[cfe-commits] [PATCH] fix PR13704

[Michael Liao]

On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:07 -0700, Matt Beaumont-Gay wrote:
> This looks pretty reasonable, but the testcase probably doesn't need
> to have a printf call in it.

Test case is revised to call an external function instead of printf.
please let me know whether it's OK to commit.

Yours
- Michael

> 
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Michael Liao <michael.liao at intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The attached patch fixes PR13704 which is caused by the missing sign
> > when increments (1 or -1) are created for types larger than 64-bit
> > integer.
> >
> > Yours
> > - Michael
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-commits mailing list
> > cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
> >

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-fix-PR13704.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1549 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120827/d596c214/attachment.bin>