Benjamin Kramer for pointing it
>>> out.
>>
>> This commit causes clang to fail, when compiling Polly.
>>
>> The error I get is:
>>
>> /usr/bin/ld: error:
>> tools/polly/lib/Analysis/CMakeFiles/PollyAnalysis.dir/ScopInfo.cpp.o:
>> requires dynamic R_X86_64_PC32 reloc against '__gmpz_neg' which may
>> overflow at runtime; recompile with -fPIC
>>
>> I get the same error on other projects that use
>> -fvisibility-inlines-hidden in combination with gmp. The error
>> disappears with older versions of gcc and clang. There is also no error
>> if I use gcc 4.7, even though gcc 4.7 should have the functionality that
>> was introduced in this commit (pr30066 is part of gcc4.7).
>>
>> I looked into this and reduced a test case:
>>
>> extern __inline__ __attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__))
>> void foo() {}
>>
>> void bar() {
>> foo();
>> }
>>
>> I compiled with both current clang++ and g++-4.7.
>>
>> g++-4.7 -S test-visiblity-inlines-hidden-gnuinline.cpp
>> -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O0 -o g++.s
>>
>> clang++ -S test-visiblity-inlines-hidden-gnuinline.cpp
>> -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O0 -o clang.s
>>
>> Both, clang.s and g++.s, contain no implementation of foo, but a call to
>> foo. However, clang.s contains the string ".hidden _Z3foov", g++.s does
>> not contain the string. This difference seems to cause incorrect
>> relocation information.
>>
>> The attached patch fixes this for me. I also tried to add a test case,
>> but was not sure what LLVM-IR output I should put into the CHECK-line.
>> Can anybody comment on the solution?
>
> Rafael, could you have a look?
>
> Tobi
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
.file "test-visiblity-inlines-hidden-gnuinline.cpp"
.text
.globl _Z3barv
.type _Z3barv, @function
_Z3barv:
.LFB1:
.cfi_startproc
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset 6, -16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register 6
call _Z3foov
popq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE1:
.size _Z3barv, .-_Z3barv
.ident "GCC: (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.0-7ubuntu3) 4.7.0"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"", at progbits
-------------- next part --------------
.file "test-visiblity-inlines-hidden-gnuinline.cpp"
.text
.globl _Z3barv
.align 16, 0x90
.type _Z3barv, at function
_Z3barv: # @_Z3barv
.cfi_startproc
# BB#0: # %entry
pushq %rbp
.Ltmp2:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.Ltmp3:
.cfi_offset %rbp, -16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.Ltmp4:
.cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
callq _Z3foov
popq %rbp
ret
.Ltmp5:
.size _Z3barv, .Ltmp5-_Z3barv
.cfi_endproc
.hidden _Z3foov
.section ".note.GNU-stack","", at progbits
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test-visiblity-inlines-hidden-gnuinline.cpp
Type: text/x-c++src
Size: 89 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20121011/15fc6f3b/attachment.cpp>
-------------- next part --------------
>From a5890a4e2aa5b35c7aff792ffd1004f3f9afeeef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:39:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix InlineVisibilityHidden with GNUInlineAttr
---
clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp
index 13f931a..2eca7cc 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp
@@ -193,7 +193,8 @@ static bool useInlineVisibilityHidden(const NamedDecl *D) {
// anyway.
return TSK != TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration &&
TSK != TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition &&
- FD->hasBody(Def) && Def->isInlined();
+ FD->getASTContext().getLangOpts().InlineVisibilityHidden &&
+ FD->hasBody(Def) && Def->isInlined() && !Def->hasAttr<GNUInlineAttr>();
}
static LinkageInfo getLVForNamespaceScopeDecl(const NamedDecl *D,
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list