[cfe-commits] r157910 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp
Douglas Gregor
dgregor at apple.com
Sun Jun 3 17:15:09 PDT 2012
Author: dgregor
Date: Sun Jun 3 19:15:09 2012
New Revision: 157910
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=157910&view=rev
Log:
When adding built-in operator candidates for overload resolution
involving 'restrict', place restrict on the pointer type rather than
on the pointee type. Also make sure that we gather restrict from the
pointer type. Fixes PR12854 and the major part of PR11093.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp?rev=157910&r1=157909&r2=157910&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp Sun Jun 3 19:15:09 2012
@@ -6120,40 +6120,49 @@
const PointerType *PointerTy = Ty->getAs<PointerType>();
bool buildObjCPtr = false;
if (!PointerTy) {
- if (const ObjCObjectPointerType *PTy = Ty->getAs<ObjCObjectPointerType>()) {
- PointeeTy = PTy->getPointeeType();
- buildObjCPtr = true;
- }
- else
- llvm_unreachable("type was not a pointer type!");
- }
- else
+ const ObjCObjectPointerType *PTy = Ty->castAs<ObjCObjectPointerType>();
+ PointeeTy = PTy->getPointeeType();
+ buildObjCPtr = true;
+ } else {
PointeeTy = PointerTy->getPointeeType();
-
+ }
+
// Don't add qualified variants of arrays. For one, they're not allowed
// (the qualifier would sink to the element type), and for another, the
// only overload situation where it matters is subscript or pointer +- int,
// and those shouldn't have qualifier variants anyway.
if (PointeeTy->isArrayType())
return true;
+
unsigned BaseCVR = PointeeTy.getCVRQualifiers();
- if (const ConstantArrayType *Array =Context.getAsConstantArrayType(PointeeTy))
- BaseCVR = Array->getElementType().getCVRQualifiers();
bool hasVolatile = VisibleQuals.hasVolatile();
bool hasRestrict = VisibleQuals.hasRestrict();
// Iterate through all strict supersets of BaseCVR.
for (unsigned CVR = BaseCVR+1; CVR <= Qualifiers::CVRMask; ++CVR) {
if ((CVR | BaseCVR) != CVR) continue;
- // Skip over Volatile/Restrict if no Volatile/Restrict found anywhere
- // in the types.
+ // Skip over volatile if no volatile found anywhere in the types.
if ((CVR & Qualifiers::Volatile) && !hasVolatile) continue;
- if ((CVR & Qualifiers::Restrict) && !hasRestrict) continue;
+
+ // Skip over restrict if no restrict found anywhere in the types, or if
+ // the type cannot be restrict-qualified.
+ if ((CVR & Qualifiers::Restrict) &&
+ (!hasRestrict ||
+ (!(PointeeTy->isAnyPointerType() || PointeeTy->isReferenceType()))))
+ continue;
+
+ // Build qualified pointee type.
QualType QPointeeTy = Context.getCVRQualifiedType(PointeeTy, CVR);
+
+ // Build qualified pointer type.
+ QualType QPointerTy;
if (!buildObjCPtr)
- PointerTypes.insert(Context.getPointerType(QPointeeTy));
+ QPointerTy = Context.getPointerType(QPointeeTy);
else
- PointerTypes.insert(Context.getObjCObjectPointerType(QPointeeTy));
+ QPointerTy = Context.getObjCObjectPointerType(QPointeeTy);
+
+ // Insert qualified pointer type.
+ PointerTypes.insert(QPointerTy);
}
return true;
@@ -6350,6 +6359,8 @@
// as see them.
bool done = false;
while (!done) {
+ if (CanTy.isRestrictQualified())
+ VRQuals.addRestrict();
if (const PointerType *ResTypePtr = CanTy->getAs<PointerType>())
CanTy = ResTypePtr->getPointeeType();
else if (const MemberPointerType *ResTypeMPtr =
@@ -6359,8 +6370,6 @@
done = true;
if (CanTy.isVolatileQualified())
VRQuals.addVolatile();
- if (CanTy.isRestrictQualified())
- VRQuals.addRestrict();
if (VRQuals.hasRestrict() && VRQuals.hasVolatile())
return VRQuals;
}
@@ -6488,7 +6497,8 @@
/// \brief Helper method to factor out the common pattern of adding overloads
/// for '++' and '--' builtin operators.
void addPlusPlusMinusMinusStyleOverloads(QualType CandidateTy,
- bool HasVolatile) {
+ bool HasVolatile,
+ bool HasRestrict) {
QualType ParamTypes[2] = {
S.Context.getLValueReferenceType(CandidateTy),
S.Context.IntTy
@@ -6511,6 +6521,33 @@
else
S.AddBuiltinCandidate(CandidateTy, ParamTypes, Args, 2, CandidateSet);
}
+
+ // Add restrict version only if there are conversions to a restrict type
+ // and our candidate type is a non-restrict-qualified pointer.
