[cfe-commits] r164677 -

Nico Weber thakis at chromium.org
Thu Sep 27 19:26:06 PDT 2012


On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
>> >> I couldn't think of a great way. If no filename argument is present,
>> >> -cc1 -verify reads its input from stdin, which is a valid usecase. I
>> >> think lit closes stdin when it forks, which is why -cc1 doesn't just
>> >> wait for eof forever in this case.
>> >
>> > It is a valid use case, but how about just requiring that it be
>> > explicit (at least for -verify)? Forcing it to be explicit would
>> > preserve the use case but make the error case impossible.
>>
>> Sounds resonable. Wanna give it a shot? :-)
>
>
> Alternatively (and slightly more generally) how about teaching -verify to
> fail if it doesn't find any expected-* comments to check (like FileCheck
> does)?

That wouldn't have helped in this case though, would it? there's no
expected- comment in this file.

>
>>
>> >
>> > -- Sean Silva
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:22 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>  /cfe/trunk/test/Sema/no-format-y2k-turnsoff-format.c
>> >> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> >>
>> >> If clang was going to read from stdin, wouldn't it need a -x to tell it
>> >> what kind of input it is? Even if it has a default, an empty file is
>> >> not a valid TU, at least in C++, though I guess if it has a default it
>> >> would be C and an empty file is probably valid C. Perhaps a warning
>> >> there at least could be handy
>> >> From: Nico Weber
>> >> Sent: 9/27/2012 7:43 AM
>> >> To: Sean Silva
>> >> Cc: Nico Weber; cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> >> Subject: Re: [cfe-commits] r164677
>> >> - /cfe/trunk/test/Sema/no-format-y2k-turnsoff-format.c
>> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
>> >>> Is there some way to ensure that this doesn't ever happen again? Like
>> >>> having -verify warn/fail if there is no input? That would allow fixing
>> >>> all of these cases in a single fell swoop and ensure that it never
>> >>> happens again.
>> >>
>> >> I couldn't think of a great way. If no filename argument is present,
>> >> -cc1 -verify reads its input from stdin, which is a valid usecase. I
>> >> think lit closes stdin when it forks, which is why -cc1 doesn't just
>> >> wait for eof forever in this case.
>> >>
>> >> I suppose lit could check if clang_cc1 is the first command on the run
>> >> line and then add a flag that tells cc1 to error out if it's reading
>> >> from stdin, but seems brittle.
>> >>
>> >> Do you have a good suggestion?
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> -- Sean Silva
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Nico Weber <nicolasweber at gmx.de>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> Author: nico
>> >>>> Date: Wed Sep 26 04:02:07 2012
>> >>>> New Revision: 164677
>> >>>>
>> >>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=164677&view=rev
>> >>>> Log:
>> >>>> Make this test actually test something
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Modified:
>> >>>>     cfe/trunk/test/Sema/no-format-y2k-turnsoff-format.c
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/no-format-y2k-turnsoff-format.c
>> >>>> URL:
>> >>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/no-format-y2k-turnsoff-format.c?rev=164677&r1=164676&r2=164677&view=diff
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ==============================================================================
>> >>>> --- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/no-format-y2k-turnsoff-format.c (original)
>> >>>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/no-format-y2k-turnsoff-format.c Wed Sep 26
>> >>>> 04:02:07 2012
>> >>>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> >>>> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fsyntax-only -Wformat -Wno-format-y2k
>> >>>> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fsyntax-only -Wformat -Wno-format-y2k %s
>> >>>>  // rdar://9504680
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  void foo(const char *, ...) __attribute__((__format__ (__printf__,
>> >>>> 1, 2)));
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> >>>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> >>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> >>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cfe-commits mailing list
>> >> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list