[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Ignored calling conventions

João Matos ripzonetriton at gmail.com
Thu Sep 6 20:14:34 PDT 2012


On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>wrote:
>
> Since it's a documented behavior for MSVC, we should consider
> supporting it the same way.  This isn't bug-for-bug compatibility so
> much as honoring what MSVC has decided a language extension's behavior
> should be.
>

Alright, makes sense. Calling it a bug is not correct in this case, just a
pretty weird behavior.

Correct, but as Richard has pointed out, rewriters already fail with
> attributes anyway because they cannot get the original spelling.  This
> does add to that burden, but minimally.


 Well, then maybe add a FIXME or a test so that it triggers once this is
finished and this can be fixed.

About the new patch, I just want to check how cl behaves
when targeting ARM. If it has the same behavior, maybe we should check
we're not on x86 32-bit instead?

-- 
João Matos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120907/9246abfc/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list