+ if (HasRestrict && CandidateTy->isAnyPointerType() &&
+ !CandidateTy.isRestrictQualified()) {
+ ParamTypes[0]
+ = S.Context.getLValueReferenceType(
+ S.Context.getCVRQualifiedType(CandidateTy, Qualifiers::Restrict));
+ if (NumArgs == 1)
+ S.AddBuiltinCandidate(ParamTypes[0], ParamTypes, Args, 1, CandidateSet);
+ else
+ S.AddBuiltinCandidate(CandidateTy, ParamTypes, Args, 2, CandidateSet);
+
+ if (HasVolatile) {
+ ParamTypes[0]
+ = S.Context.getLValueReferenceType(
+ S.Context.getCVRQualifiedType(CandidateTy,
+ (Qualifiers::Volatile |
+ Qualifiers::Restrict)));
+ if (NumArgs == 1)
+ S.AddBuiltinCandidate(ParamTypes[0], ParamTypes, Args, 1,
+ CandidateSet);
+ else
+ S.AddBuiltinCandidate(CandidateTy, ParamTypes, Args, 2, CandidateSet);
+ }
+ }
+
}
public:
@@ -6565,7 +6602,8 @@
Arith < NumArithmeticTypes; ++Arith) {
addPlusPlusMinusMinusStyleOverloads(
getArithmeticType(Arith),
- VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasVolatile());
+ VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasVolatile(),
+ VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasRestrict());
}
}
@@ -6589,8 +6627,10 @@
continue;
addPlusPlusMinusMinusStyleOverloads(*Ptr,
- (!S.Context.getCanonicalType(*Ptr).isVolatileQualified() &&
- VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasVolatile()));
+ (!(*Ptr).isVolatileQualified() &&
+ VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasVolatile()),
+ (!(*Ptr).isRestrictQualified() &&
+ VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasRestrict()));
}
}
@@ -7048,14 +7088,36 @@
S.AddBuiltinCandidate(ParamTypes[0], ParamTypes, Args, 2, CandidateSet,
/*IsAssigmentOperator=*/ isEqualOp);
- if (!S.Context.getCanonicalType(*Ptr).isVolatileQualified() &&
- VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasVolatile()) {
+ bool NeedVolatile = !(*Ptr).isVolatileQualified() &&
+ VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasVolatile();
+ if (NeedVolatile) {
// volatile version
ParamTypes[0] =
S.Context.getLValueReferenceType(S.Context.getVolatileType(*Ptr));
S.AddBuiltinCandidate(ParamTypes[0], ParamTypes, Args, 2, CandidateSet,
/*IsAssigmentOperator=*/isEqualOp);
}
+
+ if (!(*Ptr).isRestrictQualified() &&
+ VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasRestrict()) {
+ // restrict version
+ ParamTypes[0]
+ = S.Context.getLValueReferenceType(S.Context.getRestrictType(*Ptr));
+ S.AddBuiltinCandidate(ParamTypes[0], ParamTypes, Args, 2, CandidateSet,
+ /*IsAssigmentOperator=*/isEqualOp);
+
+ if (NeedVolatile) {
+ // volatile restrict version
+ ParamTypes[0]
+ = S.Context.getLValueReferenceType(
+ S.Context.getCVRQualifiedType(*Ptr,
+ (Qualifiers::Volatile |
+ Qualifiers::Restrict)));
+ S.AddBuiltinCandidate(ParamTypes[0], ParamTypes, Args, 2,
+ CandidateSet,
+ /*IsAssigmentOperator=*/isEqualOp);
+ }
+ }
}
if (isEqualOp) {
@@ -7076,14 +7138,36 @@
S.AddBuiltinCandidate(ParamTypes[0], ParamTypes, Args, 2, CandidateSet,
/*IsAssigmentOperator=*/true);
- if (!S.Context.getCanonicalType(*Ptr).isVolatileQualified() &&
- VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasVolatile()) {
+ bool NeedVolatile = !(*Ptr).isVolatileQualified() &&
+ VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasVolatile();
+ if (NeedVolatile) {
// volatile version
ParamTypes[0] =
S.Context.getLValueReferenceType(S.Context.getVolatileType(*Ptr));
S.AddBuiltinCandidate(ParamTypes[0], ParamTypes, Args, 2,
CandidateSet, /*IsAssigmentOperator=*/true);
}
+
+ if (!(*Ptr).isRestrictQualified() &&
+ VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasRestrict()) {
+ // restrict version
+ ParamTypes[0]
+ = S.Context.getLValueReferenceType(S.Context.getRestrictType(*Ptr));
+ S.AddBuiltinCandidate(ParamTypes[0], ParamTypes, Args, 2,
+ CandidateSet, /*IsAssigmentOperator=*/true);
+
+ if (NeedVolatile) {
+ // volatile restrict version
+ ParamTypes[0]
+ = S.Context.getLValueReferenceType(
+ S.Context.getCVRQualifiedType(*Ptr,
+ (Qualifiers::Volatile |
+ Qualifiers::Restrict)));
+ S.AddBuiltinCandidate(ParamTypes[0], ParamTypes, Args, 2,
+ CandidateSet, /*IsAssigmentOperator=*/true);
+
+ }
+ }
}
}
}
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp?rev=157910&r1=157909&r2=157910&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp Sun Jun 3 19:15:09 2012
@@ -237,3 +237,22 @@
(void)(x - x);
}
}
+
+namespace PR12854 {
+ enum { size = 1 };
+ void plus_equals() {
+ int* __restrict py;
+ py += size;
+ }
+
+ struct RestrictInt {
+ operator int* __restrict &();
+ };
+
+ void user_conversions(RestrictInt ri) {
+ ++ri;
+ --ri;
+ ri++;
+ ri--;
+ }
+}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list