[cfe-commits] [PATCH] AST matchers

[Douglas Gregor]

On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:29 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> CamelCase is fine for these. I notice that there's some inconsistency with
>>> 'has' names, e.g., hasDescendant vs. HasType.
>> 
>> 
>> Update: Chandler voted for using llvm coding style (and I agree). The
>> argument is that the callable classes we have are just classes to work
>> around missing variadic templates and that they will become functions anyway
>> once we get C++11 into llvm (in a future, far, far away).
> 
> Actually - this is a layer on top of Clang the compiler, so why
> wouldn't it just use C++11? It doesn't have the same constraints of
> buildability with host compilers as the compiler does - you can always
> just compile this with Clang.


Our support for generating code on Windows is still too poor to make this something we depend on.

Unless someone has a Tool that maps variadic templates down to C++03 ;)

	- Doug