[cfe-commits] [clang-tools-extra] r163009 - in /clang-tools-extra/trunk/test: loop-convert/ remove-cstr-calls/

Chandler Carruth chandlerc at google.com
Fri Aug 31 12:34:27 PDT 2012


On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Daniel (& anyone else),
> >> >
> >> > Do you know if the documentation here (
> >> > http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#rtcustom /
> >> >
> >> >
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/TestingGuide.html?view=diff&r1=36059&r2=36060
> >> > ) is still valid? It doesn't appear to be, since my change below
> >> > doesn't do particularly interesting quoting/escaping gymnastics &
> >> > seems to work fine.
> >> >
> >> > Any ideas? Should we update the documentation? Does anyone know
> >> > what/when/how/why this changed?
> >>
> >> What is actually going on here is that the LLVM test suite and the
> >> Clang test suite use a different style of test.
> >>
> >>
> >> The LLVM test suite is technically written using Tcl syntax, and the
> >> Clang test suite uses shell syntax. The document in question is
> >> referring to the LLVM test suite.
> >
> >
> > Is this still true? I tried to switch the LLVM test suite to use the
> ShTest
> > syntax. I thought I had succeeded.
>
> Nope, I just never noticed that. Many thanks for whatever awesome
> bastard perl creation you used to accomplish that feat. :)


And thanks for the reminder to go nuke the tcl stuff... I'll do that this
evening.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120831/f4606256/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list