[cfe-commits] r158488 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/CodeGen/CGException.cpp test/CodeGenCXX/exceptions.cpp
John McCall
rjmccall at apple.com
Thu Jun 14 22:27:05 PDT 2012
Author: rjmccall
Date: Fri Jun 15 00:27:05 2012
New Revision: 158488
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=158488&view=rev
Log:
It turns out that implementing the rethrow-on-fallthrough
semantics of a ctor/dtor function-try-block catch handler
by pushing a normal cleanup is not just overkill but actually
actively wrong when the handler contains an explicit return
(which is only legal in a dtor). Just emit the rethrow as
ordinary code at the fallthrough point. Fixes PR13102.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGException.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/exceptions.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGException.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGException.cpp?rev=158488&r1=158487&r2=158488&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGException.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGException.cpp Fri Jun 15 00:27:05 2012
@@ -1127,14 +1127,6 @@
CGF.EmitAutoVarCleanups(var);
}
-namespace {
- struct CallRethrow : EHScopeStack::Cleanup {
- void Emit(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Flags flags) {
- CGF.EmitCallOrInvoke(getReThrowFn(CGF));
- }
- };
-}
-
/// Emit the structure of the dispatch block for the given catch scope.
/// It is an invariant that the dispatch block already exists.
static void emitCatchDispatchBlock(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
@@ -1246,11 +1238,12 @@
if (HaveInsertPoint())
Builder.CreateBr(ContBB);
- // Determine if we need an implicit rethrow for all these catch handlers.
- bool ImplicitRethrow = false;
+ // Determine if we need an implicit rethrow for all these catch handlers;
+ // see the comment below.
+ bool doImplicitRethrow = false;
if (IsFnTryBlock)
- ImplicitRethrow = isa<CXXDestructorDecl>(CurCodeDecl) ||
- isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(CurCodeDecl);
+ doImplicitRethrow = isa<CXXDestructorDecl>(CurCodeDecl) ||
+ isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(CurCodeDecl);
// Perversely, we emit the handlers backwards precisely because we
// want them to appear in source order. In all of these cases, the
@@ -1273,15 +1266,24 @@
// Initialize the catch variable and set up the cleanups.
BeginCatch(*this, C);
- // If there's an implicit rethrow, push a normal "cleanup" to call
- // _cxa_rethrow. This needs to happen before __cxa_end_catch is
- // called, and so it is pushed after BeginCatch.
- if (ImplicitRethrow)
- EHStack.pushCleanup<CallRethrow>(NormalCleanup);
-
// Perform the body of the catch.
EmitStmt(C->getHandlerBlock());
+ // [except.handle]p11:
+ // The currently handled exception is rethrown if control
+ // reaches the end of a handler of the function-try-block of a
+ // constructor or destructor.
+
+ // It is important that we only do this on fallthrough and not on
+ // return. Note that it's illegal to put a return in a
+ // constructor function-try-block's catch handler (p14), so this
+ // really only applies to destructors.
+ if (doImplicitRethrow && HaveInsertPoint()) {
+ EmitCallOrInvoke(getReThrowFn(*this));
+ Builder.CreateUnreachable();
+ Builder.ClearInsertionPoint();
+ }
+
// Fall out through the catch cleanups.
CatchScope.ForceCleanup();
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/exceptions.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/exceptions.cpp?rev=158488&r1=158487&r2=158488&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/exceptions.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/exceptions.cpp Fri Jun 15 00:27:05 2012
@@ -414,3 +414,39 @@
// CHECK: [[TEST9_NEW:%.*]] = call noalias i8* @_Znam
// CHECK: call void @_ZdaPv(i8* [[TEST9_NEW]])
}
+
+// In a destructor with a function-try-block, a return statement in a
+// catch handler behaves differently from running off the end of the
+// catch handler. PR13102.
+namespace test10 {
+ extern void cleanup();
+ extern bool suppress;
+
+ struct A { ~A(); };
+ A::~A() try { cleanup(); } catch (...) { return; }
+ // CHECK: define void @_ZN6test101AD1Ev(
+ // CHECK: invoke void @_ZN6test107cleanupEv()
+ // CHECK-NOT: rethrow
+ // CHECK: ret void
+
+ struct B { ~B(); };
+ B::~B() try { cleanup(); } catch (...) {}
+ // CHECK: define void @_ZN6test101BD1Ev(
+ // CHECK: invoke void @_ZN6test107cleanupEv()
+ // CHECK: call i8* @__cxa_begin_catch
+ // CHECK-NEXT: invoke void @__cxa_rethrow()
+ // CHECK: unreachable
+
+ struct C { ~C(); };
+ C::~C() try { cleanup(); } catch (...) { if (suppress) return; }
+ // CHECK: define void @_ZN6test101CD1Ev(
+ // CHECK: invoke void @_ZN6test107cleanupEv()
+ // CHECK: call i8* @__cxa_begin_catch
+ // CHECK-NEXT: load i8* @_ZN6test108suppressE, align 1
+ // CHECK-NEXT: trunc
+ // CHECK-NEXT: br i1
+ // CHECK: call void @__cxa_end_catch()
+ // CHECK-NEXT: br label
+ // CHECK: invoke void @__cxa_rethrow()
+ // CHECK: unreachable
+}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list