[cfe-commits] r163605 - /cfe/trunk/tools/driver/driver.cpp
Richard Smith
richard at metafoo.co.uk
Tue Sep 11 03:10:22 PDT 2012
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:58 AM, David Chisnall <csdavec at swan.ac.uk> wrote:
> Author: theraven
> Date: Tue Sep 11 04:58:54 2012
> New Revision: 163605
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=163605&view=rev
> Log:
> Select the correct, or, failing that, compatible, dialect when invoked as
> cc,
> c89, c99, and so on. No change to the default dialect when invoked as
> clang /
> clang++.
>
>
> Modified:
> cfe/trunk/tools/driver/driver.cpp
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/tools/driver/driver.cpp
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/tools/driver/driver.cpp?rev=163605&r1=163604&r2=163605&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/tools/driver/driver.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/tools/driver/driver.cpp Tue Sep 11 04:58:54 2012
> @@ -277,21 +277,32 @@
> // "x86_64-linux-clang" as interpreted as suffix "clang" with
> // target prefix "x86_64-linux". If such a target prefix is found,
> // is gets added via -target as implicit first argument.
> + //
> + // The default language dialect depends on the name by which clang was
> + // invoked. These names first follow the standard and then the GCC
> + // implementation. When invoked as c89 or c99, clang should be a c89
> or c99
> + // compiler, respectively, per POSIX. The compiler called cc was
> deprecated
> + // by POSIX in 1997 and the language dialect is implementation defined.
> + // Unfortunately, a lot of existing code depends on it being a C89
> compiler.
> static const struct {
> const char *Suffix;
> bool IsCXX;
> bool IsCPP;
> + const char *DefaultDialect;
> } suffixes [] = {
> - { "clang", false, false },
> - { "clang++", true, false },
> - { "clang-c++", true, false },
> - { "clang-cc", false, false },
> - { "clang-cpp", false, true },
> - { "clang-g++", true, false },
> - { "clang-gcc", false, false },
> - { "cc", false, false },
> - { "cpp", false, true },
> - { "++", true, false },
> + { "clang", false, false, 0 },
> + { "clang++", true, false, 0 },
> + { "clang-c++", true, false, 0 },
> + { "clang-cc", false, false, "-std=c89" },
> + { "clang-cpp", false, true, 0 },
> + { "clang-g++", true, false, "-std=gnu++89" },
> + { "clang-gcc", false, false, "-std=gnu89" },
> + { "cc", false, false, "-std=c89" },
> + { "c89", false, false, "-std=c89" },
> + { "c99", false, false, "-std=c99" },
> + { "c11", false, false, "-std=c11" },
> + { "cpp", false, true, 0 },
> + { "++", true, false, 0 },
> };
> std::string ProgName(llvm::sys::path::stem(ArgVector[0]));
> StringRef ProgNameRef(ProgName);
> @@ -304,10 +315,14 @@
> for (i = 0; i < sizeof(suffixes) / sizeof(suffixes[0]); ++i) {
> if (ProgNameRef.endswith(suffixes[i].Suffix)) {
> FoundMatch = true;
> - if (suffixes[i].IsCXX)
> + if (suffixes[i].IsCXX) {
> TheDriver.CCCIsCXX = true;
> + fprintf(stderr, "ccc is c++\n");
>
I assume you didn't mean to submit this line?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120911/a22d6fbd/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list