[cfe-commits] [PATCH] AST matchers

[Douglas Gregor]

On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:
> CamelCase is fine for these. I notice that there's some inconsistency with 'has' names, e.g., hasDescendant vs. HasType.
> 
> Update: Chandler voted for using llvm coding style (and I agree). The argument is that the callable classes we have are just classes to work around missing variadic templates and that they will become functions anyway once we get C++11 into llvm (in a future, far, far away).

Works for me.

	- Doug


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120629/727b6110/attachment.html>