[cfe-commits] [PATCH] Improved __declspec support
Richard Smith
richard at metafoo.co.uk
Sun Jun 17 16:47:48 PDT 2012
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> Mostly just nitpicking:
>>
>>> Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td (revision 158272)
>>> +++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td (working copy)
>>> @@ -481,6 +481,9 @@
>>> "introducing an attribute">;
>>> def err_alignas_pack_exp_unsupported : Error<
>>> "pack expansions in alignment specifiers are not supported yet">;
>>> +def err_unknown_ms_declspec : Error<"unrecognized __declspec attribute %0">;
>>
>> This should probably be a Warning, and InGroup<UnknownAttributes>. It
>> would also seems sensible to mirror the wording of
>> warn_unknown_attribute_ignored: "unknown __declspec attribute %0
>> ignored".
>
> The reason I made it an error was because it's an error in VS as well.
> Since it pertains to __declspec, which is already MS-specific, I
> figured the behavior should match. Given that reasoning, do you still
> think we should prefer a warning over an error?
Yes. Code using new Visual Studio 2013 (or whatever) __declspec
attributes shouldn't have to wait for a new Clang release in order to
ignore the attributes (for this reason I also don't think we *need* a
different diagnostic for "we've heard of this attribute but don't
support it" versus "we've not heard of this attribute" -- but I don't
object to that distinction either).
--
Richard
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list