[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Rename matchers to better match AST nodes

[Sean Silva]

If it's not completely consistent, then you lose the ability to say,
in one sentence "the correspondence is X", which still means you have
to go back to the docs to look up the correspondence ("is this one of
the ones that isn't named consistently?").

I think that it is a case of "premature optimization" to not go all
the way. Why not "go all the way" and then scale back later if it gets
to be a pain to write or another issue is found?

Thanks,

--Sean Silva

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Manuel Klimek
<reviews at llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com> wrote:
>
>   I'm wondering whether we'll really get the benefit if we don't go all the way.
>
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D21
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits